Exploring DIY tutorials as a way to disseminate research through design
Abstract
This forum highlights conversations at the intersection of design methods and social studies of technology. By highlighting a diversity of perspectives on design interventions and programs, we aim to forge new connections between HCI design and communication, science and technology studies, and media studies scholarship. --- Daniela Rosner, Editor
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such perceptual aspects in expressive making could increase structural awareness and foster a satisfying internal state.
“Such perceptual aspects in expressive making could increase structural awareness and foster a satisfying internal state [38, 113].”
From "When He Feels Cold, He Goes to the Seahorse"—Blending Generative AI into Multimaterial Storymaking for Family Expressive Arts Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
Cites
Autobiographical design in HCI research
Neustaedter, C., & Sengers, P. (2012) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2317956.2318034 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The logic of annotated portfolios
Bowers, J. (2012) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2317956.2317968 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry
Wakkary, R., Odom, W., Hauser, S., et al. (2015) · Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing · doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Self-citationGaver, W. W. (2011) · ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979169 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Desjardins, A., & Wakkary, R. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858261 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationSharing the hidden treasure in pictorials
Blevis, E., Hauser, S., & Odom, W. (2015) · interactions · doi:10.1145/2755534 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationUnselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct
Wakkary, R., Desjardins, A., & Hauser, S. (2015) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwv018 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, D., Zhou, H., & An, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642852 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Desjardins, A., Wakkary, R., Odom, W., Lin, H., & Schilling, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Emily Carr University of Art and Design (CA)
- Venue
- Interactions
- Published
- 2017-06-23
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 78-82
- ISSN
- 1072-5520 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3449
- OpenAlex
- W2645880303
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- interactions (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
- Keywords
- research dissemination, design interventions, social studies of technology, science and technology studies, media studies, human-computer interaction design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
