Cited by 3,539Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations

Open access
Covington, Paul, Adams, Jay, Sargin, Emre·2016·Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Abstract

YouTube represents one of the largest scale and most sophisticated industrial recommendation systems in existence. In this paper, we describe the system at a high level and focus on the dramatic performance improvements brought by deep learning. The paper is split according to the classic two-stage information retrieval dichotomy: first, we detail a deep candidate generation model and then describe a separate deep ranking model. We also provide practical lessons and insights derived from designing, iterating and maintaining a massive recommendation system with enormous user-facing impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2959100.2959190

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-PPR can dynamically adjust product recommendations based on users' online behaviors, thereby improving recommendation accuracy and matching.

    “AI-PPR can dynamically adjust product recommendations based on users' online behaviors (e.g., likes, viewing duration, sharing), thereby improving recommendation accuracy and matching [30].”

    From Exploring the Mechanism of AI-Powered Personalized Product Recommendation on Generation Z Users’ Spontaneous Buying Intention on Short-Form Video Platforms: A Perceived Evaluation Perspective (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The System Overview and Feature Engineering sections describe personalized YouTube video recommendations that use users’ watch and search histories and respond to recent viewing behavior. The paper does not establish the claim for product recommendations or identify likes and sharing as inputs; its reported improvements concern video-ranking and watch-time metrics, not product-matching accuracy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • We do not consider non-deep learning approaches for generating item/content embeddings because other works have already proven state-of-the-art performance of deep learning approaches for generating such embeddings.

    “We also do not consider non-deep learning approaches for generating item/content embeddings, since other works have already proven state-of-the-art performance of deep learning approaches for generating such embeddings [9, 12, 24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. Sedhain, A. K. Menon, S. Sanner, and L. Xie. Autorec: Autoencoders meet collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '15 Companion, pages 111-112, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Covington, P., Adams, J., & Sargin, E.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Google, Mountain View, CA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-09-07
Pages
191-198
OpenAlex
W2512971201
Cited by
3,539
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 346 · 2025: 408 · 2024: 452 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 428 · 2021: 451 · 2020: 433 · 2019: 279 · 2018: 187 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
156.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
YouTube, recommender systems, deep neural network, candidate generation, ranking models, video recommendation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review