Cited by 37Medical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

The qualculative dimension of healthcare data interoperability

Open access
Pine, Kathleen H·2019·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Research on interoperability and information exchange between information technology systems touts the use of secondary data for a variety of purposes, including research, management, quality improvement, and accountability. However, many studies have pointed out that this is difficult to achieve in practice. Hence, this article aims to examine the causes for this by reporting an ethnographic study of the data work performed by medical records coders and birth certificate clerks working in a hospital system to uncover the practices of creating administrative data (e.g. secondary data). The article illustrates that clerks and coders use situated qualitative judgments of the accuracy and authority of different primary medical accounts. Coders and clerks also employ their understandings of the importance of different future uses of data as they make crucial decisions about how much discretion to exercise in producing accurate data and how much effort to put toward clarifying problematic medical data. These findings suggest that information technology systems designed for interoperability and secondary data also need to be designed in ways that support the qualculative practices of data workers in order to succeed, including making future uses of data clear to data workers and finding ways to minimize conflicting data before data workers encounter it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458219833095

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Begoyan A. An overview of interoperability standards for electronic health records. In: Proceedings of the integrated design and process technology, Antalya, 2007. Dallas, TX: Society for Design and Process Science.
  2. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff 2005; 24: W5-W10.
  3. Callon M and Law J. On qualculation, agency, and otherness. Environ Plan D Soc Space 2005; 23(5): 717-733.
  4. Ryan A and Eklund P. A framework for semantic interoperability in healthcare: a service oriented archi- tecture based on health informatics standards. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 759-764.
  5. Botsis T, Hartvigsen G, Chen F, et al. Secondary use of EHR: data quality issues and informatics oppor- tunities. Summit on Translat Bioinforma 2010; 2010: 1-5.
  6. Pedersen R and Ellingsen G. The electronic patient record-sufficient quality for clinical research? In: Proceedings ECIS, Helsinki, 9-11 June 2011, pp. 274-286. Helsinki: AIS eLibrary.
  7. Berg M and Bowker G. The multiple bodies of the medical record. Sociol Quart 1997; 38(3): 513-537.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pine, K. H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pine, Kathleen H
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2019-04-19
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
536-548
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2939104293
Cited by
37
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems (1319897)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
health data interoperability, secondary data, administrative data, data work, qualitative judgment, data accuracy, discretion, data quality, information technology design
MeSH terms
Health Information Interoperability, Anthropology, Cultural, Birth Certificates, Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Information Systems, Interviews as Topic, Medical Record Administrators, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review