The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action research
Open accessAbstract
article Free Access Share on Action research Authors: David E. Avison Univ. of Southampton, England Univ. of Southampton, EnglandView Profile , Francis Lau Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaView Profile , Michael D. Myers Univ. of Auckland, New Zealand Univ. of Auckland, New ZealandView Profile , Peter Axel Nielsen Aalborg Univ., Denmark Aalborg Univ., DenmarkView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 42Issue 1Jan. 1999 pp 94–97https://doi.org/10.1145/291469.291479Published:01 January 1999Publication History 618citation30,709DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations618Total Downloads30,709Last 12 Months10,591Last 6 weeks1,793 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteView all FormatsPDF
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research
Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/026839629601100305 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668
The ABC of Software Engineering Research
Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3241743 · Cited by 245
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.011 · Cited by 204
Adaptive governance for the Internet of Things: Coping with emerging security risks
Brass, I., & Sowell, J. H. (2021) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12343 · Cited by 71
Meta-design: Transforming and Enriching the Design and Use of Socio-technical Systems
Fischer, G., & Herrmann, T. (2015) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_6 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Avison, D. E., Lau, F., Myers, M. D., & Nielsen, P. A.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-97
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2339106955
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/291469.291479
- The paper
- Avison, D. E., Lau, F., Myers, M. D., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/291469.291479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
