Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cache-conscious structure layout

Open access
Chilimbi, Trishul M., Hill, Mark D., Larus, James R.·1999·Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 conference on Programming language design and implementation

Abstract

Hardware trends have produced an increasing disparity between processor speeds and memory access times. While a variety of techniques for tolerating or reducing memory latency have been proposed, these are rarely successful for pointer-manipulating programs.This paper explores a complementary approach that attacks the source (poor reference locality) of the problem rather than its manifestation (memory latency). It demonstrates that careful data organization and layout provides an essential mechanism to improve the cache locality of pointer-manipulating programs and consequently, their performance. It explores two placement techniques---clustering and coloring---that improve cache performance by increasing a pointer structure's spatial and temporal locality, and by reducing cache-conflicts.To reduce the cost of applying these techniques, this paper discusses two strategies---cache-conscious reorganization and cache-conscious allocation---and describes two semi-automatic tools---ccmorph and ccmalloc---that use these strategies to produce cache-conscious pointer structure layouts. ccmorph is a transparent tree reorganizer that utilizes topology information to cluster and color the structure. ccmalloc is a cache-conscious heap allocator that attempts to co-locate contemporaneously accessed data elements in the same physical cache block. Our evaluations, with microbenchmarks, several small benchmarks, and a couple of large real-world applications, demonstrate that the cache-conscious structure layouts produced by ccmorph and ccmalloc offer large performance benefits---in most cases, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art prefetching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/301618.301633

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Chilimbi, T. M., Hill, M. D., & Larus, J. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 conference on Programming language design and implementation
Publisher
ACM
Published
1999-05
Pages
1-12
ISSN
1531-7102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116730320
Cited by
334
References
22
FWCI
16.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cache-conscious structure layout. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/301618.301633
The paper
Chilimbi, T. M., Hill, M. D., & Larus, J. R. (1999). Cache-conscious structure layout. Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 conference on Programming language design and implementation. https://doi.org/10.1145/301618.301633

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.