CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Teaching and Learning ProgrammingMuseums and Cultural HeritageDesign Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical Making Online: A Study of Children's Maker Websites

Chu, Sharon Lynn, Quek, Francis, Bhangaonkar, Sourabh, Berman, Alexander·2017·Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education
DOI 10.1145/3141798.3141803
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Maker phenomenon revolves around the technology-enabled hands-on production of artifacts, and has been consistently proposed as a vehicle for STEM education and to inculcate a 'Maker mindset' in children. While Making is physical and activities for children typically take place in physical venues like Maker camps and workshops, much information about Making resides online. To understand how virtual online resources may support inherently physical Making activity, we investigate the landscape of Maker websites for children through a perception-based study and a content analysis study. Our findings showed that Maker websites for children are of 3 types: associated with a fixed space, a transient space, or without any physical presence. These provide different support structures for learning and Maker mindset development. Further research is needed to extend the experience of children in Making activities beyond the limitations of physical visits to Makerspaces.1

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3141798.3141803

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chu and colleagues (2017) conducted a content analysis of maker websites for children and found that online venues provide much of the guidance and information that support the physical act of making.

    “For example, in one conference paper, Chu and colleagues (2017) conducted a content analysis of maker websites for children and found that online venues provide much of the guidance and information that support the physical act of making.”

    From Who Is Welcome Here? A Culturally Responsive Content Analysis of Makerspace Websites (2020) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Alexander Curby, 2013, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference
  2. 10.1080/13527260701858497 · DOI
  3. Paulo Blikstein. 2013.Digital Fabrication and 'Making'in Education: The Democratization of Invention. FabLabs: Of Machines Makers and Inventors. 1--21. Paulo Blikstein. 2013.Digital Fabrication and 'Making'in Education: The Democratization of Invention. FabLabs: Of Machines Makers and Inventors. 1--21. · DOI
  4. 10.1145/2485760.2485786 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/1858171.1858206 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/2362364.2362369 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/2181037.2181040 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dougherty Dale, 2012, The Maker Movement is Transforming Business.
  9. Dougherty Dale, 2013, Design
  10. 10.3727/1098305054517327 · DOI
  11. 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Michelle Hlubinka Dale Dougherty Parker Thomas Stephanie Chang and Devon McGuire Makerspace Playbook: School Edition. 2013: Maker Media website. Michelle Hlubinka Dale Dougherty Parker Thomas Stephanie Chang and Devon McGuire Makerspace Playbook: School Edition. 2013: Maker Media website.
  13. Panagiotis Ipeirotis, 2010, NYU: Faculty Digital Archive. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/2451/29585.
  14. 10.1145/1868914.1868950 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.03.001 · DOI
  16. Rob Law Shanshan Qi and Dimitrios Buhalis. 2010.Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism management. 31(3): 297--313. Rob Law Shanshan Qi and Dimitrios Buhalis. 2010.Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism management. 31(3): 297--313. · DOI
  17. Jarkko Moilanen and Tere Vadén. 2013.3D printing community and emerging practices of peer production. First Monday. 18(8). Jarkko Moilanen and Tere Vadén. 2013.3D printing community and emerging practices of peer production. First Monday. 18(8). · DOI
  18. 10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990050 · DOI
  19. Mitchel Resnick and Eric Rosenbaum. 2013.Designing for tinkerability. Design make play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. 163--181. Mitchel Resnick and Eric Rosenbaum. 2013.Designing for tinkerability. Design make play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. 163--181. · DOI
  20. Donald A Schön The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Vol. 5126. 1983: Basic books. Donald A Schön The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Vol. 5126. 1983: Basic books.
  21. Telhan O., Workshop on Digital Fabrication in Education at the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC)
  22. 10.1108/09564230110405280 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., & Berman, A.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-10-21
Pages
1-8
DOI
10.1145/3141798.3141803
OpenAlex
W2771000012
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (FabLearn) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DRL-1433770)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
maker culture, maker mindset, STEM education, makerspaces, virtual learning resources, children's learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review