The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Effects of User Experience and System Transparency on Trust in Automation
Open accessAbstract
Existing research assessing human operators' trust in automation and robots has primarily examined trust as a steady-state variable, with little emphasis on the evolution of trust over time. With the goal of addressing this research gap, we present a study exploring the dynamic nature of trust. We defined trust of entirety as a measure that accounts for trust across a human's entire interactive experience with automation, and first identified alternatives to quantify it using real-time measurements of trust. Second, we provided a novel model that attempts to explain how trust of entirety evolves as a user interacts repeatedly with automation. Lastly, we investigated the effects of automation transparency on momentary changes of trust. Our results indicated that trust of entirety is better quantified by the average measure of "area under the trust curve" than the traditional post-experiment trust measure. In addition, we found that trust of entirety evolves and eventually stabilizes as an operator repeatedly interacts with a technology. Finally, we observed that a higher level of automation transparency may mitigate the "cry wolf" effect -- wherein human operators begin to reject an automated system due to repeated false alarms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, some studies also employed linear trust meters [137], or visual analog scales [139].”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
In the citing paper
“Some authors work with correlations to get a better sense of perceived trustworthiness and system capabilities [5,12,24,39,66,67,81,94,130,139,142].Here the larger the correlation between perceived trustworthiness and system capabilities, the better the calibration.”
From Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
In the citing paper
“With few exceptions, we have little understanding of how trust strengthens or decays due to moment-to-moment interactions with automation”
From Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“trust is a dynamic variable that can change over time”
From Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Critically, the opaqueness of the AI's internal computational processes may decrease calibrated reliance on the system [63 , 64] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Such measures include, but are not limited to measuring end-users' decision time [19,62], how many times end-users requested AI recommendation [52], and how many times they agreed with AI recommendations [7,23,58].”
From Being Trustworthy is Not Enough: How Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) Can Deceive the End-Users and Gain Their Trust (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Most of the studies investigated how to maintain appropriate trust calibration by continuously presenting system information to prevent over-trust or under-trust.”
From Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Several studies [13, 23, 26] have demonstrated that reliance behavior can be explained by the relationship between a user’s trust in the agents and the user’s self-confidence.”
From Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315665177 · Cited by 5,017
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology
Ebbinghaus, H. (2013) · Annals of Neurosciences · doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408 · Cited by 2,827
Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720814547570 · Cited by 2,817
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051 · cited 2×
“Research has indicated that the calibration between operators’ trust and an automated/robotic technology’s actual ability is often imperfect [9, 10].”
BackgroundMemory: A contribution to experimental psychology.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913) · doi:10.1037/10011-000 · Cited by 1,645
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems
LEE, J., & MORAY, N. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967392 · Cited by 1,459
A decision-making theory of visual detection.
Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0058700 · Cited by 1,357
Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation
Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007 · Cited by 932
Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids
Muir, B. M. (1987) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5 · Cited by 808
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Chen , J. Y. C. 2010. Robotics operator performance in a multi-tasking environment: Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations . Ashgate Publishing , 294--314. Chen, J. Y. C. 2010. Robotics operator performance in a multi-tasking environment: Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Ashgate Publishing, 294--314.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams
de Visser, E. J., Peeters, M. M. M., Jung, M. F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T. H., Pak, R., & Neerincx, M. A. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x · Cited by 447
Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review and reference guide
Kohn, S. C., de Visser, E. J., Wiese, E., Lee, Y.-C., & Shaw, T. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977 · Cited by 315
Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Stiegemeier, D., & Baumann, M. (2020) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819853686 · Cited by 276
Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229132 · Cited by 239
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Vereschak, O., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476068 · Cited by 229
Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportunities
Kok, B. C., & Soh, H. (2020) · Current Robotics Reports · doi:10.1007/s43154-020-00029-y · Cited by 245
Effects of Anthropomorphism and Accountability on Trust in Human Robot Interaction
Natarajan, M., & Gombolay, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3319502.3374839 · Cited by 248
Planning with Trust for Human-Robot Collaboration
Chen, M., Nikolaidis, S., Soh, H., Hsu, D., & Srinivasa, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171264 · Cited by 221
Vorm, E. S., & Combs, D. J. Y. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2070107 · Cited by 232
Kunze, A., Summerskill, S. J., Marshall, R., & Filtness, A. J. (2019) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842 · Cited by 165
Situational Awareness, Driver’s Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance
Petersen, L., Robert, L., Yang, X. J., & Tilbury, D. M. (2019) · SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles · doi:10.4271/12-02-02-0009 · Cited by 178
Self-citationHartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2018) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012 · Cited by 164
Mehrotra, S., Degachi, C., Vereschak, O., Jonker, C. M., & Tielman, M. L. (2024) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3696449 · Cited by 219
Trust-Aware Decision Making for Human-Robot Collaboration
Chen, M., Nikolaidis, S., Soh, H., Hsu, D., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359616 · Cited by 147
Modeling and predicting trust dynamics in human–robot teaming: A Bayesian inference approach
Guo, Y., & Yang, X. J. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00703-3 · Cited by 133
Self-citationWischnewski, M., Krämer, N., & Müller, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581197 · Cited by 146
“In addition, some studies also employed linear trust meters [137], or visual analog scales [139].”
BackgroundInfluentialXAI Systems Evaluation: A Review of Human and Computer-Centred Methods
Lopes, P., Silva, E., Braga, C., Oliveira, T., & Rosado, L. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199423 · Cited by 112
System Transparency in Shared Autonomy: A Mini Review
Alonso, V., & de la Puente, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2018.00083 · Cited by 107
Yang, X. J., Schemanske, C., & Searle, C. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211034716 · Cited by 132
Self-citationModeling Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey
Khavas, Z. R., Ahmadzadeh, R., & Robinette, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_44 · Cited by 120
Real-Time Estimation of Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Systems
Azevedo-Sa, H., Jayaraman, S. K., Esterwood, C. T., Yang, X. J., Robert, L., & Tilbury, D. M. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00694-1 · Cited by 102
Self-citationSilva, A., Schrum, M., Hedlund-Botti, E., Gopalan, N., & Gombolay, M. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2101698 · Cited by 104
Lu, Y., & Sarter, N. B. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2019.2930980 · Cited by 102
Booth, S., Tompkin, J., Pfister, H., Waldo, J., Gajos, K. Z., & Nagpal, R. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020211 · Cited by 84
Driving Style: How Should an Automated Vehicle Behave?
de Oliveira, L. C. R., Proctor, K., Burns, C. G., & Birrell, S. A. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10060219 · Cited by 90
Multi-task trust transfer for human–robot interaction
Soh, H., Xie, Y., Chen, M., & Hsu, D. (2019) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919866905 · Cited by 88
Jiao, J. R., Zhou, F., Gebraeel, N., & Duffy, V. G. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1722324 · Cited by 78
Adams, S., Kuch, D., Diamond, L. M., Fröhlich, P., Henriksen, I. M., Katzeff, C., Ryghaug, M., & Yılmaz, S. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102210 · Cited by 70
Benk, M., Kerstan, S., von Wangenheim, F., & Ferrario, A. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02059-y · Cited by 101
Explainable recommendation: when design meets trust calibration
Naiseh, M., Al-Thani, D., Jiang, N., & Ali, R. (2021) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-021-00916-0 · Cited by 68
“One goal of explainable artificial intelligence is to mitigate trust calibration errors [92].”
BackgroundSecurity Considerations in AI-Robotics: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities
Neupane, S., Mitra, S., Fernandez, I. A., Saha, S., Mittal, S., Chen, J., Pillai, N., & Rahimi, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3363657 · Cited by 96
Takeover Transition in Autonomous Vehicles: A YouTube Study
Zhou, F., Yang, X. J., & Xin, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1634317 · Cited by 62
Self-citationVisual Interactive Privacy Policy: The Better Choice?
Reinhardt, D., Borchard, J., & Hurtienne, J. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445465 · Cited by 58
Empirical Evaluations of Framework for Adaptive Trust Calibration in Human-AI Cooperation
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3042556 · Cited by 66
Du, N., Huang, K. Y., & Yang, X. J. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819862916 · Cited by 55
Self-citationBanovic, N., Yang, Z., Ramesh, A., & Liu, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579460 · Cited by 55
Calibrating Trust in Automation Through Familiarity With the Autoparking Feature of a Tesla Model X
Tenhundfeld, N. L., de Visser, E. J., Haring, K. S., Ries, A. J., Finomore, V. S., & Tossell, C. C. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343419869083 · Cited by 55
Quantifying teaching behavior in robot learning from demonstration
Sena, A., & Howard, M. (2019) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919884623 · Cited by 46
A systematic review of functions and design features of in-vehicle agents
Lee, S. C., & Jeon, M. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102864 · Cited by 47
Hussein, A., Elsawah, S., & Abbass, H. A. (2020) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1764112 · Cited by 51
Toward Adaptive Driving Styles for Automated Driving with Users' Trust and Preferences
Natarajan, M., Akash, K., & Misu, T. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889313 · Cited by 42
Mixed Initiative Systems for Human-Swarm Interaction: Opportunities and Challenges
Hussein, A., & Abbass, H. A. (2018) · doi:10.1109/sysmc.2018.8509744 · Cited by 41
Trust Mediating Reliability–Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human–Swarm Interactions
Hussein, A., Elsawah, S., & Abbass, H. (2019) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720819879273 · Cited by 40
Xu, L., Guo, L., Ge, P., & Wang, X. (2022) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.001 · Cited by 37
Rachel, H. Y., Morris, A. P., Herriotts, P., & Birrell, S. A. (2020) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103272 · Cited by 35
Reverse Psychology in Trust-Aware Human-Robot Interaction
Guo, Y., Shi, C., & Yang, X. J. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3067626 · Cited by 35
Self-citationHuang, C., He, D., Wen, X. L., & Yan, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236062 · Cited by 38
Explainable robotic systems: understanding goal-driven actions in a reinforcement learning scenario
Cruz, F., Dazeley, R., Vamplew, P., & Moreira, I. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06425-5 · Cited by 34
A study on the use of cryptocurrency wallets from a user experience perspective
Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.313 · Cited by 35
The Perception of Automation Reliability and Acceptance of Automated Advice
Hutchinson, J., Strickland, L., Farrell, S., & Loft, S. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211062985 · Cited by 32
Ha, T., Sah, Y. J., Park, Y., & Lee, S. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1846789 · Cited by 33
A workload adaptive haptic shared control scheme for semi-autonomous driving
Luo, R., Weng, Y., Wang, Y., Jayakumar, P., Brudnak, M., Paul, V., Desaraju, V. R., Stein, J. L., Ersal, T., & Yang, X. J. (2021) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105968 · Cited by 30
Self-citationAffective Design Analysis of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A User-Centric Perspective
Bernardo, E. L., & Seva, R. R. (2023) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics10010032 · Cited by 35
Bhat, S., Lyons, J. B., Shi, C., & Yang, X. J. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634921 · Cited by 30
Self-citationA review of mathematical models of human trust in automation
Rodriguez, L. R., Bustamante-Orellana, C., Chiou, E. K., Huang, L., Cooke, N. J., & Kang, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1171403 · Cited by 32
Robot-Assisted Decision-Making: Unveiling the Role of Uncertainty Visualisation and Embodiment
Schömbs, S., Pareek, S., Gonçalves, J., & Johal, W. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642911 · Cited by 29
Coordinating Human-Robot Teams with Dynamic and Stochastic Task Proficiencies
Liu, R., Natarajan, M., & Gombolay, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3477391 · Cited by 31
Luo, R., Du, N., & Yang, X. J. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2097602 · Cited by 28
Self-citationEnhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28
Safe and Trustful AI for Closed-Loop Control Systems
Schöning, J., & Pfisterer, H.-J. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12163489 · Cited by 34
Poornikoo, M., Gyldensten, W., Vesin, B., & Øvergård, K. I. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2399439 · Cited by 30
TIP: A Trust Inference and Propagation Model in Multi-Human Multi-Robot Teams
Guo, Y., Yang, X. J., & Shi, C. (2023) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-024-10175-3 · Cited by 37
Self-citationHuman Trust in Robots: A Survey on Trust Models and Their Controls/Robotics Applications
Wang, Y., Li, F., Zheng, H., Jiang, L., Mahani, M. F., & Liao, Z. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of Control Systems · doi:10.1109/ojcsys.2023.3345090 · Cited by 29
Lester, C. A., Li, J., Ding, Y., Rowell, B. E., Yang, X. J., & Kontar, R. A. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00483-8 · Cited by 26
Self-citationYang, X. J., Guo, Y., & Schemanske, C. (2022) · Automation, collaboration, and e-services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10784-9_15 · Cited by 26
Self-citationTrusting Autonomous Teammates in Human-AI Teams - A Literature Review
Duan, W., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., Scalia, M. J., Zhang, R., Gorman, J. C., Freeman, G., Zhou, S., Hauptman, A. I., & Yin, X. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713527 · Cited by 36
Tenhundfeld, N. L., Demir, M., & de Visser, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434221096261 · Cited by 26
Power in Human-Robot Interaction
Hou, Y. T.-Y., Cheon, E., & Jung, M. F. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634949 · Cited by 27
Guo, Y., Yang, X., & Shi, C. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.003 · Cited by 23
Self-citationA Review on Trust in Human-Robot InteractionPreprint
Khavas, Z. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.10045 · Cited by 53
TDM: Trustworthy Decision-Making Via Interpretability Enhancement
Lyu, D., Yang, F., Kwon, H., Dong, W., Yılmaz, L., & Liu, B. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2021.3084290 · Cited by 24
Interaction Needs and Opportunities for Failing Robots
Morales, C. G., Carter, E. J., Tan, X. Z., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2019) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3322276.3322345 · Cited by 22
The role of interdependence in trust
Johnson, M., & Bradshaw, J. M. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00016-2 · Cited by 23
Adaptive Trust Calibration for Supervised Autonomous Vehicles
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2018) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3239092.3265948 · Cited by 23
Kim, J. Y., Lester, C., & Yang, X. J. (2025) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208251326795 · Cited by 21
Self-citationKopp, T. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01082-1 · Cited by 26
An Empirical Study of Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Robo-Advisors
Kwon, D., Jeong, P., & Chung, D. (2022) · Journal of Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1142/s0219649222500393 · Cited by 24
Trust Dynamics in Human-AV (Automated Vehicle) Interaction
Luo, R., Chu, J., & Yang, X. J. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382970 · Cited by 19
Self-citationA Computational Model of Coupled Human Trust and Self-confidence Dynamics
Williams, K. J., Yuh, M. S., & Jain, N. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3594715 · Cited by 18
Learning Models of Sequential Decision-Making with Partial Specification of Agent Behavior
Unhelkar, V. V., & Shah, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012522 · Cited by 17
Self-citationCalibrating Trust in Human-Drone Cooperative Navigation
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2020) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223509 · Cited by 17
Matsumoto, S., Ghosh, P., Jamshad, R., & Riek, L. D. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576994 · Cited by 16
The Transfer of Human Trust in Robot Capabilities across Tasks
Soh, H., Pan, S. L., Chen, M., & Hsu, D. (2018) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2018.xiv.033 · Cited by 17
Guo, Y., Yang, X. J., & Shi, C. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3580164 · Cited by 15
Self-citationHussein, A., Elsawah, S., & Abbass, H. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.047 · Cited by 15
Guo, L., Wang, X., Xu, L., & Guan, L. (2024) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2024.2340671 · Cited by 14
Khac, L. T. D., & Leyer, M. (2025) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103064 · Cited by 17
Towards Balancing Preference and Performance through Adaptive Personalized Explainability
Silva, A., Tambwekar, P., Schrum, M., & Gombolay, M. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3635000 · Cited by 14
Quesada, R. C., & Demiris, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3660649 · Cited by 14
Kim, J. Y., Marshall, V. D., Rowell, B. E., Chen, Q., Zheng, Y., Lee, J. D., Kontar, R. A., Lester, C. A., & Yang, X. J. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/60273 · Cited by 16
Self-citationAutonomous Justification for Enabling Explainable Decision Support in Human-Robot Teaming
Luebbers, M. B., Tabrez, A., Ruvane, K., & Hayes, B. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.002 · Cited by 15
Tutul, A. A., Nirjhar, E. H., & Chaspari, T. (2021) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3462244.3479926 · Cited by 15
Real-Time Workload Estimation Using Eye Tracking: A Bayesian Inference Approach
Luo, R., Weng, Y., Jayakumar, P., Brudnak, M., Paul, V., Desaraju, V. R., Stein, J. L., Ersal, T., & Yang, X. J. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2205274 · Cited by 12
Self-citationTingelhoff, F., Schultheiss, R., Schöbel, S., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-024-10494-x · Cited by 15
Hong, J., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.045 · Cited by 13
Grand challenges for human factors and ergonomics
Karwowski, W., Salvendy, G., Endsley, M. R., Rouse, W. B., Salmon, P. M., Stanney, K. M., Thatcher, A., Andre, T., Yang, X. J., Ayaz, H., et al. (2025) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2024.2431336 · Cited by 23
Self-citationExplainable robotic systems: understanding goal-driven actions in a reinforcement learning scenario
(14618705), F. C., Dazeley, R., (13351392), P. V., & (13430100), I. M. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 12
Diamond, L. M., Mirnig, A. G., & Fröhlich, P. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16052393 · Cited by 11
Modeling Trust Dynamics in Human-robot Teaming: A Bayesian Inference Approach
Guo, Y., Zhang, C.-J., & Yang, X. J. (2020) · CHI Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3334480.3383007 · Cited by 12
Self-citationOn Trust-aware Assistance-seeking in Human-Supervised Autonomy
Mangalindan, D. H., Rovira, E. M., & Srivastava, V. (2023) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc55779.2023.10156103 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, X. J., Unhelkar, V. V., Li, K., & Shah, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-03-06
- Pages
- 408-416
- OpenAlex
- W2594678573
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Singapore University of Technology and Design
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- trust in automation, automation transparency, user experience, trust dynamics, false alarms, human-automation interaction, trust measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
