Cited by 35Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Relevance of learning analytics to measure and support students' learning in adaptive educational technologies

Open access
Bannert, Maria, Molenaar, Inge, Azevedo, Roger, Järvelä, Sanna, Gašević, Dragan·2017·Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference

Abstract

In this poster, we describe the aim and current activities of the EARLI-Centre for Innovative Research (E-CIR) "Measuring and Supporting Student's Self-Regulated Learning in Adaptive Educational Technologies" which is funded by the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) from 2015 to 2019. The aim is to develop our understanding of multimodal data that unobtrusively capture cognitive, meta-cognitive, affective and motivational states of learners over time. This demands for a concerted interdisciplinary dialogue combining findings from psychology and educational sciences with advances in computer sciences and artificial intelligence. The participants in this E-CIR are leading international researchers who have articulated different emerging perspectives and methodologies to measure cognition, metacognition, motivation, and emotions during learning. The participants recognize the need for intensive collaboration to accelerate progress with new interdisciplinary methods including learning analytics to develop more powerful adaptive educational technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3027385.3029463

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bannert, M., Molenaar, I., Azevedo, R., Järvelä, S., & Gašević, D.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-03-13
Pages
568-569
OpenAlex
W2587531416
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
EARLI
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
learning analytics, adaptive educational technologies, student self-regulation, metacognition, student motivation, affective states, multimodal data, unobtrusive measurement, cognitive states, interdisciplinary research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review