The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MGAE: Marginalized Graph Autoencoder for Graph Clustering
Abstract
Graph clustering aims to discovercommunity structures in networks, the task being fundamentally challenging mainly because the topology structure and the content of the graphs are difficult to represent for clustering analysis. Recently, graph clustering has moved from traditional shallow methods to deep learning approaches, thanks to the unique feature representation learning capability of deep learning. However, existing deep approaches for graph clustering can only exploit the structure information, while ignoring the content information associated with the nodes in a graph. In this paper, we propose a novel marginalized graph autoencoder (MGAE) algorithm for graph clustering. The key innovation of MGAE is that it advances the autoencoder to the graph domain, so graph representation learning can be carried out not only in a purely unsupervised setting by leveraging structure and content information, it can also be stacked in a deep fashion to learn effective representation. From a technical viewpoint, we propose a marginalized graph convolutional network to corrupt network node content, allowing node content to interact with network features, and marginalizes the corrupted features in a graph autoencoder context to learn graph feature representations. The learned features are fed into the spectral clustering algorithm for graph clustering. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of MGAE, compared to numerous baselines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
DeepWalk: online learning of social representations
Perozzi, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Skiena, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623732 · Cited by 10,123
Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390294 · Cited by 7,436
LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741093 · Cited by 5,416
Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.036104 · Cited by 4,761
Face recognition: a convolutional neural-network approach
Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., Tsoi, A. C., & Back, A. D. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.554195 · Cited by 3,092
Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition
Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2011.2134090 · Cited by 3,011
Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory
Hammond, D. K., Vandergheynst, P., & Gribonval, R. (2011) · Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.acha.2010.04.005 · Cited by 2,171
Cited by
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978386 · Cited by 11,000
Self-citationGraph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880
Network Representation Learning: A Survey
Zhang, D., Yin, J., Zhu, X., & Zhang, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2018.2850013 · Cited by 714
Self-citationWang, T., Shao, W., Huang, Z., Tang, H., Zhang, J., Ding, Z., & Huang, K. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23774-w · Cited by 671
Autoencoders and their applications in machine learning: a survey
Berahmand, K., Daneshfar, F., Salehi, E. S., Li, Y., & Xu, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10662-6 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Pan, S., Long, G., Zhu, X., & Jiang, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-11-06
- Pages
- 889-898
- OpenAlex
- W2767404761
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MGAE: Marginalized Graph Autoencoder for Graph Clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3132847.3132967
- The paper
- Wang, C., Pan, S., Long, G., Zhu, X., & Jiang, J. (2017). MGAE: Marginalized Graph Autoencoder for Graph Clustering. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
