The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Implications for Adoption
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we explore the motivations for, and practicalities of, incorporating "implications for adoption" into HCI research practice. Implications for adoption are speculations which may be used in research projects to scrutinize and explore the implications and requirements associated with a technology's potential adoption in the future. There is a rich tradition within the HCI community of implementing, demonstrating, and testing new interactions or technologies by building prototypes. User-centered design methods help us to develop prototypes to and move toward designs that are validated, efficient, and rewarding to use. However, these studies rarely shift their temporal focus to consider, in any significant detail, what it would mean for a technology to exist beyond its prototypical implementation, in other words how these prototypes might ultimately be adopted. Given the CHI community's increasing interest in technology-related human and social effects, the lack of attention paid to adoption represents a significant and relevant gap in current practices. It is this gap that the paper addresses and in doing so offers three contributions: (1) exploring and unpacking different notions of adoption from varying disciplinary perspectives; (2) discussing why considering adoption is relevant and useful, specifically in HCI research; (3) discussing methods for addressing this need, specifically design fiction, and understanding how utilizing these methods may provide researchers with means to better understand the myriad of nuanced, situated, and technologically-mediated relationships that innovative designs facilitate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is what Gaver et al. [46] calls making design a “tool for raising topics or asking questions, while renouncing the possibility of dictating answers” i.e. design for ambiguity[46], for adoption [69], for appropriation [36] which can bring users like our artists into conversation with the technology.”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication
Kantowitz, B. H., & Suchman, L. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423221 · Cited by 5,307
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014003004 · Cited by 3,890
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Systems Competition and Network Effects
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · Cited by 2,646
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories
Greenberg, J. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306437 · Cited by 2,535
The De-scription of Technical Objects
Akrich, M. (1992) · HAL · Cited by 2,415
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Julian Bleecker . 2009 . Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory. Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory.
- Laura Buttrick and Conor Linehan. 2014. Fifty Shades of CHI?: The Perverse and Humiliating Human-Computer Relationship. 825--833. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2578874 · DOI
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby . 2013. Speculative Everything . The MIT Press , London . Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. The MIT Press, London.
- Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08: 111. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074 · DOI
- Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The big hole in HCI research. interactions 22 2: 48--51. http://doi.org/10.1145/2729103 · DOI
- Shaun Lawson Ben Kirman and Conor Linehan. 2016. Power participation and the dog internet. interactions 23 4: 37--41. http://doi.org/10.1145/2942442 · DOI
- Donald a. Norman. 2005. Human-centered design considered harmful. interactions 12 4: 14. http://doi.org/10.1145/1070960.1070976 · DOI
- Garry D Peterson Graeme S Cumming and Stephen R Carpenter. 2003. Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World. Essay 358 Conservation Biology Conservation Biology 17 2: 358--366. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523--1739.2003.01491.x · DOI
- 10.1002/for.850 · DOI
- Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press. Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press.
- Stuart Walker . 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design , Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury , London & New York , 460--461. Stuart Walker. 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design, Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury, London & New York, 460--461.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Kitamura, Y., Kitamura, Y., Quigley, A., Isbister, K., Igarashi, T., Japan, C. '. C. C. O. H. F. I. C. S. 2. Y., Association for Computing Machinery-Digital Library, ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction, & SIGs, A. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3411763 · Cited by 245
Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design Futuring
Kozubæv, S., Elsden, C., Howell, N., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Merrill, N., Schulte, B. F., & Wong, R. Y. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376526 · Cited by 189
More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things
Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. (2019) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320 · Cited by 162
Self-citationSøndergaard, M. L. J., & Hansen, L. K. (2018) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196766 · Cited by 139
Sketching & Drawing as Future Inquiry in HCI
Sturdee, M., & Lindley, J. (2019) · Halfway to the Future Symposium · doi:10.1145/3363384.3363402 · Cited by 131
Self-citationThe Adventures of Older Authors
Ambe, A. H., Brereton, M. F., Soro, A., Buys, L. R., & Roe, P. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300588 · Cited by 87
Infrastructural Speculations: Tactics for Designing and Interrogating Lifeworlds
Wong, R. Y., Khovanskaya, V. D., Fox, S., Merrill, N., & Sengers, P. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376515 · Cited by 99
A Translational Science Model for HCI
Colusso, L. F., Jones, R., Munson, S. A., & Hsieh, G. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300231 · Cited by 79
Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK
Cannizzaro, S., Procter, R., Ma, S.-N., & Maple, C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231615 · Cited by 70
Breaking Out of the Ivory Tower: A Large-scale Analysis of Patent Citations to HCI Research
Cao, H., Lu, Y., Deng, Y., McFarland, D. A., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581108 · Cited by 63
Ethical Considerations for Research Involving (Speculative) Public Data
Fiesler, C. (2019) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3370271 · Cited by 58
FlatMagic: Improving Flat Colorization through AI-driven Design for Digital Comic Professionals
Yan, C., Chung, J. J. Y., Kiheon, Y., Gingold, Y. I., Adar, E., & Hong, S.-S. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502075 · Cited by 51
Understanding the Boundaries between Policymaking and HCI
Spaa, A., Durrant, A. C., Elsden, C., & Vines, J. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300314 · Cited by 57
Researching AI Legibility through Design
Lindley, J., Akmal, H. A., Pilling, F. L., & Coulton, P. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376792 · Cited by 49
Self-citationTimelines: A World-Building Activity for Values Advocacy
Wong, R. Y., & Nguyen, T. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445447 · Cited by 43
Cambre, J., Reig, S., Kravitz, Q., & Kulkarni, C. (2020) · Conference on Designing Interactive Systems · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395479 · Cited by 30
Do, K., Pang, R. Y., Jiang, J., & Reinecke, K. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581347 · Cited by 51
Design Research and Object-Oriented Ontology
Lindley, J., Akmal, H. A., & Coulton, P. (2020) · Open Philosophy · doi:10.1515/opphil-2020-0002 · Cited by 39
Self-citationRapp, A. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103725 · Cited by 41
Benjamin, J. J., Lindley, J., Edwards, E., Rubegni, E., Korjakow, T., Grist, D., & Sharkey, R. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660677 · Cited by 32
Self-citationNot Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI Workflow
Long, T., Gero, K. I., & Chilton, L. B. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3661587 · Cited by 49
A Design Inquiry into Introspective AI: Surfacing Opportunities, Issues, and Paradoxes
Brand, N., Odom, W., & Barnett, S. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462000 · Cited by 32
Spimes Not Things. Creating A Design Manifesto For A Sustainable Internet of Things
Stead, M., Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. (2019) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1594936 · Cited by 30
Self-citationLet's Talk Futures: A Literature Review of HCI's Future Orientation
Sanchez, C., Wang, S., Savolainen, K., Epp, F. A., & Salovaara, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713759 · Cited by 30
Epp, F. A., Moesgen, T., Salovaara, A., Pouta, E. A. M., & Gaziulusoy, İ. (2022) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3532106.3534570 · Cited by 28
Wong, R. Y., Merrill, N., & Chuang, J. C.-I. (2018) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196746 · Cited by 33
Behavior Change Design Sprints
Colusso, L. F., Do, T., & Hsieh, G. (2018) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196739 · Cited by 28
Breaching the future: understanding human challenges of autonomous systems for the home
Nilsson, T., Crabtree, A., Fischer, J., & Koleva, B. N. (2019) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-019-01210-7 · Cited by 26
Internet of Things: realising the potential of a trusted smart world
Taylor, P. J., Allpress, S., Carr, M., Lupu, E., Norton, J., Smith, L., Blackstock, J. J., Boyes, H. A., Hudson‐Smith, A., Brass, I., et al. (2018) · Cited by 24
Self-citationCheon, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610103 · Cited by 24
Unpacking the Thinking and Making Behind a Slow Technology Research Product with Slow Game
Odom, W., Bertran, I., Hertz, G., Lin, H., Chen, A. Y. S., Harkness, M., & Wakkary, R. (2019) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3325480.3326567 · Cited by 23
Learning in the Panopticon: Examining the Potential Impacts of AI Monitoring on Students
Han, B., Buchanan, G., & Mckay, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3572921.3572937 · Cited by 20
Sailaja, N., Crabtree, A., Colley, J., Gradinar, A., Coulton, P., Forrester, I., Kerlin, L., & Stenton, P. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video · doi:10.1145/3317697.3323360 · Cited by 20
Self-citationml-machine.org: Infrastructuring a Research Product to Disseminate AI Literacy in Education
Bilstrup, K.-E. K., Kaspersen, M. H., Bouvin, N. O., & Petersen, M. G. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642539 · Cited by 28
BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologies
Pang, R. Y., Santy, S., Just, R., & Reinecke, K. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642054 · Cited by 19
Sturdee, M., Lindley, J., Linehan, C., Elsden, C., Kumar, N., Dillahunt, T. R., Mandryk, R. L., & Vines, J. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3441330 · Cited by 19
Self-citationZineography: A Community-Based Research-through-Design Method of Zine Making for Unequal Contexts
Hay, K., Durrant, A. C., Tariq, S., Coventry, L., & Anderson, H. (2024) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3679318.3685390 · Cited by 17
Sustainable Technological Futures
Stead, M., & Coulton, P. (2022) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3546155.3547283 · Cited by 24
Self-citationUsing Virtual Reality to Shape Humanity’s Return to the Moon: Key Takeaways from a Design Study
Nilsson, T., Rometsch, F. A. A. S. D. T., Becker, L., Dufresne, F., Demedeiros, P., Guerra, E., Casini, A. E. M., Vock, A., Gaeremynck, F., & Cowley, A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580718 · Cited by 24
The Ultimate Measure of Success for Speculative Design is to Disappear Completely
Lindley, J., & Green, D. P. (2021) · Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s) · doi:10.55612/s-5002-051-002 · Cited by 17
Self-citationLuu, T. V., van den Broeck, M., & Søndergaard, M. L. J. (2018) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3240167.3240270 · Cited by 15
Visual Methods for the Design of Shape-Changing Interfaces
Sturdee, M., Everitt, A., Lindley, J., Coulton, P., & Alexander, J. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_19 · Cited by 15
Self-citationKlassen, S., & Fiesler, C. L. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3567567 · Cited by 17
Opportunities and Barriers for Adoption of a Decision-Support Tool for Alzheimer’s Disease
Bellio, M., Furniss, D. J., Oxtoby, N. P., Garbarino, S., Firth, N. C., Ribbens, A., Alexander, D. C., & BLANDFORD, A. E. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3462764 · Cited by 14
Dove, G., Fernando, A., Hertz, K., Kim, J. R., Rizzo, J., Seiple, W., & Nov, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555622 · Cited by 16
Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research
Cha, I., Pillai, A. G., & Wong, R. Y. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660714 · Cited by 13
Seberger, J. S., Obi, I., Loukil, M., Liao, W., Wild, D. J., & Patil, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555586 · Cited by 12
Qadri, R., Mirowski, P., & Denton, R. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714049 · Cited by 12
“HCI has a rich tradition of locally situated studies of technology where scholars study what Lindley et al. [69] call the “implications for adoptions.”
Celik, A. T., & Kaya, Ç. (2025) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2025.103615 · Cited by 10
Mao, M., Blackwell, A. F., & Good, D. A. (2020) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwaa014 · Cited by 10
Asmar, K. E. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312852 · Cited by 10
”Would the smart cane benefit me?”: Perceptions of the Visually Impaired towards Smart Canes
Milallos, R., Tibdewal, V., Wang, Y., Udegbe, A. O., & Oh, T. T. (2021) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3441852.3476524 · Cited by 10
Understanding Socio-technical Factors Configuring AI Non-Use in UX Work Practices
Cha, I., & Wong, R. Y. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713140 · Cited by 26
Adesina, A. A., & Coulibaly, O. (1998) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.1998.tb00509.x · Cited by 9
Experiencing mundane AI futures
Pilling, M., Coulton, P., Lodge, T., Crabtree, A., & Chamberlain, A. (2022) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2022.283 · Cited by 9
Self-citationShadowMagic: Designing Human-AI Collaborative Support for Comic Professionals’ Shadowing
Ganguly, A., Yan, C., Chung, J. J. Y., Sun, T., Kiheon, Y., Gingold, Y. I., & Hong, S.-S. (2024) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676332 · Cited by 8
Experiencing the future mundane: configuring design fiction as breaching experiment
Crabtree, A., Lodge, T., Sailaja, N., Chamberlain, A., Coulton, P., Pilling, M., & Forrester, I. (2025) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2025.2454555 · Cited by 10
Self-citationTriangulating on Possible Futures: Conducting User Studies on Several Futures Instead of Only One
Salovaara, A., & Vahvelainen, L. (2024) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713565 · Cited by 10
Rasmussen, M. K., & Hemmert, F. (2019) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3340764.3344444 · Cited by 8
Gomez-Beldarrain, G., Verma, H., Kim, E., & Bozzon, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713978 · Cited by 11
To Distort or Not to Distort: Distance Cartograms in the Wild
Hong, S., Yoo, M.-J., Chinh, B., Han, A., Battersby, S., & Kim, J. (2018) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174202 · Cited by 9
Experiencing the Future Mundane
Coulton, P., Lindley, J., Gradinar, A., Colley, J., Sailaja, N., Crabtree, A., Forrester, I., & Kerlin, L. (2018) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 7
Self-citationRight to an Explanation Considered HarmfulPreprint
Crabtree, A., Urquhart, L., & Chen, J. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3384790 · Cited by 7
Utilization of Speculative Design for Designing Human-AI Interactions
Jang, S., & Nam, K. (2022) · Archives of Design Research · doi:10.15187/adr.2022.05.35.2.57 · Cited by 6
Responsible Innovation of Touchless Haptics: A Prospective Design Exploration in Social Interaction
Cornelio, P., Hughes, S., Georgiou, O., Frier, W., Maunsbach, M., Vasudevan, M. K., & Obrist, M. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581228 · Cited by 6
Rubambiza, G., Sengers, P., Weatherspoon, H., & Liu, J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642337 · Cited by 6
Namara, M., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479549 · Cited by 6
Signs of the Time: Making AI Legible
Lindley, J., Coulton, P., Akmal, H. A., & Pilling, F. L. (2020) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2020.237 · Cited by 6
Self-citationAVATAR 1, MEDIA AND SOCIO-TECHNOLOGICAL IMAGINARIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR HCI RESEARCH
Børsting, J., Culén, A. L., & Odom, W. (2019) · doi:10.33965/ict2019_201908l004 · Cited by 5
An Exploratory Study on the Low Adoption Rate of Smart Canes
Milallos, R., Tibdewal, V., Wang, Y., Udegbe, A. O., & Oh, T. T. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_36 · Cited by 5
What’s it like to be Alexa? An exploration of Artificial Intelligence as a Material for Design.
Pilling, F. L., & Coulton, P. (2020) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2020.218 · Cited by 5
Self-citationAllie, A., & Ajiboye, S. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Psychology · doi:10.33423/jop.v19i2.2041 · Cited by 4
From monitoring to engagement: Co-designing future technologies with older adults
Ambe, A. H. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.204265 · Cited by 4
More Attention, Transformation, Acceleration, and Exploration: Freelance Developers' Take on Hypes
Dolata, M., Lange, N., & Schwabe, G. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713097 · Cited by 3
Design Fiction: A Way to Foresee the Future of Human–Computer Interaction Design Challenges
Misra, S., Dhar, D., & Nandi, S. (2023) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0293-4_65 · Cited by 3
Towards the Adoption of Anti-spoofing ProtocolsPreprint
Hu, H., Peng, P., & Wang, G. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.06654 · Cited by 3
Reflections on using the story completion method in designing tangible user interfaces
Gooch, D., Bandara, A. K., Bennaceur, A., Giles, E., Harkin, L., Katz, D., Levine, M., Mehta, V., Nuseibeh, B., Stevenson, C., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103360 · Cited by 2
Making a Room for the IoT: a Domestic Demonstration
Lindley, J., Gradinar, A., Coulton, P., Cooper, R., & Forrester, I. (2019) · IET Living in the Internet of Things (IoT) · doi:10.1049/cp.2019.0162 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSurrealist Dreams of Artificial Intelligence: Revisiting Frederick Kiesler’s “Endless House”
Karabağ, Ç., & Tekin, İ. (2025) · Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s) · doi:10.55612/s-5002-064-006 · Cited by 2
Mao, M., & Good, D. A. (2018) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2018.47 · Cited by 2
Untangling multi-stakeholder perspectives in digital mental healthcare
Vallejos, E. P., Nilsson, T., Siebers, O., Siebert, P., Craven, M. P., & Fuentes, C. (2019) · Cited by 3
Interactive Perceptual Companion: Prototyping a Digital Perception for HAI
Akmal, H. A., Shaw, J., & Sandoval, E. B. (2022) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3527188.3563938 · Cited by 2
Boiling the frog: Ethical leniency due to prior exposure to technology
Ari, N., Jahan, N., Mell, J., & Wiśniewski, P. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-315991-6.00009-1 · Cited by 1
Increased Use of Asocial Technologies Is Associated with Reduced Well-being Among Older Adults
Anaraky, R. G., Schuster, A. M., Fossen, J. A. V., Nov, O., & Cotten, S. R. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713135 · Cited by 1
Six Degrees of Speculation: Towards a Taxonomy of Temporality
Snow, D., Linehan, C., Robinson, S., Ortega, A. G., Lindley, J., McDermott, F., Cowan, B. R., & Barry, M. (2025) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715668.3734169 · Cited by 1
Self-citationLindley, J., Coulton, P., & Cooper, R. (2017) · ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS Companion) · doi:10.1145/3064857.3079112
Self-citationStead, M., Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. (2019) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Self-citation“It’s Not that it Will Kill Me”: Living with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
Søndergaard, M. L. J., & Hansen, L. (2017) · Nordic design research conference · doi:10.21606/nordes.2017.039
Boess, S. U., Cheung, M., & Cain, R. (2020) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2020.1
Understanding and Tooling Translational Research in Human-Computer Interaction
Colusso, L. F. (2020) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Stranger Screens: Exploring the Application Themes for Interactive Freeform Devices
Serrano, M., Lucero, A., Irani, P., & Roudaut, A. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519707
Social Microbial Prosthesis - Towards Super-Organism Centered Design
Asmar, K. E. (2019) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/pom19.12
Ben-Meir, N. B., Dudek, L., Tomica, & Wilson, A. (2022) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/14703572221085869
Ari, N., Jahan, N., & Mell, J. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3514197.3549695
Interaction and Verisimilitude. How Narration Can Foster the Design Process
Salvo, A. D. (2023) · Springer series in design and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49811-4_73
User-centred design towards trust and engagement with agricultural climate services in Australia
Snow, S., & Wealands, K. (2024) · Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3726986.3727019
Do Users Even Care If Reused Smart Garments Reveal Earlier Users' Data?
Sanchez, C., Epp, F. A., & Salovaara, A. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790467
Wong, R. Y., Merrill, N., & Soden, R. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790941
Situated Imaginaries: Designing AI Futures with Computer Science Teaching Assistants
Barkhuff, G., Pruitt, I., Namani, V., Johnson, W. G., Bourgeois, A. G., Zegura, E. W., Borela, R., & Shapiro, B. R. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791874 · Cited by 1
Chen, K., Xue, X., Tan, R., Speed, C., Lee, K. M., & Lv, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7391666
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindley, J., Coulton, P., & Sturdee, M.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Pages
- 265-277
- OpenAlex
- W2601976332
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1)
- Research Councils UK (EP/G037582/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- technology adoption, design fiction, user-centered design, prototype, future of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
