Multimodal Multi-task Learning for Dimensional and Continuous Emotion Recognition
Abstract
Automatic emotion recognition is a challenging task which can make great impact on improving natural human computer interactions. In this paper, we present our effort for the Affect Subtask in the Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge (AVEC) 2017, which requires participants to perform continuous emotion prediction on three affective dimensions: Arousal, Valence and Likability based on the audiovisual signals. We highlight three aspects of our solutions: 1) we explore and fuse different hand-crafted and deep learned features from all available modalities including acoustic, visual, and textual modalities, and we further consider the interlocutor influence for the acoustic features; 2) we compare the effectiveness of non-temporal model SVR and temporal model LSTM-RNN and show that the LSTM-RNN can not only alleviate the feature engineering efforts such as construction of contextual features and feature delay, but also improve the recognition performance significantly; 3) we apply multi-task learning strategy for collaborative prediction of multiple emotion dimensions with shared representations according to the fact that different emotion dimensions are correlated with each other. Our solutions achieve the CCC of 0.675, 0.756 and 0.509 on arousal, valence, and likability respectively on the challenge testing set, which outperforms the baseline system with corresponding CCC of 0.375, 0.466, and 0.246 on arousal, valence, and likability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several challenge-winning studies choose to use both handcrafted and deep features, e.g., by score-level or model-level fusion of separate handcrafted and deep models.
“However, several challenge-winning studies [95], [15], [17], choose to use both handcrafted and deep features, e.g., by scorelevel [95] or model-level [17] fusion of separate handcrafted and deep models.”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
SoundNet, a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning, and was featured in a challenge-winning submission.
“SoundNet [138], a 1D CNN trained with unlabeled video, has been shown to perform well in SER even without fine-tuning [139], and was featured in a challenge-winning submission [17].”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · see citing works
Prediction of asynchronous dimensional emotion ratings from audiovisual and physiological data
Ringeval, F., Eyben, F., Kroupi, E., Yuce, A., Thiran, J.-P., Ebrahimi, T., Lalanne, D., & Schuller, B. (2015) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.11.007 · Cited by 202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ringeval et al. [16] explore two types of multi-task learning for dimension emotion recognition.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments
Rouast, P. V., Adam, M. T. P., & Chiong, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2890471 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Kollias, D. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00259 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
End-to-end multimodal affect recognition in real-world environments
Tzirakis, P., Chen, J., Zafeiriou, S., & Schuller, B. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.011 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sun, L., Lian, Z., Tao, J., Liu, B., & Niu, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 1st International on Multimodal Sentiment Analysis in Real-life Media Challenge and Workshop · doi:10.1145/3423327.3423672 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Semi-supervised Multi-modal Emotion Recognition with Cross-Modal Distribution Matching
Liang, J., Li, R., & Jin, Q. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413579 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal Continuous Emotion Recognition with Data Augmentation Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Huang, J., Li, Y., Tao, J., Lian, Z., Niu, M., & Yang, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop · doi:10.1145/3266302.3266304 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
An Improved Multimodal Dimension Emotion Recognition Based on Different Fusion Methods
Su, H., Liu, B., Tao, J., Dong, Y., Huang, J., Lian, Z., & Song, L. (2020) · 2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP) · doi:10.1109/icsp48669.2020.9321008 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, S., Jin, Q., Zhao, J., & Wang, S.
- Affiliations
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Pages
- 19-26
- OpenAlex
- W2765291577
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15
- FWCI
- 20.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFB1001202)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- emotion recognition, arousal, valence, likeability, multimodal fusion, multi-task learning, shared representations, LSTM-RNN, support vector regression, contextual features, human-computer interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review