Cited by 205Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsSoftware Engineering Research

Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies

Open access
Coleman, Gerry, O’Connor, Rory·2007·Information and Software Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.011

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sixteen articles provide a comprehensive presentation of their research method, of which five articles present extensive documentation about the GT research process.

    “Sixteen articles (Boxes 2.3.1, 2.3.2) provide a comprehensive presentation of their research method, of which five articles present extensive documentation about the GT research process [2, 18, 45, 47, 49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25][25] Hevner, A. and March, S., 2003, 'The Information Systems Research Cycle', in IEEE Computer, November, pp. 111-113. -
  2. [31][31] Myers, M.D., 1997, 'Qualitative Research in Information Systems', in Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, June, pp. 241-242. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R.
Affiliations
  • Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Connor, Rory
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
654-667
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104380696
Cited by
204
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
24.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
software process improvement, grounded theory, software development process, research methodology selection, software development practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review