The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Implications for Adoption
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we explore the motivations for, and practicalities of, incorporating "implications for adoption" into HCI research practice. Implications for adoption are speculations which may be used in research projects to scrutinize and explore the implications and requirements associated with a technology's potential adoption in the future. There is a rich tradition within the HCI community of implementing, demonstrating, and testing new interactions or technologies by building prototypes. User-centered design methods help us to develop prototypes to and move toward designs that are validated, efficient, and rewarding to use. However, these studies rarely shift their temporal focus to consider, in any significant detail, what it would mean for a technology to exist beyond its prototypical implementation, in other words how these prototypes might ultimately be adopted. Given the CHI community's increasing interest in technology-related human and social effects, the lack of attention paid to adoption represents a significant and relevant gap in current practices. It is this gap that the paper addresses and in doing so offers three contributions: (1) exploring and unpacking different notions of adoption from varying disciplinary perspectives; (2) discussing why considering adoption is relevant and useful, specifically in HCI research; (3) discussing methods for addressing this need, specifically design fiction, and understanding how utilizing these methods may provide researchers with means to better understand the myriad of nuanced, situated, and technologically-mediated relationships that innovative designs facilitate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is what Gaver et al. [46] calls making design a “tool for raising topics or asking questions, while renouncing the possibility of dictating answers” i.e. design for ambiguity[46], for adoption [69], for appropriation [36] which can bring users like our artists into conversation with the technology.”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication
Kantowitz, B. H., & Suchman, L. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423221 · Cited by 5,307
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014003004 · Cited by 3,890
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Systems Competition and Network Effects
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · Cited by 2,646
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories
Greenberg, J. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306437 · Cited by 2,535
The De-scription of Technical Objects
Akrich, M. (1992) · HAL · Cited by 2,415
The sociology of expectations in science and technology
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & van Lente, H. (2006) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320600777002 · Cited by 2,118
Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5390 · Cited by 1,952
From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901883022002003 · Cited by 1,951
Talking about tactile experiences
Obrist, M., Seah, S. A., & Subramanian, S. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466220 · Cited by 1,634
Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)91604-0 · Cited by 1,549
Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249590 · Cited by 1,525
Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity
Schilling, M. A. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3312918 · Cited by 1,511
Benbasat, I., Barki, H., & Montréal, H. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00126 · Cited by 1,456
Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World
Peterson, G., Cumming, G. S., & Carpenter, S. R. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x · Cited by 1,382
The computer for the 21 st century
Weiser, M. (1999) · ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review · doi:10.1145/329124.329126 · Cited by 1,234
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. '. (2005) · Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility · doi:10.1145/1094562.1094569 · Cited by 1,030
Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials
Woolgar, S. (1990) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03349.x · Cited by 935
Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model
Lin, C., Shih, H., & Sher, P. J.-H. (2007) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20177 · Cited by 891
Dourish, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124855 · Cited by 860
How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies
Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2003) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 839
Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change
Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2013) · Design Issues · doi:10.1162/desi_a_00250 · Cited by 775
Speculative design: crafting the speculation
Auger, J. (2013) · Digital Creativity · doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.767276 · Cited by 760
Domestication of media and technology
Berker, T. (2005) · Cited by 669
Sienkiewicz, H. (1895) · Cited by 669
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Theories and Models
Dillon, A. P., & Morris, M. G. (1996) · Cited by 621
Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time)
Greenberg, S., & Buxton, B. (2008) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357074 · Cited by 601
Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design
Dunne, A. (1999) · Cited by 567
Kline, R. R., & Pinch, T. (1996) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3107097 · Cited by 566
Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry
Bresnahan, T. F., & Greenstein, S. M. (1999) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00088 · Cited by 534
Human-centered design considered harmful
Norman, D. A. (2005) · interactions · doi:10.1145/1070960.1070976 · Cited by 487
Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision
Bell, G., & Dourish, P. (2006) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0071-x · Cited by 456
Research through design fiction
Blythe, M. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557098 · Cited by 427
The Internet Engineering Task Force
Needleman, M. H. (2000) · Serials Review · doi:10.1016/s0098-7913(99)00073-8 · Cited by 410
How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology
Krige, J. (2006) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/009430610603500121 · Cited by 409
Garud, R. B., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140504 · Cited by 408
Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change
Gieryn, T. F., Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1994) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3106331 · Cited by 390
Kirby, D. A. (2009) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312709338325 · Cited by 381
Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career
Grove, A. S. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 342
Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory
van Lente, H., Spitters, C., & Peine, A. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004 · Cited by 334
Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice
Buchanan, R. (1985) · Design Issues · doi:10.2307/1511524 · Cited by 319
Gaver, W. W., & Martin, H. (2000) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/332040.332433 · Cited by 293
From Research Prototype to Research Product
Odom, W., Wakkary, R., Lim, Y.-K., Desjardins, A., Hengeveld, B., & Banks, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858447 · Cited by 259
Gallagher, S. R., & Park, S. H. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.985749 · Cited by 199
Yong, L., Gonçalves, J., Ferreira, D., Xiao, B., Hosio, S. J., & Kostakos, V. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2556969 · Cited by 175
Ethnography considered harmful
Crabtree, A., Rodden, T. A., Tolmie, P., & Button, G. (2009) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518835 · Cited by 149
Generating implications for design through design research
Sas, C., Whittaker, S., Dow, S. P., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557357 · Cited by 134
Markussen, T., & Knutz, E. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2513506.2513531 · Cited by 126
Localized technological change and the evolution of standards as economic institutions
Antonelli, C. (1994) · Information Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/0167-6245(94)90002-7 · Cited by 114
Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design
Lawson, S. W., Kirman, B. J., Linehan, C., Feltwell, T., & Hopkins, L. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702260 · Cited by 107
Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction
Lindley, J., & Coulton, P. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858446 · Cited by 105
Self-citationLinehan, C., Kirman, B. J., Reeves, S., Blythe, M., Tanenbaum, T. J., Desjardins, A., & Wakkary, R. (2014) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2559206.2560472 · Cited by 100
Multicriteria methods for technology foresight
Salo, A. A., Gustafsson, T., & Ramanathan, R. (2003) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.850 · Cited by 92
Responding to cognitive overload : Co-adaptation between users and technology
Mackay, W. E. (2000) · Intellectica Revue de l Association pour la Recherche Cognitive · doi:10.3406/intel.2000.1597 · Cited by 86
Virtual humans for validating maintenance procedures
Badler, N. I., Erignac, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2002) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/514236.514264 · Cited by 83
Technology foresight—past and future
Salo, A. A., & Cuhls, K. E. (2003) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.846 · Cited by 83
Design fiction as world building
Coulton, P., Lindley, J., Sturdee, M., & Stead, M. (2017) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 80
Self-citationSøndergaard, M. L. J., & Hansen, L. K. (2016) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/2971485.2996748 · Cited by 72
Blythe, M., Steane, J., Roe, J. J., & Oliver, C. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702491 · Cited by 69
Lindley, J., & Coulton, P. (2015) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/2793107.2810300 · Cited by 67
Self-citationMaking Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera
Pierce, J., & Paulos, E. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702405 · Cited by 64
The Co-ordinates of Design Fiction
Blythe, M., & Encinas, E. (2016) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/2957276.2957299 · Cited by 64
Gilbert, R. J. (2001) · Cited by 60
Kostakos, V. (2015) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2729103 · Cited by 60
From User-Centered to Adoption-Centered Design
Chilana, P. K., Ko, A. J., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702412 · Cited by 59
Blackwell, A. F. (2015) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2702613.2732505 · Cited by 58
Games as Speculative Design: Allowing Players to Consider Alternate Presents and Plausible Features
Coulton, P., Burnett, D. J., & Gradinar, A. (2016) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2016.15 · Cited by 57
Self-citationTechnology Transfer from University to Industry
Lee, Y., & Gaertner, R. (1994) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01476.x · Cited by 57
The use of scenarios in human-computer interaction research
Young, R. M., & Barnard, P. J. (1986) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/29933.275645 · Cited by 56
When a Product Is Still Fictional
Wong, R. Y., & Mulligan, D. K. (2016) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2901790.2901801 · Cited by 53
Power, participation, and the dog internet
Lawson, S. W., Kirman, B. J., & Linehan, C. (2016) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2942442 · Cited by 53
CHI and the future robot enslavement of humankind
Kirman, B. J., Linehan, C., Lawson, S. W., & O'Hara, D. (2013) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2468356.2468740 · Cited by 50
Waves of power: dynamics of global technology leadership, 1964-2010
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0378 · Cited by 48
Sturdee, M., Coulton, P., Lindley, J., Stead, M., Akmal, H. A., & Hudson‐Smith, A. (2016) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892574 · Cited by 47
Self-citationThe Future As Practice A Framework To Understand Anticipation In Science And Technology
Palavicino, C. A. (2015) · Tecnoscienza · doi:10.5281/zenodo.437887 · Cited by 44
Design Fiction: Does the search for plausibility lead to deception?
Coulton, P., Lindley, J., & Akmal, H. A. (2016) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2016.148 · Cited by 41
Self-citationJärvenpää, H. M., & Mäkinen, S. (2008) · doi:10.1109/ieem.2008.4737823 · Cited by 37
Evolution and revolution in open systems
Cargill, C. F. (1994) · StandardView · doi:10.1145/224145.224146 · Cited by 37
Human-computer interaction as science
Reeves, S. (2015) · Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing · doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21296 · Cited by 36
Crabtree, A., Chamberlain, A., Davies, M., Glover, K., Reeves, S., Rodden, T. A., Tolmie, P., & Jones, M. (2013) · Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly) · doi:10.1145/2499149.2499150 · Cited by 34
The use of scenarios in human-computer interaction research
Young, R. M., & Barnard, P. J. (1986) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1165387.275645 · Cited by 32
Isaacs, E. A., & Tang, J. C. (1996) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/234215.234463 · Cited by 21
Dalton, N. S., Moreau, R., & Adams, R. K. (2016) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892572 · Cited by 18
Buttrick, L., Linehan, C., Kirman, B. J., & O'Hara, D. (2014) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2559206.2578874 · Cited by 17
Heibeck, F., Hope, A., & Legault, J. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2660579.2660585 · Cited by 17
Filling the big hole in HCI research
Blackwell, A. F. (2015) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2830317 · Cited by 14
Encinas, E., & Blythe, M. (2016) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892589 · Cited by 14
Stead, M. (2016) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2016.455 · Cited by 13
Beebots-a-lula, Where's My Honey?
Edwards, L., Maxwell, D., Pillatt, T., & Downing, N. (2016) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/2971485.2993924 · Cited by 7
The ISO Reference Model of Open Systems Interconnection
Miller, L. J. (1981) · ACM Annual Conference · doi:10.1145/800175.809901 · Cited by 6
Rambus v. Infineon: Patent Disclosures in Standard-Setting Organizations
Alban, D. (2004) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z38r69m · Cited by 6
Quo vadisventricular tachycardia ablation: new horizons and developments
Dickfeld, T. L. (2011) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/erd.10.82 · Cited by 4
Sans duty - making tax visible : Seed fund project report
Duggan, J. R., & Lindley, J. (2015) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Julian Bleecker . 2009 . Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory. Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory.
- Laura Buttrick and Conor Linehan. 2014. Fifty Shades of CHI?: The Perverse and Humiliating Human-Computer Relationship. 825--833. http://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2578874 · DOI
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby . 2013. Speculative Everything . The MIT Press , London . Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. The MIT Press, London.
- Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08: 111. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074 · DOI
- Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The big hole in HCI research. interactions 22 2: 48--51. http://doi.org/10.1145/2729103 · DOI
- Shaun Lawson Ben Kirman and Conor Linehan. 2016. Power participation and the dog internet. interactions 23 4: 37--41. http://doi.org/10.1145/2942442 · DOI
- Donald a. Norman. 2005. Human-centered design considered harmful. interactions 12 4: 14. http://doi.org/10.1145/1070960.1070976 · DOI
- Garry D Peterson Graeme S Cumming and Stephen R Carpenter. 2003. Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World. Essay 358 Conservation Biology Conservation Biology 17 2: 358--366. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523--1739.2003.01491.x · DOI
- 10.1002/for.850 · DOI
- Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press. Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. The MIT Press.
- Stuart Walker . 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design , Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury , London & New York , 460--461. Stuart Walker. 2013. Imagination's Promise: Practice-Based Design, Research for Sustainability. In The Handbook for Design Sustainability, Stuart Walker and Jacques Giard (eds.). Bloomsbury, London & New York, 460--461.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Kitamura, Y., Kitamura, Y., Quigley, A., Isbister, K., Igarashi, T., Japan, C. '. C. C. O. H. F. I. C. S. 2. Y., Association for Computing Machinery-Digital Library, ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction, & SIGs, A. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3411763 · Cited by 245
Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design Futuring
Kozubæv, S., Elsden, C., Howell, N., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Merrill, N., Schulte, B. F., & Wong, R. Y. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376526 · Cited by 189
More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things
Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. (2019) · The Design Journal · doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320 · Cited by 162
Self-citationSøndergaard, M. L. J., & Hansen, L. K. (2018) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196766 · Cited by 139
Sketching & Drawing as Future Inquiry in HCI
Sturdee, M., & Lindley, J. (2019) · Halfway to the Future Symposium · doi:10.1145/3363384.3363402 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindley, J., Coulton, P., & Sturdee, M.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Pages
- 265-277
- OpenAlex
- W2601976332
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1)
- Research Councils UK (EP/G037582/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- technology adoption, design fiction, user-centered design, prototype, future of technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
