Cited by 350Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesScientific Computing and Data ManagementSoftware System Performance and Reliability

TFX: A TensorFlow-Based Production-Scale Machine Learning Platform

Open access
Baylor, Denis, Breck, Eric, Cheng, Heng-Tze, Fiedel, Noah, Foo, Chuan Yu, Haque, Zakaria, Haykal, Salem, Ispir, Mustafa +14 more·2017·Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

Creating and maintaining a platform for reliably producing and deploying machine learning models requires careful orchestration of many components---a learner for generating models based on training data, modules for analyzing and validating both data as well as models, and finally infrastructure for serving models in production. This becomes particularly challenging when data changes over time and fresh models need to be produced continuously. Unfortunately, such orchestration is often done ad hoc using glue code and custom scripts developed by individual teams for specific use cases, leading to duplicated effort and fragile systems with high technical debt.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3097983.3098021

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serving-related challenges are some of the ones most often reported in the literature, usually from a performance perspective.

    “Serving-related challenges are some of the ones most often reported in the literature [5-7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 20, 28, 34, 44, 53, 54], usually from a performance perspective.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Manasi Vartak, Harihar Subramanyam, Wei-En Lee, Srinidhi Viswanathan, Saadiyah Husnoo, Samuel Madden, and Matei Zaharia. 2016. ModelDB: a system for machine learning model management. In HILDA@SIGMOD. 14.
  2. Cassandra Xia, Clemens Mewald, D. Sculley, David So- ergel, George Roumpos, Heng-Tze Cheng, Illia Polosukhin, Jamie Alexander Smith, Jianwei Xie, Lichan Hong, Martin Wicke, Mustafa Ispir, Philip Daniel Tucker, Yuan Tang, and Zakaria Haque. 2017. Train and Distribute: Managing Simplicity vs. Flex- ibility in High-Level Machine Learning Frameworks. KDD (under review).
  3. Martin Zinkevich. 2016. Rules of Machine Learning. In NIPS Workshop on Reliable Machine Learning. Invited Talk.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baylor, D., Breck, E., Cheng, H.-T., Fiedel, N., Foo, C. Y., Haque, Z., Haykal, S., Ispir, M., Jain, V., Koc, L., Koo, C. Y., Lew, L., Mewald, C., Modi, A. N., Polyzotis, N., Ramesh, S., Roy, S., Whang, S. E., Wicke, M., Wilkiewicz, J., Zhang, X., & Zinkevich, M.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-08-13
Pages
1387-1395
OpenAlex
W2743948853
Cited by
350
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
27.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
Keywords
model deployment, machine learning pipelines, data validation, model validation, data drift, technical debt, MLOps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review