Post-Quantum Era Privacy Protection for Intelligent Infrastructures
Open accessAbstract
As we move into a new decade, the global world of Intelligent Infrastructure (II) services integrated into the Internet of Things (IoT) are at the forefront of technological advancements. With billions of connected devices spanning continents through interconnected networks, security and privacy protection techniques for the emerging II services become a paramount concern. In this paper, an up-to-date privacy method mapping and relevant use cases are surveyed for II services. Particularly, we emphasize on post-quantum cryptography techniques that may (or must when quantum computers become a reality) be used in the future through concrete products, pilots, and projects. The topics presented in this paper are of utmost importance as (1) several recent regulations such as Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have given privacy a significant place in digital society, and (2) the increase of IoT/II applications and digital services with growing data collection capabilities are introducing new threats and risks on citizens' privacy. This in-depth survey begins with an overview of security and privacy threats in IoT/IIs. Next, we summarize some selected Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) suitable for privacy-concerned II services, and then map recent PET schemes based on post-quantum cryptographic primitives which are capable of withstanding quantum computing attacks. This paper also overviews how PETs can be deployed in practical use cases in the scope of IoT/IIs, and maps some current projects, pilots, and products that deal with PETs. A practical case study on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is presented to demonstrate how PETs can be applied in reality. Finally, we discuss the main challenges with respect to current PETs and highlight some future directions for developing their post-quantum counterparts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health sector lifetimes (10-30 years) align with HIPAA (U.S.) and GDPR requirements mandating retention of medical records for extended periods.
“Health sector lifetimes (10-30 years) align with HIPAA (U.S.) and GDPR requirements mandating retention of medical records for extended periods [34,35].”
From Harvest-Now, Decrypt-Later: A Temporal Cybersecurity Risk in the Quantum Transition (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462 · see citing works
A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
Grover, L. K. (1996) · Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96 · doi:10.1145/237814.237866 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720 · see citing works
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250 · see citing works
Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router
Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., & Syverson, P. (2004) · doi:10.21236/ada465464 · Cited by 4,104 · see citing works
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7 · Cited by 3,001 · see citing works
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response
Erlingsson, Ú., Pihur, V., & Korolova, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2660267.2660348 · Cited by 1,838 · see citing works
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Tauman, Y. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45682-1_32 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
Solove, D. J. (2006) · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · doi:10.2307/40041279 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works
Towards Quantum-Resistant Cryptosystems from Supersingular Elliptic Curve Isogenies
Jao, D., & De Feo, L. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25405-5_2 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Introduction to post-quantum cryptography
Bernstein, D. J. (2009) · Post-Quantum Cryptography · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7_1 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Status report on the second round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Moody, D., Alagic, G., Apon, D. C., Cooper, D. A., Dang, Q. H., Kelsey, J. M., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C. A., Peralta, R. C., Perlner, R. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8309 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Privacy in Internet of Things: From Principles to Technologies
Li, C., & Palanisamy, B. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2864168 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Blockchain Technology and Neural Networks for the Internet of Medical Things
Polap, D., Srivastava, G., Jolfaei, A., & Parizi, R. M. (2020) · IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infocomwkshps50562.2020.9162735 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harvest-Now, Decrypt-Later: A Temporal Cybersecurity Risk in the Quantum Transition
Kagai, F., Branch, P., But, J., & Allen, R. (2025) · Telecom · doi:10.3390/telecom6040100 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Regulatory Mandates: Health sector lifetimes (10–30 years) align with HIPAA (U.S.) and GDPR requirements mandating retention of medical records for extended periods [34,35].”
- Authors
- Malina, L., Dzurenda, P., Ricci, S., Hajny, J., Srivastava, G., Matulevicius, R., Affia, A.-A. O., Laurent, M., Sultan, N. H., & Tang, Q.
- Affiliations
- Brno University of Technology (CZ)
- China Medical University (TW)
- University of Tartu (EE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 36038-36077
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135750780
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Brno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (830892, project SPARTA)
- Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic (VJ01030002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- post-quantum cryptography, privacy preservation, smart infrastructure, Internet of Things, privacy-enhancing technologies, Internet of Vehicles, quantum attacks, General Data Protection Regulation, IoT security threats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review