Cited by 58Innovative Human-Technology InteractionIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingTechnology Use by Older Adults

Co-constructing Family Memory: Understanding the Intergenerational Practices of Passing on Family Stories

Open access
Jones, Jasmine, Ackerman, Mark S.·2018·Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Sharing family stories is an integral aspect of how families remember together and build a sense of connection. Yet, when generations in families are separated by large geographic and temporal distances, the everyday taken-for-granted processes of sharing family stories shift from conversational to mediated forms. To inform HCI research and practice in mediating family stories, we contribute an account of the co-constructive intergenerational social practices enacted to co-construct and interpret family stories. These practices demonstrate the agency of both storytellers and listeners as they work to discover, decipher, and reconstruct family stories. We close by drawing insights from this setting to frame key design challenges for multi-lifespan information systems mediating asynchronous, asymmetric, co-constructive and socially weighted information sharing interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3173574.3173998

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ralph Barthel, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Andrew Hudson-Smith, Angelina Karpovich, Martin Jode, and Chris Speed. 2011. An internet of old things as an augmented memory system. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 2: 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0496-8 · DOI
  2. Maurice Halbwachs. 1992. On Collective Memory. University of Chicago Press.
  3. Brian M Landry. 2009. Storytelling For Digital Photographs: Supporting The Practice, Understanding The Benefit. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, J., & Ackerman, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-04-21
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W2796417895
Cited by
58
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DGE 1256260)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
family memory, family narratives, intergenerational communication, mediated communication, co-construction, asynchronous communication, social practices, information sharing, design challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review