The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Implications for Adoption
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we explore the motivations for, and practicalities of, incorporating "implications for adoption" into HCI research practice. Implications for adoption are speculations which may be used in research projects to scrutinize and explore the implications and requirements associated with a technology's potential adoption in the future. There is a rich tradition within the HCI community of implementing, demonstrating, and testing new interactions or technologies by building prototypes. User-centered design methods help us to develop prototypes to and move toward designs that are validated, efficient, and rewarding to use. However, these studies rarely shift their temporal focus to consider, in any significant detail, what it would mean for a technology to exist beyond its prototypical implementation, in other words how these prototypes might ultimately be adopted. Given the CHI community's increasing interest in technology-related human and social effects, the lack of attention paid to adoption represents a significant and relevant gap in current practices. It is this gap that the paper addresses and in doing so offers three contributions: (1) exploring and unpacking different notions of adoption from varying disciplinary perspectives; (2) discussing why considering adoption is relevant and useful, specifically in HCI research; (3) discussing methods for addressing this need, specifically design fiction, and understanding how utilizing these methods may provide researchers with means to better understand the myriad of nuanced, situated, and technologically-mediated relationships that innovative designs facilitate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is what Gaver et al. [46] calls making design a “tool for raising topics or asking questions, while renouncing the possibility of dictating answers” i.e. design for ambiguity[46], for adoption [69], for appropriation [36] which can bring users like our artists into conversation with the technology.”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication
Kantowitz, B. H., & Suchman, L. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423221 · Cited by 5,307
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014003004 · Cited by 3,890
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Systems Competition and Network Effects
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · Cited by 2,646
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories
Greenberg, J. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306437 · Cited by 2,535
The De-scription of Technical Objects
Akrich, M. (1992) · HAL · Cited by 2,415
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Julian Bleecker . 2009 . Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory. Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory.
- Laura Buttrick and Conor Linehan. 2014. Fifty Shades of CHI?: The Perverse and Humiliating Human-Computer Relationship. 825--833. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2578874 · DOI
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby . 2013. Speculative Everything . The MIT Press , London . Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. The MIT Press, London.
- Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08: 111. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074 · DOI
- Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The big hole in HCI research. interactions 22 2: 48--51. http://doi.org/10.1145/2729103 · DOI
- Shaun Lawson Ben Kirman and Conor Linehan. 2016. Power participation and the dog internet. interactions 23 4: 37--41. http://doi.org/10.1145/2942442 · DOI
- Donald a. Norman. 2005. Human-centered design considered harmful. interactions 12 4: 14. http://doi.org/10.1145/1070960.1070976 · DOI
- Garry D Peterson Graeme S Cumming and Stephen R Carpenter. 2003. Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World. Essay 358 Conservation Biology Conservation Biology 17 2: 358--366. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523--1739.2003.01491.x · DOI
- 10.1002/for.850 · DOI
- Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press. Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press.
- Stuart Walker . 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design , Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury , London & New York , 460--461. Stuart Walker. 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design, Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury, London & New York, 460--461.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Eiband, M., Garcia, E., & Stampf, A. (2026) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3828157.3828766
Mediating More-Than-Human Encounters Across Spatio-Temporal Distance
Ben-Meir, N. B., Hong, H., Oka, M., Clarke, K. E., Masters, S., Healey, P. G. T., Kobayashi, H. H., & Deterding, S. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3829807.3829875
Chen, P.-H., & Chang, W.-L. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3829807.3829834
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindley, J., Coulton, P., & Sturdee, M.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Pages
- 265-277
- OpenAlex
- W2601976332
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1)
- Research Councils UK (EP/G037582/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- technology adoption, design fiction, user-centered design, prototype, future of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
