Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
Abstract
Welcome to CSCW 2017, the ACM 2017 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing! We are excited to welcome the CSCW community back to Portland, Oregon, where the second CSCW conference was held in 1988. Both Portland and CSCW have matured a great deal during the intervening 29 years. We hope that you will find that Portland provides a stimulating environment for our conference. CSCW is the premier venue for presenting research in the design and use of technologies that affect groups, organizations, communities, and networks. Bringing together top researchers and practitioners from academia and industry, CSCW explores the technical, social, material, and theoretical challenges of designing technology to support collaborative work and life activities. CSCW welcomes a diverse range of topics and research methodologies. Studies often involve the development and application of novel technologies and/or ethnographic studies that inform design practice or theory. The mission of the conference is to share research that advances the state of human knowledge and improves both the design of systems and the ways they are used. The diversity of work in our conference program reflects the diversity of technology use in people's work, social, and civic lives as well as the geographic and cultural diversity of contributors. As many of you know, CSCW follows a rigorous "revise and resubmit" review process that uses peer review to improve submitted papers while maintaining a high-quality threshold for final acceptance. We also help prepare the next generation of reviewers with a mentorship program in which students review papers under the guidance of an experienced reviewer. This year we have the largest CSCW program ever. We had 530 submitted papers and 183 were accepted for presentation at the conference. The program also includes 4 papers published in ACM Transactions on Human- Computer Interaction (TOCHI). In addition, we will feature 14 workshops, 56 posters, 12 demos, and 3 panels. Lili Cheng of Microsoft Research will open the conference, speaking on "Conversational AI & Lessons Learned." Our closing plenary will feature Jorge Cham, the creator of PhD Comics, who will talk about, "The Science Gap." We also welcome Paul Luff and Christian Heath from King's College as the recipients of this year's CSCW Lasting Impact award for their influential 1998 paper, "Mobility in Collaboration."
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work on trust has determined that ability, benevolence, and integrity explain a large portion of trustworthiness.
“These were selected because prior work on trust has determined these elements explain a large portion of trustworthiness [36, 40].”
From A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding User Trust after Voice Assistant Failures (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques
Bondielli, A., & Marcelloni, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.035 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
The State of Speech in HCI: Trends, Themes and Challenges
Clark, L., Doyle, P., Garaialde, D., Gilmartin, E., Schlögl, S., Edlund, J., Aylett, M., Cabral, J., Munteanu, C., Edwards, J., et al. (2019) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwz016 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Chugunova, M., & Sele, D. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Mayo, O., Lavidor, M., & Gordon, I. (2021) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113391 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Owning Mistakes Sincerely: Strategies for Mitigating AI Errors
Mahmood, A., Fung, J. W., Won, I., & Huang, C.-M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517565 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The Role of Conversational Grounding in Supporting Symbiosis Between People and Digital Assistants
Cho, J., & Rader, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392838 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The qualculative dimension of healthcare data interoperability
Pine, K. H. (2019) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458219833095 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding User Trust after Voice Assistant Failures
Baughan, A., Wang, X., Liu, A., Mercurio, A., Chen, J., & Ma, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581152 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Zhang, S., Wang, H., & Yi, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757594 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Roque, R., Tamashiro, M. A., Mcconnell, K., & Granados, J. (2021) · Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3459990.3460728 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714120 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Alghamdi, E., Halvey, M., & Nicol, E. (2024) · ACM Conversational User Interfaces 2024 · doi:10.1145/3640794.3665558 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Crowdsourcing Thumbnail Captions: Data Collection and Validation
Aguirre, C., Cao, S., Mahmood, A., & Huang, C.-M. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3589346 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Rothschild, A., Booker, J., Davoll, C., Hill, J., Ivey, V., DiSalvo, C., Rydal Shapiro, B., & DiSalvo, B. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3516384 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-02-25
- OpenAlex
- W2913841425
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 67 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- computer-supported cooperative work, social computing, collaboration, human-computer interaction, ethnography, peer review, conversational AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review