Cited by 42Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Multi-clue fusion for emotion recognition in the wild

Yan, Jingwei, Zheng, Wenming, Cui, Zhen, Tang, Chuangao, Zhang, Tong, Zong, Yuan, Sun, Ning·2016·Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Abstract

In the past three years, Emotion Recognition in the Wild (EmotiW) Grand Challenge has drawn more and more attention due to its huge potential applications. In the fourth challenge, aimed at the task of video based emotion recognition, we propose a multi-clue emotion fusion (MCEF) framework by modeling human emotion from three mutually complementary sources, facial appearance texture, facial action, and audio. To extract high-level emotion features from sequential face images, we employ a CNN-RNN architecture, where face image from each frame is first fed into the fine-tuned VGG-Face network to extract face feature, and then the features of all frames are sequentially traversed in a bidirectional RNN so as to capture dynamic changes of facial textures. To attain more accurate facial actions, a facial landmark trajectory model is proposed to explicitly learn emotion variations of facial components. Further, audio signals are also modeled in a CNN framework by extracting low-level energy features from segmented audio clips and then stacking them as an image-like map. Finally, we fuse the results generated from three clues to boost the performance of emotion recognition. Our proposed MCEF achieves an overall accuracy of 56.66% with a large improvement of 16.19% with respect to the baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2993148.2997630

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While handcrafted features are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that take advantage of complementarities between the two.

    “While they are typically outperformed by DNN-learned features in direct comparison, some challenge-winning models rely on hybrid architectures that can take advantage of complementarities between the two [152], [18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, J., Zheng, W., Cui, Z., Tang, C., Zhang, T., Zong, Y., & Sun, N.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-31
Pages
458-463
OpenAlex
W2548264631
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB351704)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130020)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61231002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
video-based emotion recognition, facial action units, audio features, CNN-RNN, VGG-Face

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review