Cited by 39Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataMobile and Web Applications

PrivacyStreams: Enabling Transparency in Personal Data Processing for Mobile Apps

Li, Yuanchun, Chen, Fanglin, Li, Toby Jia-Jun, Guo, Yao, Huang, Gang, Fredrikson, Matthew, Agarwal, Yuvraj, Hong, Jason I.·2017·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Smartphone app developers often access and use privacy-sensitive data to create apps with rich and meaningful interactions. However, it can be challenging for auditors and end-users to know what granularity of data is being used and how, thereby hindering assessment of potential risks. Furthermore, developers lack easy ways of offering transparency to users regarding how personal data is processed, even if their intentions are to make their apps more privacy friendly. To address these challenges, we introduce PrivacyStreams, a functional programming model for accessing and processing personal data as a stream. PrivacyStreams is designed to make it easy for developers to make use of personal data while simultaneously making it easier to analyze how that personal data is processed and what granularity of data is actually used. We present the design and implementation of PrivacyStreams, as well as several user studies and experiments to demonstrate its usability, utility, and support for privacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3130941

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As pointed out by existing work in LLMs and natural language processing, there are restrictions to the number of tokens input to the LLMs, limiting the length of conversation history texts that could be included in LLM prompting.

    “As pointed out by existing work in LLMs and natural language processing, there are restrictions to the number of tokens input to the LLMs [6], limiting the length of conversation history texts that could be included in LLM prompting [12,70,116].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Chen, F., Li, T. J.-J., Guo, Y., Huang, G., Fredrikson, M., Agarwal, Y., & Hong, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2017-09-11
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
1-26
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756371034
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61421091)
  • China Scholarship Council (201606010240)
  • National Science Foundation (CSR-1526237, CNS-1564009)
  • Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8750-15-2-0281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
Keywords
privacy-preserving data processing, mobile application, data granularity, privacy transparency, privacy auditing, data access control, user privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review