The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
2 of 14 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces the top-1 and top-5 error rates by 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, as compared with the non overlapping scheme s = 2, z = 2, which produces output of equivalent dimensions.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increases the size of our training set by a factor of 2048”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deep CNNs with ReLUs train several times faster than their equivalents with tanh units.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we still find that the following local normalization scheme aids generalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the 1000 classes of ILSVRC make each training example impose 10 bits of constraint on the mapping from image to label, this turns out to be insufficient to learn so many parameters without considerable overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5. REDUCING OVERFITTING
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“though the resulting training examples are, of course, highly inter dependent.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generally observe during training that models with overlapping pooling find it slightly more difficult to overfit.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a four-layer CNN achieved a 13% test e r r o r r a t e w i t h o u t n o r m a l i z a t i o n a n d 1 1 % w i t h normalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so we used several effective techniques for preventing overfitting”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response normalization reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-GPU net takes slightly less time to train than the one-GPU net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network contains a number of new and unusual features which improve its performance and reduce its training time”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this scheme, our network suffers from substantial overfitting, which would have forced us to use much smaller networks.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, only other types of cat are considered plausible labels for the leopard.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This initialization accelerates the early stages of learning by providing the ReLUs with positive inputs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 6. DETAILS OF LEARNING
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that at the pixel level, the retrieved training images are generally not close in L2 to the query images in the first column.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Training one CNN, with an extra sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer, to classify the entire ImageNet Fall 2011 release (15M images, 22K categories), and then”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our top-1 and top-5 error rates on this dataset are 67.4% and 40.9%, attained by the net described above but with an additional, sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of specialization occurs during every run and is independent of any particular random weight initialization (modulo a renumbering of the GPUs).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magnitude of the effect demonstrated here varies with network architecture, but networks with ReLUs consistently learn several times faster than equivalents with saturating neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 9. EPILOGUE
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network achieves top-1 and top-5 test set error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Averaging the predictions of five similar CNNs gives an error rate of 16.4%.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remainder of this paragraph, we use validation and test error rates interchangeably because in our experience they do not differ by more than 0.1% (see Table 2).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that even off-center objects, such as the mite in the top-left, can be recognized by the net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of our experiments suggest that our results can be improved simply by waiting for faster GPUs and bigger datasets to become available.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ReLUs have the desirable property that they do not require input normalization to prevent them from saturating.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute one such class of models.9,15,17,19,21,26,32”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 4 (1980), 193-202. source
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Krizhevsky, A. Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
- Not checked yetcites [17] 17. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1990).
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the immense complexity of the object recognition task means that this problem cannot be specified even by a dataset as large as ImageNet, so our model should also have lots of prior knowledge to compensate for all the data we do not have.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, compared to standard feedforward neural networks with similarly sized layers, CNNs have much fewer connections and parameters and so they are easier to train, while their theoretically best performance is likely to be only slightly worse.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“methods that require careful hand-engineering by a programmer who understands the domain do not scale as well as methods that replace the programmer with a powerful general-purpose learning procedure.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Luckily, current GPUs, paired with a highly optimized implementation of 2D convolution, are powerful enough to facilitate the training of interestinglylarge CNNs”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they also make strong and mostly correct assumptions about the nature of images (namely, stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel dependencies).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the attractive qualities of CNNs, and despite the relative efficiency of their local architecture, they have still been prohibitively expensive to apply in large scale to highresolution images.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ImageNet, 7 which consists of over 15 million labeled high-resolution images in over 22,000 categories.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] 7. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR09 (2009). source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With enough computation and enough data, learning beats programming for complicated tasks that require the integration of many different, noisy cues.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and recent datasets such as ImageNet contain enough labeled examples to train such models without severe overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for deep neural networks to shine, they needed far more labeled data and hugely more computation.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If at least some training examples produce a positive input to a ReLU, learning will happen in that neuron.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn about thousands of objects from millions of images, we need a model with a large learning capacity.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constants k, n, α, and β are hyperparameters whose values are determined using a validation set”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, on this dataset the primary concern is preventing overfitting, so the effect they are observing is different from the accelerated ability to fit the training set which we report when using ReLUs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since then the best published results are 45.7% and 25.7% with an approach that averages the predictions of two classifiers trained on Fisher Vectors (FVs) computed from two types of densely sampled features.29”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] 29. Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F. High- dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 (2011). IEEE, 1665-1672. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it appears to be too expensive for big neural networks that already take several days to train.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The best published results on this dataset are 78.1% and 60.9%.23”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., Csurka, G. Metric learning for large scale image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. In ECCV -European Conference on Computer Vision (Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability.
“But objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability”
The paper relies on this without support.
Object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of illumination.
“object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of the illumination.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
“Since there is no established test set, our split necessarily differs from the splits used by previous authors, but this does not affect the results appreciably.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krizhevesky et al. [30] first proposed AlexNet and consequently improved the CNN learning ability by increasing its depth and implementing several parameter optimization strategies.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In deep CNN architecture, AlexNet is highly respected [30], as it achieved innovative results in the fields of image recognition and classification.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many CNN models, e.g. AlexNet [30], GoogleNet [103], and ResNet [37], have been trained on large datasets such as ImageNet for image recognition purposes.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To avoid model-specific biases, two different AI models, AlexNet [22] and VGG16 [38], were selected for classification.”
From Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice of this specific size is based on the fact that the AlexNet 34 (and also similar CNN architectures) has been shown to offer satisfactory performances with an input matrix of that size or very similar, albeit for different types of problems with respect to the one presented in this work (e.g., image classification).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Jung et al. [21] found that a reduction in accuracy does not occur when using only four bits for both weight and activation parameters, even for the ImageNet dataset [32].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feature-based approaches [17,18,19] commonly employ networks pre-trained on ImageNet [20] to map original images into a more distinguishable feature space. These methods are typically characterized by low training costs and outstanding performance.”
From An Unsupervised Method for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection with Vision Transformer-Based Autoencoder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Over the past several years, the successes of deep learning on visual tasks has critically relied on convolutional neural networks [20, 16].”
From Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A common perception metric is the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) which uses pre-trained deep neural network backbones such as VGG [9] and AlexNet [22].”
From MTReD: 3D Reconstruction Dataset for Fly-over Videos of Maritime Domain (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with the the success of AlexNet [5] in the ILSVRC challenge [6] in 2012, deep learning models have been outperforming traditional approaches on a number of computer vision problems.”
From Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, it has been acknowledged that the performance of those hashing schemes may degrade significantly if the projected dimensions are imbalanced [4], [6], [13], i.e., their variances vary a lot.”
From Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When convolutional RBMs are stacked together, they form convolutional deep belief networks [22].”
From Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“When a low-capacity model, such as AlexNet, is used for pre-training, little improvement can be obtained when compared to the Resnet50 family [26].”
From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Since its introduction by Krizhevsky et al. [7] in 2012, the CNN model has been successfully applied to a wide range of multimodal applications, such as image dehazing [239, 240] and human activity recognition [241].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The AlexNet architecture was published in [4], achieved significantly improved performance over the other non-deep learning methods for ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2012.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach.”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“Since then, fueled by the revolutionary results of AlexNet [101] and incarnations of patch-based adaptations of Deep Boltzmann Machines and stacked autoencoders, deep learning based segmentation of anatomy and pathology has witnessed a revolution (see also Table II), where for some tasks now we observe human level performance [102].”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“ReLU significantly increases the rate of con-vergence of stochastic gradient descent in comparison with the sigmoid [26].”
From Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Real-time volume estimation has been achieved using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) [11] to produce state-of-the-art performance in a range of medical imaging modalities [12].”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Third convolutional layer exceeds the stated 1% parameter limit
MinorThe third layer alone has 384 × 3 × 3 × 256 = 884,736 kernel weights. That is about 1.47% of the network's stated 60 million parameters, contradicting the claim that every convolutional layer contains no more than 1%.
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 107,001–107,100 of 108,435
Long-time behaviors of dynamics with mean field interactions
Wang, S. (2025) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f864c5ffz4a06z4c7fz8a0az1ab47a4f7535
A Fact-Checking Framework with Denoising Evidence Retrieval and LLM-Based Debate Verification
Yang, J., Bai, Y., Song, D., Wu, Z., & Tian, Y. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792285
Enhanced Electrical Fault Prediction Using Feature Engineering and Image Transform-Based Analysis
Copiaco, A., Hussain, G. A., Afsari, K., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet63943.2025.11471988
Near-field detection for massive MIMO radar: A learning-assisted LRT approach
Ye, S., & He, Q. (2026) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2026.106143
Enhancing surrogate regression methods for structured prediction : An odyssey with loss functions
Junjie, Y. A. N. G. (2025) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8a087025za007z4013zaa7dz6fde23f91948
Mathematical modeling, analysis, and numerical approaches for keloid dynamics
Adebayo, O. E. (2025) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4e8745c4z53c9z4cddz9be1z96855dad626a
Graph Neural Representations of Mammographic Images for Explainable Breast Cancer Detection
Pelluet, G. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3f96a5b0z6ccaz46f9za2efz26ce24b16577
MFCSD: A Cloud Detection Network Based on New Gaofen Satellite Optical Remote Sensing Dataset
Liu, G., Zhang, Y., Tang, H., et al. (2026) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2026.3682632
Differentiable 3D CNN Architecture Searching on ABIDE Brain Image dataset
Liu, J. Y., Shalaginov, M. Y., & Zeng, T. H. (2025) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet63943.2025.11472079
“For example, the AlexNet was the first model to achieve a sub-25% error rate on the ImageNet dataset in 2012 [6], and AlphaGo [7] AI developed by DeepMind beat a world-renowned Go master.”
ADELUWOYE, A. O., Gbadegesin, M. O., James, F. M., Otegbade, P. S., & Alabetutu, A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.04.08.26350456
Maurya, A., Lohia, A., Chirag, Yadav, J., Panjwani, B., & Mohan, V. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47918-4
Big Data Driven Satellite Image Segmentation for Urban Planning and Environmental Analysis
Jagan, S., Madhav, N., & Dastagiramma, K. (2026) · International Conference on Communication, Computing and Emerging Technologies (IC3ET) · doi:10.1109/ic3et64989.2026.11467425
Guo, R., Li, R., Ding, J. J., et al. (2026) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2026.118008
“2D convolutional neural network After AlexNet's big success [52], the challenge of using CNNs for gas recognition has been turning one-dimensional (1D) time responses into two-dimensional (2D) spatial structures.”
Differential impacts of soil hydrothermal properties on root and leaf phenology in cropland
Cao, M., Mohammad, P., Rahman, M. M., & Weng, Q. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2026.105282
DERİN ÖĞRENME İLE AKCİĞER X-RAY GÖRÜNTÜLERİNDEN HASTALIK TESPİTİ
Doymaz, H., & Ertaş, F. (2026) · Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering · doi:10.17482/uumfd.1665390
Wang, P., Yao, Y., Lv, P., Guo, P., & Wang, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6555780
Classification of retinopathy images using augmentation and transfer learning
Kaur, M., Panneerselvam, K., Sohal, A., & Arshiya (2026) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-026-21380-w
Jiang, A., Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Wen, S., Sun, Y., Zhang, P., Han, Q., & Ji, A. (2026) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ae5e33 · Cited by 1
“AI-based Methods include Fuzzy logic [129], Deep learning [130, 131], Reinforcement learning [132], and others.”
Automated Segregation, Quality Prediction, and Disease Detection of Pomegranates Using Deep Learning
Malhotra, M., Kawatra, C., Rajoria, Y. P., Gupta, V., Saggu, A., Mohil, A., & Bajaj, A. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22062-2_9 · Cited by 1
Cross-temporal spatial dependencies in traffic prediction
Song, Y., Zhang, J. I. N., Deng, Z., et al. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11816-z
AdamMAD: Improved Second-Moment of Adam for Enhancing Stability and Convergence
Cheng, W., Wang, B., Li, J., Li, B., & Yang, X. (2026) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-025-00341-7
Cloud Cover retrieval from all-sky images based on Neural NetworksPreprint
Longarela, B., Román, R., Buitrago, F., González-Fernández, D., Gatón, J., del Barrio, C. H., Herrero‐Anta, S., González, R., Mateos, D., Doppler, L., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6560840
Li, X., Yang, L., Chen, M., Han, L., Song, L., Han, F., Liu, R., Chen, S. Z., & Wu, J. (2026) · Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation · doi:10.1029/2025jh000896 · Cited by 1
Arık, K., & Büyükbıçakcı, E. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45694-9
KILIÇ, M., Yıldız, A. M., Barua, P. D., et al. (2026) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107236
Microwave imaging methodologies for breast cancer detection and their progress with deep learning
Ghosh, M., & Basu, B. (2026) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114728
Design and development of a smart system for efficient engineering applications
Malk, N. A. (2026) · International journal of research in science & engineering · doi:10.55529/ijrise.61.1.10
Introducing TH-SE-ResNet for Enhanced Performance for Gender Detection Using Thermal Images
Sonsare, P., Khurana, K., Voditel, P. S., et al. (2026) · New generation computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-026-00322-y
“…Thermal Face dataset [20] and the Charlotte-ThermalFace dataset [19] are used for experimentation, both individually and in combination, to train and evaluate a range of state-of-the-art CNN architectures including AlexNet [21], VGG [22], InceptionV3 [23], ResNet50 [24], and EfficientNet [25].”
Jagathesh, M., & Narayanan, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1751520 · Cited by 1
“Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) are good at image classification (Krizhevsky et al., 2017) they require large dataset and significant computational resources, but they are limited in addressing global contextual information and this issue is addressed by using attention-based architecture such…”
A cross-camera multi-target tracking algorithm for substation scenarios
Yu, H., Liu, Z., Li, X. Q., Shan, X., & Piao, W. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01222-2
“The AlexNet [4] introduced Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN), followed by the Region-CNN (R-CNN) framework [5], marking the deep learning era of target recognition.”
Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Deferred Entanglement Path Selection in Quantum Networks
Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, E., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/ton.2026.3683478
Alkasasbeh, M. S., Ibnaouf, K. H., Ahmed, N. M., Rahman, A. A., Abbas, D. N., Tawil, A. A., Idriss, H., & Alkasasbeh, H. T. (2026) · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/acm2.70560
MvWsT: Muti-View Deep Network with Weakly-Supervised Learning for Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease
Li, Z., Zhang, X., Zhao, X., et al. (2026) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2025.9010103
Silent Speaker's Communicator: a Gesture-to-Text Protocol for Assistive Communication
Kumar, P., Singh, A., Pandey, I., Sharma, A., Kumar, N., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2026) · International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM) · doi:10.1109/iciptm69057.2026.11465600
“Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are often applied to classify these normalized coordinates into certain types of gestures [28].”
Cao, J., Xian, X., Duan, Z., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Agronomy · doi:10.3389/fagro.2026.1765811
Sheidani, A., Girfoglio, M., Quaini, A., et al. (2026) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112683
Duan, Y., Coleman, S., Yang, L., Wang, H., Wang, G., & Kerr, D. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18081140
Hameed, W., Yang, G., Sima, M. W. U., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1785037
Guo, X., Tao, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Electronics · doi:10.23919/cje.2024.00.141
Automated image-based quality classification of basalt stone surfaces in manufacturing
Pham, T.-T., Tran, T., Cap, T., et al. (2026) · Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114779
Low-light facial micro-expression recognition
Li, Z., Wang, Y., Yan, J., & He, H. (2026) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-026-01819-8
Predictive models for the added mass of model ice floes using supervised learning
Seidl, M., Murrant, K., Quinton, B. W. T., et al. (2026) · Cold Regions Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2026.104951
Fang, J., Sun, H., Sun, X., Ni, L., & Gao, L. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2026.3683056
A database and model for the PM2.5 concentration measurement with visible and infrared imaging
Wang, H., Jiang, H., Wang, G., et al. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113754
Yan, S., Gao, J., Wang, Q., et al. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26082429
Yuan, P., Yang, P., & Cui, W. (2026) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2026.102112
Enhancing Image Captioning With SWIN, DETR, and GPT: A Unified Transformer Framework
Sahli, M., & Farah, M. (2025) · IEEE Afro-Mediterranean Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AMCAI) · doi:10.1109/amcai66110.2025.11474360
“While CNNs have been foundational architecture for computer vision tasks for decades, their mainstream success began with the introduction of AlexNet [10], which demonstrated their power on a large scale.”
Machine Learning and Covariance Matrices
Lan, W., & Tsai, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08796-6_9
Alfaz, N., Sarwar, T. B., Farid, F. A., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1751148
MTLQ-ViT: Multi-granularity Tail-enhanced Logarithmic Quantization for Vision Transformers
Kang, Y., Xu, S., Lin, Q., He, K., Gao, Z., Chen, Z., & Pu, B. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113769
Mustapha, B., Zhou, Y.-T., & Nawel, B. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Recent Advances in Mathematics and Informatics (ICRAMI) · doi:10.1109/icrami64946.2025.11472752
“…patterns associated with various pulmonary conditions, including COVID-19, by leveraging hierarchical feature extraction from raw imaging data [4]. signatures, such as ground-glass opacities and consolidation patterns characteristic of COVID-19, which often overlap with features of non-COVID…”
Siyoufi, H., Ismail, K., & Badran, A. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA) · doi:10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11468126
“The first layer uses EfficientNetV2B0 as the feature extractor [57], pre-trained on ImageNet21k dataset [58].”
Video anomaly detection via video restoration based on start-end frames by recalling context
Tian, Y., & Wang, C. (2026) · Pattern Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10044-026-01670-7
Deng, J. D. (2026) · Machine learning · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9689-5_13
RecHCA: Hierarchical Context Awareness for one-step sensorless freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction
Yang, Q.-H., Zhang, J., Chen, C., Liu, X.-Y., Xi, Y., Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhou, G.-Q. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113718
Real-Time Markerless Hand and Object Tracking with Occlusion Awareness for Augmented Reality
Sakhamuru, A., Vasireddy, S., & Maloth, B. (2026) · doi:10.1109/icvadv67766.2026.11470547
“The proposed system is compared against simplified architectures to demonstrate the effectiveness of the occlusion-aware perception and fusion strategy: • CNN-only Tracker [19]: Uses a lightweight CNN backbone for feature extraction without temporal modeling.”
AI-driven discovery of new materials: breaking data bottlenecks and transforming research paradigms
Pengfei, H., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/csb-2026-0182
Kargl, M., Eibensteiner, F., Dalpiaz, C., et al. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA) · doi:10.1109/acdsa67686.2026.11468164
MSRS-MambaUNet: A multi-source remote sensing model for landslide detection
Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Qin, Y., Hu, H., Hu, Y., & Lv, B. (2026) · Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2026.03.020
Alomari, I., Taffese, W. Z., Afsharmovahed, M. H., et al. (2026) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122776
Sun, C., Xu, D., Wang, L., Li, M., Shi, R., Liu, X., Li, B., & Deng, R. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6592822
PVision-SQ: mid-term multimodal fusion for photovoltaic defect detection
Su, L., Du, D., & jiang, J. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae615b
“For the i th detection layer, the input multimodal fusion feature x i ∈ R C i × H i × W i is first transformed through an independent convolutional layer: All detection layers then share the same set of convolutional parameters for deep feature extraction [22]:”
InfluentialUsing Task Graph Caching to Accelerate TVM Code Generation
Camacho, T. A. S., Silva, L. F. A. E., Pereira, M., & Araujo, G. C. S. D. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization · doi:10.1145/3810246
“It includes ResNet18, ResNet50, and ResNet152 [21]; DenseNet121 [23]; AlexNet [26]; VGG16 [35]; MobileNetV2 [47] and MobileNetV3 [22]; GoogLeNet [51]; InceptionV3 [52]; ResNeXt50 [54]; and WideResNet50 [57].”
Zhang, H., ZHANG, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2026) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114824
Mamba for Medical Imaging: Breast Cancer Classification in Ultrasound with State Space Models
Aniq, E., El-Ghanaoui, A. F., Jetti, M., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18857-1_36
ABE-YOLO: A Lightweight and Efficient Model for Maize Ear Detection
Duan, Z., Jin, X.-L., Yu, X., et al. (2026) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2026.102125 · Cited by 1
Reliable Benchmarking of Breast Ultrasound Lesion Classification Requires Patient-Level Validation
Wang, L. (2026) · Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy · doi:10.1115/1.4071712
Feng, Y., & Guo, L. (2026) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2026.110319
Bravo-González, A., Domínguez-Ruiz, P., Buitrago-Gonzalez, M. J., Bach, B., Chen, Z., Suarez, D., Arruda, M. P., Lima, R. V., Valle, G. S. D., Zinher, M. T., et al. (2026) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-026-07230-3 · Cited by 1
“Early CNNs such as AlexNet and VGG16 introduced layered convolutional structures that automatically learn spatial hierarchies of features from raw image pixels [11].”
AI Based Makeup Recommendation System: A Suitable AI Solution for Women
Abbasi, M. A., Khan, A. A., Laeeq, K., et al. (2026) · VAWKUM Transactions on Computer Sciences · doi:10.21015/vtcs.v14i1.2314
Tuning Impact Parameters of the Convolutional Neural Network for Efficient Detection
Pasanajano, P., & Sodsee, S. (2026) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08765-2_19
Digge, A. R., Moon, S. K., & Jaiswal, R. C. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19681-1_19
A generative AI framework for digital twin maintenance in dynamic retail environments
Teixeira, S., & Arrais, R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01221-3
“The standard procedure for object recognition is oftentimes to take a pre-trained model as a basis [1], usually a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [2], and retrain the model using an additional more specific dataset of objects to be detected [3].”
Rivas-Pinto, L., Armas, K. M. G., Barrionuevo, M. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Dental Health and Oral Research · doi:10.46889/jdhor.2026.7132
Classification with Auxiliary Representation Learning for Detecting Breast Cancer
Bhattacharyya, R., Dey, S., Chatterjee, U., & Mitra, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18480-1_28
YOLOv13-PCB-Lite: A Lightweight Model for PCB Defect Detection Based on Improved YOLOv13
Liu, Y., & Jin, X. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3795926.3796007
“The core innovation of Lite-DSC3k2 is its progressive grouped convolution strategy [ 15 ] .”
Ye, B., Zhang, G., Zha, W., Zhang, J., Gao, G., Yang, J., Ye, Q., Hu, S., Garg, L., Dwivedi, A. K., et al. (2026) · Natural Sciences · doi:10.1002/ntls.70065
“SqueezeNet [ 18 ], proposed by For-rest N. Iandola et al., achieved results similar to those of AlexNet [ 13 ] with only 1/50 of the parameters of the AlexNet model.”
Automatic Classification of Chest X-Ray Diseases Based on Vision Transformer
Liang, S., Chen, P., Wu, T., & Dong, Y. (2026) · International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Systems (ISCAIS) · doi:10.1109/iscait69154.2026.11477416
“Wang et al. [1] systematically evaluated models such as AlexNet [2], VGGNet [3], GoogLeNet [4], and ResNet [5] on the ChestX-ray8 dataset, confirming the effectiveness of CNNs for this task.”
Raihan, T., Kim, C. H., Shimono, H., et al. (2026) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70223
“For example, DeepGS, an ensemble of convolutional neural network (CNN) (Krizhevsky et al., 2012) and ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction, has been used to predict genetic values from imputed SNPs (Ma et al., 2018), whereas a simple dense neural network has been utilized for…”
Bai, W. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46424-x · Cited by 1
“The fundamental building block of CNN architectures consists of convolutional layers that perform local feature extraction through learnable filter kernels 23 .”
Lixin, 张. Z., Kai, 霍. H., Zijuan, 刘. L., et al. (2026) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos252123
CDR-Net: A computerized framework to detect Alzheimer’s diseases and mild cognitive impairment
Alvi, A. M., Siuly, S., Cola, M. C. D., & Wang, H. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346576 · Cited by 1
Zhang, J., Tan, J., Tong, X., Wang, H. W., Zhao, Y., Song, J., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2026.1817094 · Cited by 1
MSAT: Multi-Scale Semantic-Aligned Transformer for Multi-Label Image Classification
Lin, X., Chen, Z., Liu, Y., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11463718
Multinomial Feature Matching for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Pitts, C., Estrada, T., & Roman, G.-C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6620122
Inga, G. R. R., Chavez, L. J. P., & Vilcarromero, J. F. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8919524/v1
EBAD-GS: Deblurring Gaussian Splatting with Event-Driven Bundle Adjustment
Deng, Y., Wang, Y., Tang, C., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11464704
Efficient Moiré Artifact Removal in RAW and sRGB Domains via Spiking Neural Networks
Tan, J., Qian, J., & Pei, S. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11460665
Unmasking Emotions: A Robust Facial Recognition Ensemble System
Berindeie, A. (2025) · International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC) · doi:10.1109/synasc69064.2025.00080
“Early CNN-based models like LeNet [12] and AlexNet [13] laid the foundation for modern FER systems, with subsequent architectures like VGG [14] and ResNet [15] achieving state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets like FER2013 [11] and CK + [8] laid the ground for further improvements in…”
PGFed: Prompt-Guided Distillation for Personalized Federated Learning with Model Heterogeneity
Yang, X., Feng, J., Zhong, L., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462014
Snyers, C., Houban, H., Jardon, Z., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6618019
Kim, Y., Kim, H., Kizaki, T., et al. (2026) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2026.04.012
PESH: a parameter-efficient fine-tuning small sample histopathology images training framework
Zhang, D. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae62df
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [6] and Transformer architectures [7] have achieved great success in visual tasks and have been widely applied in medical image analysis.”
Score-USOD: A Generative Approach to Underwater Saliency Detection
Wang, S., Xu, D., & Liu, Y. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11462583
Domain Generalization via Distilling from Domain-Deconfused Clip Features
Zhang, P., Wen, Z., Zhang, M., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11463570
LI, H., Sahrani, S., & Sarker, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6618617
FinHuBERT: Hierarchical Feature Imitating Networks for Low-Resource Speech Recognition
Fatehi, K., Shirian, A., & Loweimi, E. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11464914
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
