The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
29 No basis given · 22 Own result · 19 Own interpretation · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces the top-1 and top-5 error rates by 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, as compared with the non overlapping scheme s = 2, z = 2, which produces output of equivalent dimensions.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increases the size of our training set by a factor of 2048”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deep CNNs with ReLUs train several times faster than their equivalents with tanh units.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we still find that the following local normalization scheme aids generalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the 1000 classes of ILSVRC make each training example impose 10 bits of constraint on the mapping from image to label, this turns out to be insufficient to learn so many parameters without considerable overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5. REDUCING OVERFITTING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“though the resulting training examples are, of course, highly inter dependent.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generally observe during training that models with overlapping pooling find it slightly more difficult to overfit.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a four-layer CNN achieved a 13% test e r r o r r a t e w i t h o u t n o r m a l i z a t i o n a n d 1 1 % w i t h normalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so we used several effective techniques for preventing overfitting”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response normalization reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-GPU net takes slightly less time to train than the one-GPU net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network contains a number of new and unusual features which improve its performance and reduce its training time”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this scheme, our network suffers from substantial overfitting, which would have forced us to use much smaller networks.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, only other types of cat are considered plausible labels for the leopard.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This initialization accelerates the early stages of learning by providing the ReLUs with positive inputs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 6. DETAILS OF LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that at the pixel level, the retrieved training images are generally not close in L2 to the query images in the first column.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Training one CNN, with an extra sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer, to classify the entire ImageNet Fall 2011 release (15M images, 22K categories), and then”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our top-1 and top-5 error rates on this dataset are 67.4% and 40.9%, attained by the net described above but with an additional, sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of specialization occurs during every run and is independent of any particular random weight initialization (modulo a renumbering of the GPUs).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magnitude of the effect demonstrated here varies with network architecture, but networks with ReLUs consistently learn several times faster than equivalents with saturating neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 9. EPILOGUE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network achieves top-1 and top-5 test set error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Averaging the predictions of five similar CNNs gives an error rate of 16.4%.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remainder of this paragraph, we use validation and test error rates interchangeably because in our experience they do not differ by more than 0.1% (see Table 2).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that even off-center objects, such as the mite in the top-left, can be recognized by the net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of our experiments suggest that our results can be improved simply by waiting for faster GPUs and bigger datasets to become available.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ReLUs have the desirable property that they do not require input normalization to prevent them from saturating.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute one such class of models.9,15,17,19,21,26,32”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 4 (1980), 193-202. source
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Krizhevsky, A. Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
- Not checked yetcites [17] 17. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1990).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the immense complexity of the object recognition task means that this problem cannot be specified even by a dataset as large as ImageNet, so our model should also have lots of prior knowledge to compensate for all the data we do not have.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, compared to standard feedforward neural networks with similarly sized layers, CNNs have much fewer connections and parameters and so they are easier to train, while their theoretically best performance is likely to be only slightly worse.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“methods that require careful hand-engineering by a programmer who understands the domain do not scale as well as methods that replace the programmer with a powerful general-purpose learning procedure.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Luckily, current GPUs, paired with a highly optimized implementation of 2D convolution, are powerful enough to facilitate the training of interestinglylarge CNNs”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they also make strong and mostly correct assumptions about the nature of images (namely, stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel dependencies).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the attractive qualities of CNNs, and despite the relative efficiency of their local architecture, they have still been prohibitively expensive to apply in large scale to highresolution images.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ImageNet, 7 which consists of over 15 million labeled high-resolution images in over 22,000 categories.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] 7. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR09 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With enough computation and enough data, learning beats programming for complicated tasks that require the integration of many different, noisy cues.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and recent datasets such as ImageNet contain enough labeled examples to train such models without severe overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for deep neural networks to shine, they needed far more labeled data and hugely more computation.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If at least some training examples produce a positive input to a ReLU, learning will happen in that neuron.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn about thousands of objects from millions of images, we need a model with a large learning capacity.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constants k, n, α, and β are hyperparameters whose values are determined using a validation set”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, on this dataset the primary concern is preventing overfitting, so the effect they are observing is different from the accelerated ability to fit the training set which we report when using ReLUs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since then the best published results are 45.7% and 25.7% with an approach that averages the predictions of two classifiers trained on Fisher Vectors (FVs) computed from two types of densely sampled features.29”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] 29. Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F. High- dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 (2011). IEEE, 1665-1672. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it appears to be too expensive for big neural networks that already take several days to train.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The best published results on this dataset are 78.1% and 60.9%.23”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., Csurka, G. Metric learning for large scale image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. In ECCV -European Conference on Computer Vision (Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability.
“But objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability”
The paper relies on this without support.
Object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of illumination.
“object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of the illumination.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
“Since there is no established test set, our split necessarily differs from the splits used by previous authors, but this does not affect the results appreciably.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krizhevesky et al. [30] first proposed AlexNet and consequently improved the CNN learning ability by increasing its depth and implementing several parameter optimization strategies.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In deep CNN architecture, AlexNet is highly respected [30], as it achieved innovative results in the fields of image recognition and classification.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many CNN models, e.g. AlexNet [30], GoogleNet [103], and ResNet [37], have been trained on large datasets such as ImageNet for image recognition purposes.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To avoid model-specific biases, two different AI models, AlexNet [22] and VGG16 [38], were selected for classification.”
From Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice of this specific size is based on the fact that the AlexNet 34 (and also similar CNN architectures) has been shown to offer satisfactory performances with an input matrix of that size or very similar, albeit for different types of problems with respect to the one presented in this work (e.g., image classification).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Jung et al. [21] found that a reduction in accuracy does not occur when using only four bits for both weight and activation parameters, even for the ImageNet dataset [32].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feature-based approaches [17,18,19] commonly employ networks pre-trained on ImageNet [20] to map original images into a more distinguishable feature space. These methods are typically characterized by low training costs and outstanding performance.”
From An Unsupervised Method for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection with Vision Transformer-Based Autoencoder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Over the past several years, the successes of deep learning on visual tasks has critically relied on convolutional neural networks [20, 16].”
From Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A common perception metric is the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) which uses pre-trained deep neural network backbones such as VGG [9] and AlexNet [22].”
From MTReD: 3D Reconstruction Dataset for Fly-over Videos of Maritime Domain (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with the the success of AlexNet [5] in the ILSVRC challenge [6] in 2012, deep learning models have been outperforming traditional approaches on a number of computer vision problems.”
From Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, it has been acknowledged that the performance of those hashing schemes may degrade significantly if the projected dimensions are imbalanced [4], [6], [13], i.e., their variances vary a lot.”
From Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When convolutional RBMs are stacked together, they form convolutional deep belief networks [22].”
From Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“When a low-capacity model, such as AlexNet, is used for pre-training, little improvement can be obtained when compared to the Resnet50 family [26].”
From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Since its introduction by Krizhevsky et al. [7] in 2012, the CNN model has been successfully applied to a wide range of multimodal applications, such as image dehazing [239, 240] and human activity recognition [241].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The AlexNet architecture was published in [4], achieved significantly improved performance over the other non-deep learning methods for ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2012.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach.”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“Since then, fueled by the revolutionary results of AlexNet [101] and incarnations of patch-based adaptations of Deep Boltzmann Machines and stacked autoencoders, deep learning based segmentation of anatomy and pathology has witnessed a revolution (see also Table II), where for some tasks now we observe human level performance [102].”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“ReLU significantly increases the rate of con-vergence of stochastic gradient descent in comparison with the sigmoid [26].”
From Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Real-time volume estimation has been achieved using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) [11] to produce state-of-the-art performance in a range of medical imaging modalities [12].”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.5. Overall architecture
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 106,701–106,800 of 108,435
Feature Necessity and Relevancy in Machine Learning Explanations
Huang, X., Cooper, M., Morgado, A., Planes, J., & Marques-Silva, J. P. (2026) · Journal of Automated Reasoning · doi:10.1007/s10817-026-09748-x · Cited by 2
Image-based Waste Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks on Diverse Image Data
Daoud, M., Mubarak, S., Yau, F. I., et al. (2025) · 2025 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) · doi:10.1109/aset66891.2025.11428008
“A detailed architectural overview for each CNN model are provided below: • The AlexNet [15] • The VGG-16 [17] model is a deep convolutional neural network characterized by a simple and uniform architecture.”
Makarenya, T., Mannaa, A. S., Kalinichenko, A. I., & Владимировна, П. С. (2026) · International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.2478/ijssis-2026-2018
Deep metric learning for explainable glaucoma diagnosis
Bogacki, P., Arnay, R., Sigut, J., & Díaz-Alemán, T. (2026) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae5500
“Deep Learning Models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [18] or visual transformers [19] are commonly used to analyze medical images like optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans or eye fundus images.”
Yuan, Y., Sun, R., Liao, L., Li, J., Ma, S., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Huang, H., & Song, W. (2026) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121199
Clink, D. J., Cross‐Jaya, H., Kim, J., Ahmad, A. H., Hong, M., Sala, R., Birot, H., Agger, C., Vu, T. T., Nguyen, H. T., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.70127 · Cited by 3
“…comprised of 1085 gibbon samples and 1748 noise samples that were automatically detected using early experiments with a binary AlexNet architecture (Krizhevsky et al. 2017) trained on the full dataset in the “torch for R” ecosystem (Falbel 2022 The different model architectures (e.g., ResNet50 and…”
Real-Time Monitoring & Protection Against Malicious Attacks in IoT Security Frameworks
Vijaya, C. S., Aruna, T., Yashaswini, K. Y., Reddy, K. S. N., Sai, R. R. V., & Adithya, N. (2026) · International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech) · doi:10.1109/iementech202669403.2026.11434401
An Autonomous, Privacy-Preserving Emergency Response System Using on-Device AI
Umanesan, R., Harikrishnan, J., Lal, Y., et al. (2026) · 2026 9th International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech) · doi:10.1109/iementech202669403.2026.11434369
Saim, M., & Feroui, A. (2026) · Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219519426500107
Huang, J., & Xian, J. (2026) · Journal of Scientific Computing · doi:10.1007/s10915-026-03235-6
A bearing fault diagnosis method based on continuous wavelet transform and an SPDSwin Transformer
Liu, T., Jing, X., Liu, P., & Hao, F. (2026) · Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2025-0202
Wang, H.-Y., & Sun, J. C. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13894-5
“Such techniques enable real-time engagement classification and performance prediction through image analysis (Ahmad et al., 2023 ; Krizhevsky et al., 2017 ; Vanneste et al., 2021) and the associations between academic outcomes as well as physiological responses and kinetic motions such as heart…”
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, X., Wang, X., Kong, D., Prodhan, F. A., Ali, S., & Ullah, H. (2026) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2026.104914
Wang, Y.-C., Chen, W.-C., Lin, K.-P., et al. (2026) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-026-02278-3
“Recent advances in deep learning, a subset of artificial intelligence based on multi-layer neural networks, have significantly improved automated medical image analysis [6].”
Hao, S.-Q., Dou, C., Weng, D., et al. (2025) · 2025 5th International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical Engineering (EPEE) · doi:10.1109/epee67527.2025.11428642
“Krizhevsky et al. [4] pioneered basic image augmentation, substantially improving classification accuracy – an approach adopted in VGGNet [5].”
Securing RRAM-Based Neural Networks Via Neuron-Level Activation-Triggered Perturbation
Zhao, X., Chen, X., Zhang, S., Sun, J., Wang, J., & Chen, S. (2026) · Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers · doi:10.1142/s021812662650194x
Ameur, A. B., Ladhari, T., & Saïd, S. H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Advances in Data-Driven Analytics and Intelligent Systems (ADACIS) · doi:10.1109/adacis65663.2025.11437022
Yu, W., Li, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2026) · Signal Processing Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2026.117540
Fangyu, 韩. H., Fuquan, 吕. L., Haocheng, 瞿. Q., et al. (2026) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop252238
Panjetha, H., & Jadon, J. S. (2025) · International Conference on Advances in Computation, Communication and Information Technology (ICAICCIT) · doi:10.1109/icaiccit68829.2025.11434463
“Pixel values are normalized using ImageNet [18] mean & std. Table II shows the data augmentation results.”
Huang, D., guo, G., Yang, J., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6448479
MTCA‐Net: Multi‐Task Cascade Analysis Network for Real‐Time Sperm Quality Analysis
Li, J., Sun, W., He, J., et al. (2026) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202501452
“Early object detection models, such as AlexNet [77], employ max pooling for downsam-pling, which leads to the loss of spatial detail information and cannot extract features as accurately as traditional convolution.”
Sangeet: A Music Recommendation System Using Facial Emotion Recognition
Sanghvi, D., Vadhar, D., Jain, H., Bhanushali, D., & Sharma, R. (2026) · Biennial International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE) · doi:10.1109/icnte66387.2026.11437511
“In real-time detection tests, Haar Cascade/Viola Jones classifier did a better job out of other classifiers due to its broad application scope and low computation rate [14], [17], and [19].”
InfluentialZhang, Y., Gao, H., Leng, T.-T., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1763437
Defect classification for steel surfaces under multiple illumination through cross-reconstruction
Park, S., & Cho, S. I. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-026-11955-x
Saif, Y. A. M., Rus, A. Z. M., Yusof, Y., Gu, Y. H., Al‐masni, M. A., Alzaeemi, S. A., Al-Qershi, O. M., Altharan, Y. M., & Al-Alimi, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0342797
“Subsequent CNN models, such as AlexNet [31], GoogleNet [32], and ResNet [33] have progressively enhanced classification accuracy on ImageNet [34], driving extensive research and application in object detection, semantic segmentation, and other image-processing domains [35].”
Lazauskas, A., Ishafaq, M. U. U., Abakevičienė, B., et al. (2026) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2026.171519
XAI-Enhanced MobileNetV2 Dashboard for Real-Time ISRO Satellite Terrain Classification
Nishane, D. P., Nishane, O. P., Nandanwar, R. P., & Puri, C. (2026) · International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN) · doi:10.1109/icipcn67432.2026.11438754
“Their approach to creating the gradient flows enables the generation of heatmaps that facilitate XAI, a requirement identified for transparent AI in highly instrumental tasks, such as satellite navigation [11].”
Kaviya, S., Kirthika, M., Senthilkumar, S., et al. (2026) · 2026 6th International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN) · doi:10.1109/icipcn67432.2026.11438730
A Generic Deep Learning Framework for Automated Vehicle Inspection
Suhi, P. A. P., & Umanandhini, D. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Signal Processing, Computation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT) · doi:10.1109/iconscept66142.2025.11436614
“The introduction of deep learning significantly improved defect detection performance, particularly with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) trained on large annotated datasets [3].”
Efficient and Precise Cheat Detection with Deep Learning
Khabbachi, I., Mdaghri-Alaoui, G., & Zouhair, A. (2025) · International Conference on Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence (ESAI) · doi:10.1109/esai67033.2025.11438402
“Their strength lies in their ability to identify local patterns within multidimensional data, making them exceptionally effective for a broad range of pattern recognition tasks [12].”
Ensemble CNN Approach with Activation Functions Combination for Knee Osteoarthritis Grading
Kishore, V. V., Lakshmi, G. M., Tejaswini, P., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icauc68182.2026.11440933
“[11] – [13].”
Laxmaiah, B., Shilpa, K., Aishwarya, C., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icauc68182.2026.11441221
“To further the cause of usability, a mode-based interaction system is introduced that allows cursor control, command execution, and information retrieval by the assistant to take place smoothly without making the users switch modes and that consequently improves operational efficiency [8].”
InfluentialNeuro-CRISPR-KAN: A Hybrid CNN-Transformer Architecture for Off-Target Prediction in Cystic Fibrosis
Dr.S.Sarumathi, Jeganmurali, B., Kameshwaran, S., & Mr.N.Giridharan (2026) · International Conference on AI-Driven Smart Systems and Ubiquitous Computing (ICAUC) · doi:10.1109/icauc68182.2026.11441032
Learning to follow: An end-to-end deep learning approach for vision-based vessel control
Ding, S., Zheng, M., Hai, N., Chu, X., Lin, B., Zou, T., Zhang, K., Hua, W., & Fu, L. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.125057
Ge, K., & Han, Q.-B. (2026) · Measurement science and technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae567d
Chen, C., Guo, L., Li, S., Sun, J., Pei, L., & Ren, W. (2026) · Science Progress · doi:10.1177/00368504261437172 · Cited by 1
Zheng, J., Li, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., Yang, H., Ma, Q., & Fang, J. (2026) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2026.110938
Leveraging Neurosymbolic AI for Slice Discovery
Collevati, M., Eiter, T., & Higuera, N. (2026) · Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1177/29498732261419315
Adaptive Frame Extraction and Deep CNN-Based Classification of Salt Crystallization Videos
Kolachina, S. K. K., Agada, R., Yan, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/fmlds67896.2025.00014
“Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), in particular, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in learning complex visual features directly from raw data, eliminating the need for manual feature engineering [5].”
(2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80686-799-820261016
Predicting Consumer Behavior in Online Retailing Stores Using Eye-Tracking Data and Deep LearningPreprint
Bergara, M., Cortiñas, M., & Villanueva, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6470925
A Review of Deep Learning-Based Video Analysis Techniques for Quantitative Performance Monitoring
Xu, G., Yu, H., & Li, Q. (2025) · 2025 2nd International Seminar on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Technology and Control Engineering (ACTCE) · doi:10.1109/actce66599.2025.00015
“This attribute proves particularly valuable for performance assessment, where subtle variations in movement quality, efficiency, and biomechanical patterns carry diagnostic significance [4].”
Artificial Intelligence applied to care (I): Origin and general concepts
Grangel, R., Gual, M. V. I., Vidal, A. S., Argudo, J. C. A., & Fernández, Ó. B. (2026) · Enfermería Clínica (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.enfcle.2026.502486
Deep Learning-Based Paddy Crop Disease Detection Using Transfer Learning Approaches
Dharun Mithul, K., V, K, A. A., Mohankumar, N., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1109/iccces62661.2026.11436232
“This shows that the algorithms can each extract some valuable features of the dataset by themselves, but they perform slightly differently as a consequence of their different architectures and learning capacities [Fig 2].”
Hu, R., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Sun, P., Li, Y., & Wu, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6469178
Attentional semantic attack for enhancing adversarial samples transferability
Wang, P., & Liu, J. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45207-8
“This near-neighbor switch indicates that the original class has not been decisively suppressed; such cases often exhibit limited transferability and may fail against other DNNs.”
InfluentialGupta, H., & Yadav, R. (2025) · IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS) · doi:10.1109/agers67633.2025.11446427
“As shown in Table I, the combination of Color-Texture and AlexNet achieved the highest classification accuracy of 96.2% with a standard deviation of 1.9, highlighting its superior performance and reliability compared to other descriptor and CNN architecture combinations.”
InfluentialBasak, C. K., Sarkar, G., & Kundu, P. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6473761
Altun, M., & Turker, M. S. (2026) · Remote Sensing in Earth Systems Sciences · doi:10.1007/s41976-026-00275-2
Failure Detection With Zero-Shot Error Correction in Robotic Manipulation
Luo, H., Bu, X., Wang, H., Guo, S., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2026) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2026.3678124 · Cited by 1
Unnikrishnan, N. K., & Parhi, K. K. (2025) · 2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf67917.2025.11443520
“Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become central to modern machine learning systems [1], powering applications in computer vision [2], language modeling [3], biomedical analysis [4], and large-scale recommendation [5].”
A Spatial-Frequence Semantic-Detail Network for Remote Sensing Object Detection
Fan, Y., Zhang, M., Yu, D., et al. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3678053
Yang, H., Chen, J., Yang, K., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6480002
Jeon, W., Jang, H., Lee, H., Park, C., Lyu, J., & Choi, S. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26072100
“Krizhevsky et al. [27] demonstrated breakthrough performance with AlexNet on large-scale image classification, sparking widespread adoption in medical imaging.”
A Deep Learning Based Approach for the Detection of Landslide in Image Data
Sharma, A., Agarwal, A., Sharma, P., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/elexcom67950.2025.11451311
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Systems
Pandey, S., Shekher, S., Das, S., & Kothari, A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7183-2.ch001
Radharani, S., Sistla, V., & Kolli, V. K. K. (2026) · Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2026.102326 · Cited by 1
An, K., Sun, Y., Wang, A., & Ma, J. (2026) · Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1115/1.4071509
Mishra, B., & Chakraverty, S. (2026) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-026-11348-1
Li, X. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icpege67691.2026.11451455
“Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [1], Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) [2], and Transformer architectures [3] play a pivotal role in representation learning and feature fusion.”
Evaluating and Enhancing YOLOv8’s Soft Error Resilience
Yang, A., Zhi, L., Guan, Y., Tan, T., & Shen, J. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15071404
Priya, H. D., Vimal Kumar, S., Vignesh Prabhu, M., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Communication, IoT and Security (ICISCoIS) · doi:10.1109/iciscois62701.2026.11447516
Short-Term Load Forecasting During Pandemic: The Cambodia Case Study
Sao, S., & Shi, W. (2026) · doi:10.1109/iceaai68945.2026.11442385
“In this regard, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in both two and three dimensions are widely acknowledged as robust networks for handling image processing and classification [20].”
Chen, Z., & Tian, J. (2026) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.70657
“On one hand, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like AlexNet, Inception, MobileNetV2, and ResNet excel at visual feature representation [18–23].”
Artificial intelligence for multiscale drought modeling and decision making
Sarwar, A., Gao, R., Safeeq, M., Abatzoglou, J. T., Medellín‐Azuara, J., & Viers, J. H. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44625-2.00011-4
Diluting restricted Boltzmann machines
Díaz-Faloh, C., & Mulet, R. (2026) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ae4a11
“Over the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have developed rapidly, yielding impressive results in complex tasks such as object recognition [1], language synthesis [2], and protein structure prediction [3].”
AI-Empowered Fusion Machine Learning for Intelligent Program Design: Model and Implementation
Ma, Y., & Yan, P. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icpege67691.2026.11451492
“Compiler work proves that small learned slots can ship in critical paths [13].”
Zhong, J., Chen, J., & Lu, W. (2026) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2026.106921
Dong, P., Hu, C., Tong, G., Wu, Z., & Lei, C. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.aiig.2026.100279
Gol, R. S., Evers, M., Heimes, K., et al. (2026) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.70428
Zhou, C., Li, X., Fu, Y., et al. (2026) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2026.102053
Readout scheme in analog computing-in-memory: Review of design principles and recent progress
Zhang, S., Huang, P., You, H., Wu, X., Chen, W., Zhang, L., & Cui, Q. (2026) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2026.112466
Boonraksa, T., Boonraksa, P., Palachai, K., & Marungsri, B. (2026) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6484664
Real-time economic data analysis for false data embedding detection
Sánchez, O. D., Ibarra, A., Gálvez, J., Munoz-Gomez, G., & Alanís, A. Y. (2026) · Franklin Open · doi:10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100582
Ses ve Görüntü Verileriyle Arı Kovanı Davranışlarını Sınıflandıran Çok Modlu Derin Öğrenme Sistemi
Yıldırım, B., & Durgun, M. (2026) · Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.35234/fumbd.1761928
Efficient Human Facial Emotion Recognition by SNN inspired CNN Features Based model on Video data
Anu Roopa Devi, S., & Nersisson, R. (2026) · International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Cyber-Physical Systems (I5CPS) · doi:10.1109/i5cps67958.2026.11451769
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), one type of deep learning model, have demonstrated impressive performance in extracting features from complicated data, such as pictures and movies [3].”
LungX-Net: A CNN-Based Hybrid System for Multi-Disease Diagnosis in Chest X-Rays
Yuvasri, S., Dayalan, K., & Soren, N. (2026) · International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Cyber-Physical Systems (I5CPS) · doi:10.1109/i5cps67958.2026.11452483
“The modern era of deep learning for image recognition was ushered in by Krizhevsky et al. [1], who demonstrated that deep CNNs could achieve remarkable accuracy on large-scale image classification tasks.”
Automated FHWA Vehicle Classification System via LiDAR and Camera Data Fusion
Arthur, E., Zhang, L., & Adu-Gyamfi, Y. O. (2026) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981261429868
Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures for Cultural Artifact Classification
Sharma, R., & Sahu, P. (2025) · doi:10.1109/emergin67762.2025.11450672
“CNNs first demonstrated their success on a large-scale task on the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) using the AlexNet model and combinations of it, leading to vast improvements in accuracy benchmarks [1].”
Shata, D., Denman, S., Omrani, S., Drogemuller, R., Ali, H., & Wagdy, A. (2026) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings16071369
Kumar, A., & Shukla, M. (2026) · Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40430-026-06308-7
An Efficient and Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Model for Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Uğur, Ç., & Kaya, M. (2026) · Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1620394
Athlete body type recognition based on spectral co-clustering and CNN
Wang, L., & Liu, L. (2026) · International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology · doi:10.1108/ijcst-04-2023-0055
A CNN-Based Framework For Microorganism Classification Using Deep Learning
Kumar, T., Soni, S., & Soni, S. K. (2025) · doi:10.1109/ice367573.2025.11448917
“[11].”
Liang, Z., Sun, R., Li, Z., Zhai, G., & Fang, K. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8414-7_1
Shafeena, S., Kumar, R. S. V., Kumar, S. S., & Shahi, D. (2026) · Informatyka Automatyka Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska · doi:10.35784/iapgos.7427
“CNNs frequently match or exceed human radiologists' performance in cancer identification and segmentation [58].”
Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2026) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-026-06013-z
Long, X., Sun, H., Zhu, Y., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6500532
A Systematic Review of Multi-Object Tracking Using Deep Learning in Video SequencesPreprint
EL-HAWARY, H. M., Sayed, U., El-Zohny, M. A., Mohamed, M. S., Mahmoud, A., & Mahmoud, A. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6500531
MixFP:A Transformer-Based Method for UAV Cross-View Geolocation
Ma, X., Yang, Y. C., Yang, Z., & Zhu, H. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16823-8_11
Al Compute Architecture and Evolution Trends [Feature]
Liang, B.-S. (2026) · IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcas.2025.3650725 · Cited by 3
Deep Learning Models for Detecting AI-Generated Faces: A Comparative Study
Nahes, F., Alharbi, S., Alsuhaimi, S., Aljohani, A., & Yafooz, W. M. S. (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss67859.2026.11454063
“As pioneering models such as AlexNet and VGG showed, deep networks could easily outperform traditional approaches on sophisticated image classification problems [7].”
Mao, X., Liu, P., Chen, L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · doi:10.1080/13467581.2026.2651001
DeepCrypt: A Hybrid Framework for Secure Image using CNN and AES
Chinnasamy, P., Kumar, S., Kumar, G., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icaft66710.2025.11452724
“Recently, approaches powered by deep learning have shown promising results in handling images [5,6,13].”
A Multi-scale Encoder-Decoder Surrogate Model for Dynamic Prediction of Reservoirs
Wang, X., & Wang, J. (2026) · International Conference on Communication Networks and Machine Learning (CNML) · doi:10.1109/cnml68938.2026.11452344
“Their proposal and successful application in the field of computer vision [7] have made CNNs and their variants [8] the mainstream choice for constructing reservoir numerical simulation surrogate models.”
M, S., Vijayalakshmi, M., Thahir Ahamed, T., et al. (2026) · International Conferences on Information Science and System · doi:10.1109/iciss67859.2026.11453739
“On top of attention, robust datasets, along with their image enhancement techniques, are also employed to boost model accuracy [14][15].”
SparseBEV: A Fully Sparse Framework for Multi-View 3D Object Detection
Chen, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, L. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3679808
LW-YOLO: A Lightweight Enhanced YOLOv8-Based Model for Mosquito Detection
Duan, J., Liu, L., Ma, D., et al. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19040267
Cheng, Y.-J. (2025) · International Conferences on Vision, Image and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icvisp68610.2025.11451694
“In contrast, earlier models such as AlexNet [13] and VGG16[14],with their relatively shallow and simpler architectures, struggled to represent the complexity and diversity of the patterns, resulting in significantly lower performance.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
