The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Me, My Echo Chamber, and I: Introspection on Social Media Polarization
Open accessAbstract
Homophily - our tendency to surround ourselves with others who share our perspectives and opinions about the world - is both a part of human nature and an organizing principle underpinning many of our digital social networks. However, when it comes to politics or culture, homophily can amplify tribal mindsets and produce "echo chambers" that degrade the quality, safety, and diversity of discourse online. While several studies have empirically proven this point, few have explored how making users aware of the extent and nature of their political echo chambers influences their subsequent beliefs and actions. In this paper, we introduce Social Mirror, a social network visualization tool that enables a sample of Twitter users to explore the politically-active parts of their social network. We use Social Mirror to recruit Twitter users with a prior history of political discourse to a randomized experiment where we evaluate the effects of different treatments on participants' i) beliefs about their network connections, ii) the political diversity of who they choose to follow, and iii) the political alignment of the URLs they choose to share. While we see no effects on average political alignment of shared URLs, we find that recommending accounts of the opposite political ideology to follow reduces participants» beliefs in the political homogeneity of their network connections but still enhances their connection diversity one week after treatment. Conversely, participants who enhance their belief in the political homogeneity of their Twitter connections have less diverse network connections 2-3 weeks after treatment. We explore the implications of these disconnects between beliefs and actions on future efforts to promote healthier exchanges in our digital public spheres.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, combating social media's echo chamber effect through an active exposure to diverse perspectives and networks also represents a viable individual-level strategy for addressing the deepfake problem (Cinelli et al., 2021; Gillani et al., 2018).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Gillani et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery · doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277 · Cited by 2,619
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
LaFollette, H., & Woodruff, M. L. (2013) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.838752 · Cited by 1,402
The law of group polarization.
Sunstein, C. R. (2002) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00148 · Cited by 1,371
Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation
GREEN, D. P. (2024) · doi:10.61700/sgeirzx0v0mjh1252 · Cited by 1,322
Network Diversity and Economic Development
Eagle, N., Macy, M. W., & Claxton, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1186605 · Cited by 778
Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users
Mislove, A. E., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y., Onnela, J.-P. “., & Rosenquist, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14168 · Cited by 761
Political Polarization on Twitter
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126 · Cited by 626 · cited 2×
“ed mention networks — suggesting homophilous endorsement patterns accompanied by a tendency for politically active users to inject partisan content and “call out” their counterparts on the other side [7]. Therefore, even when social media platforms create opportunities for cross-cutting dialog, the dialog is often muc…”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques
Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3305260 · Cited by 514
Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities
Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Mäntymäki, M., Rahman, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113368 · Cited by 209
A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231161880 · Cited by 151
Criss, S., Michaels, E. K., Solomon, K., Allen, A., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-020-00894-5 · Cited by 42
Baines, A. F., Ittefaq, M., & Abwao, M. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9050421 · Cited by 102
Interian, R., G. Marzo, R., Mendoza, I., & Ribeiro, C. C. (2023) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.13224 · Cited by 67
Perifanou, M. A., Tzafilkou, K., & Economides, A. A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11120766 · Cited by 74
Characterizing Online Public Discussions through Patterns of Participant Interactions
Zhang, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sauper, C., & Taylor, S. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274467 · Cited by 48
Ognibene, D., Wilkens, R., Taibi, D., Hernández‐Leo, D., Kruschwitz, U., Donabauer, G., Theophilou, E., Lomonaco, F., Buršić, S., Lobo, R. A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.654930 · Cited by 57
Jeon, Y., Kim, B., Xiong, A., Lee, D., & Han, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479859 · Cited by 45
See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter Bubbles
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Feng, L., Yao, C., Fan, M., Zhang, L., Wang, Q., Geng, X., & Rui, Y. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642545 · Cited by 60
A Survey on Computational Politics
Haq, E.-U., Braud, T., Kwon, Y. D., & Hui, P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3034983 · Cited by 40
de Mesa, J. C., Jacinto, L. G., Peláez, A. L., & Erro‐Garcés, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00230 · Cited by 50
On the impossibility of breaking the echo chamber effect in social media using regulation
Avin, C., Daltrophe, H., & Lotker, Z. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50850-6 · Cited by 44
Yoo, D. W., Birnbaum, M. L., Meter, A. V., Ali, A. F., Arenare, E., Abowd, G. D., & Choudhury, M. D. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/16969 · Cited by 33
de Groot, T., de Haan, M., & van Dijken, M. (2023) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2023.2253730 · Cited by 34
Disinformation detection on social media: An integrated approach
Rastogi, S., & Bansal, D. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13129-y · Cited by 31
Opinion influence maximization problem in online social networks based on group polarization effect
Dai, J., Zhu, J., & Wang, G. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.086 · Cited by 30
Lyons, G. D. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102889 · Cited by 33
Intergroup Contact in the Wild
Zhang, J. S., Tan, C., & Lv, Q. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359295 · Cited by 27
Huang, Z., Silva, A., & Singh, A. K. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498454 · Cited by 27
Modularity and composite diversity affect the collective gathering of information online
Pescetelli, N., Rutherford, A., & Rahwan, I. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23424-1 · Cited by 32
Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes
Efstratiou, A., & Cristofaro, E. D. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555589 · Cited by 33
Evaluating Public Anxiety for Topic-Based Communities in Social Networks
Ta, N., Li, K., Yang, Y., Jiao, F., Tang, Z., & Li, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.2989759 · Cited by 24
Building relationships on social networking sites from a social work approach
de Mesa, J. C., Jacinto, L. G., Peláez, A. L., & García, M. D. L. O. P. (2019) · Journal of Social Work Practice · doi:10.1080/02650533.2019.1608429 · Cited by 13
Community-Based Recommendations on Twitter: Avoiding the Filter Bubble
Grossetti, Q., du Mouza, C., & Travers, N. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34223-4_14 · Cited by 22
Bhuiyan, M. M., Isaza, C. A. B., Mitra, T., & Lee, S. W. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502028 · Cited by 23
Citizen Science on Twitter: Using Data Analytics to Understand Conversations and Networks
Suvodeep Mazumdar, A., & Thakker, D. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi12120210 · Cited by 23
Fringe News Networks: Dynamics of US News Viewership following the 2020 Presidential Election
KhudaBukhsh, A. R., Sarkar, R., Kamlet, M. S., & Mitchell, T. M. (2022) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3501247.3531577 · Cited by 23
Extending the Spiral of Silence: Theorizing a Typology of Political Self-Silencing
Chen, G. M., & Duchovnay, M. (2022) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2022.2129401 · Cited by 21
Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1820225 · Cited by 28
Intercultural Computing Education: Toward Justice Across Difference
Arawjo, I., & Mogos, A. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3458037 · Cited by 24
Werbach, K., Marsden, C. T., Cohen, J. E., Wu, T., Hosanagar, K., Miller, A. P., Mayer-Schönberger, V., Kluttz, D. N., Kohli, N., Mulligan, D. K., et al. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108610018 · Cited by 21
Luo, R., Zhang, T. X. Y., Chen, D. H.-C., Hoorn, J. F., & Huang, I. S. (2022) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics11050092 · Cited by 18
Cheng, Z., Marcos-Marné, H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09864-z · Cited by 18
Proper network randomization is key to assessing social balance
Hao, B., & Kovács, I. A. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj0104 · Cited by 18
Semi-supervised Stance Detection of Tweets Via Distant Network Supervision
Dutta, S., Caur, S., Chakrabarti, S., & Chakraborty, T. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498511 · Cited by 17
Linear Opinion Dynamics Model With Higher Order Interactions
Xu, W., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3324144 · Cited by 19
Representativeness of Abortion Legislation Debate on Twitter: A Case Study in Argentina and Chile
Graells-Garrido, E., Baeza-Yates, R., & Lalmas, M. (2020) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3366424.3383561 · Cited by 19
KHAN: Knowledge-Aware Hierarchical Attention Networks for Accurate Political Stance Prediction
Ko, Y., Ryu, S., Han, S., Jeon, Y., Kim, J., Park, S., Han, K., Tong, H., & Kim, S. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583300 · Cited by 22
An Exploratory Study on Information Cocoon in Recommender Systems
Zhang, L., Lian, Y., Wu, H., Song, C., & Yuan, X. (2025) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-025-00288-9 · Cited by 14
Echo Chambers and Algorithmic Bias: The Homogenization of Online Culture in a Smart Society
Putri, S. D. G., Purnomo, E. P., & Khairunnisa, T. (2024) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202420205001 · Cited by 20
Yang, L., Yang, Z., & Xia, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.994685 · Cited by 17
Castillo-de-Mesa, J., Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero-Muñoz, D., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2021) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.913 · Cited by 13
Castillo de Mesa, J., & Gómez Jacinto, L. (2022) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392120983341 · Cited by 13
Jia, X., Ahn, S., Seelig, M. I., & Morgan, S. E. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12181845 · Cited by 12
The Coevolution of Social Networks and Cognitive Dissonance
Whitaker, R. M., Colombo, G. B., Turner, L. D., Dunham, Y. C., Doyle, D., Roy, E. M., & Giammanco, C. A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3090833 · Cited by 12
Dingler, T., Choudhury, A., & Kostakos, V. (2018) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/3267305.3274189 · Cited by 12
Do Politicians Talk about Politics? Assessing Online Communication Patterns of Brazilian Politicians
Oliveira, L., de Melo, P. O. S. V., Amaral, M. S., & de Pinho, J. A. G. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3412326 · Cited by 11
"We're not all construction workers": Algorithmic Compression of Latinidad on TikTok
Lutz, N., & Aragon, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687019 · Cited by 18
HearHere: Mitigating Echo Chambers in News Consumption through an AI-based Web System
Jeon, Y., Kim, J., Park, S., Ko, Y., Ryu, S., Kim, S., & Han, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637340 · Cited by 11
Health Information-Seeking Behavior of Students at Kuwait University
Aldousari, E., & Al‐Muomen, N. (2020) · The International Information & Library Review · doi:10.1080/10572317.2020.1849913 · Cited by 9
BaitWatcher: A Lightweight Web Interface for the Detection of Incongruent News Headlines
Park, K., Kim, T., Yoon, S., Cha, M., & Jung, K. (2020) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_12 · Cited by 9
Ackermann, K., & Stadelmann‐Steffen, I. (2022) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12498 · Cited by 8
Caste Capital on Twitter: A Formal Network Analysis of Caste Relations among Indian Politicians
Vaghela, P., Mothilal, R. K., Romero, D. M., & Pal, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512927 · Cited by 8
Social Work and Digital Activism: Sorority, Intersectionality, Homophily and Polarisation in #MeToo
de Mesa, J. C., Servós, C. M., Peláez, A. L., & Méndez-Domínguez, P. (2021) · Alternativas Cuadernos de trabajo Social · doi:10.14198/altern2021.28.2.09 · Cited by 8
Using impression data to improve models of online social influence
Liu, R., Greene, K. T., Liu, R., Mandic, M., Valentino, B. A., Vosoughi, S., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96021-3 · Cited by 8
Self-citationVoxPop: An Experimental Social Media Platform for Calibrated (Mis)information Discourse
Sharevski, F., Jachim, P., Pieroni, E., & Jachim, N. (2021) · New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/3498891.3498893 · Cited by 11
Measuring Network Polarization and Political Sectarianism During the 2020 Pandemic
Kamienski, C., Penteado, C. L. D. C., Goya, D., da Rocha, R. V., Mazim, L., di Gênova, D. V. B., Ramos, D. F. S., de França, F. O., Horita, F., & dos Santos, C. D. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3159449 · Cited by 9
de Mesa, J. C., Peláez, A. L., Méndez-Domínguez, P., & Kirwan, G. (2022) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.178.39 · Cited by 7
How social media users adopt the toxic behaviors of ingroup and outgroup accounts
Zoizner, A., & Levy, A. (2025) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmaf018 · Cited by 7
Bridging Thoughts and Words: Graph-Based Intent-Semantic Joint Learning for Fake News Detection
Wang, Z., Sheng, Q., Wang, D., Hu, B., & Cao, J. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761400 · Cited by 6
NewsGuesser: Using Curiosity to Reduce Selective Exposure
Sun, L., Zhang, H., Liu, E., Liu, M., & Vaccaro, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637376 · Cited by 7
Gaur, M., Roy, K., Sharma, A., Srivastava, B., & Sheth, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi52183.2021.00049 · Cited by 7
Effects of Incidental Brief Exposure to News on News Knowledge While Scrolling Through Videos
Takano, M., Ogawa, Y., Taka, F., & Morishita, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3063484 · Cited by 5
The role of social media messages and content creators in shaping COVID-19 vaccination intentions
Jia, X., Ahn, S., & Morgan, S. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1448884 · Cited by 5
Towards a Robust Framework for Multimodal Hate Detection: A Study on Video vs. Image-based Content
Koushik, G. A., Kanojia, D., & Treharne, H. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3701716.3718382 · Cited by 10
Krebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A., & von der Beck, I. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12647 · Cited by 7
Socially Engineering a Polarizing Discourse on Facebook through Malware-Induced Misperception
Sharevski, F., Treebridge, P., Jachim, P., Li, A., Babin, A., & Westbrook, J. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.2009671 · Cited by 5
Echo Chambers within the Russo-Ukrainian War: The Role of Bipartisan Users
Zhang, P., Haq, E.-U., Zhu, Y., Hui, P., & Gareth Tyson, A. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3625007.3627475 · Cited by 5
A Framework for the Unsupervised Modeling and Extraction of Polarization Knowledge from News Media
Paschalides, D., Pallis, G., & Dikaiakos, M. D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3703594 · Cited by 8
Ao, S. H., Mak, A. K. Y., & Tsang, L. (2022) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102227 · Cited by 4
Umemoto, K., Yamamoto, T., & Tanaka, K. (2020) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38825-6_8 · Cited by 4
How violence among consumers alters the expected benefits of participation in a consumer collective
Dessart, L., Covà, B., & Davignon, N. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12594 · Cited by 3
Early morning hour and evening usage habits increase misinformation-spread
Stockinger, E., Gallotti, R., & Hausladen, C. I. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-69447-8 · Cited by 5
Investigating Echo-Chambers in Decentralized Social Networks: A Mastodon Case Study
Huitema, I. R., Oskooei, A. R., Aktaş, M. S., & Riveni, M. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82431-9_26 · Cited by 3
Makama, F. T., James, S. A., & Makama, E. F. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2518437 · Cited by 5
Social Influence Leads to the Formation of Diverse Local Trends
Epstein, Z., Groh, M., Dubey, A., & Pentland, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479553 · Cited by 6
Influence and performance of user similarity metrics in followee prediction
Tommasel, A., & Godoy, D. L. (2020) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551520975359 · Cited by 3
Superdiversity: New paths for social sciences in the upcoming future
Peláez, A. L., Álvarez-Pérez, P., & Harris, V. W. (2021) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/00113921211021934 · Cited by 3
Wheatley, A., Floss, M., Bakola, M., Kampouraki, M., Silveira, B. N., & Scott‐Jones, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.595255 · Cited by 2
Arkhipova, D. (2024) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47001-1_11 · Cited by 2
Twitter polarity and computational propaganda: the case of the Woman, Life, Freedom movement in Iran
Rahbari, M. M., Blanchard, P., & Safari, H. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2025.2537270 · Cited by 3
Breaking the Loop: Causal Learning to Mitigate Echo Chambers in Social Networks
Yu, D., Li, Q., Huo, H., & Xu, G. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3757738 · Cited by 2
Polarisation: the new 'superword'. Meanings and current uses in English and Spanish
Requejo, M. D. P., & Romano, M. (2025) · Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies · doi:10.18573/jcads.137 · Cited by 2
Linking the Dynamics of User Stance to the Structure of Online Discussions
Largeron, C., Mardale, A., & Rizoiu, M.-A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74251-5_22 · Cited by 2
Lomonaco, F., Taibi, D., Trianni, V., Buršić, S., Donabauer, G., & Ognibene, D. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_26 · Cited by 4
Zumofen, G. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2221681 · Cited by 2
Parti, K., Dearden, T. E., & E.Hawdon, J. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003429678-7 · Cited by 1
Markus, A., Baumann, M., Pfister, J., Andreas Hotho, A., Carolus, A., & Wienrich, C. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00522-6 · Cited by 3
Pimentel, A. P., da Motta, C. L. R., Correia, A., de Souza, J. M., & Schneider, D. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033464 · Cited by 1
A Novel Framework for Evaluating Polarization in Online Social Networks
Buratti, C., Marchetti, M., Parlapiano, F., Ursino, D., & Virgili, L. (2025) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc9090227 · Cited by 1
You, J., Hong, S.-K., Liu, L., Lee, K., & Kwon, H.-Y. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761361 · Cited by 3
Malick, R. A. S., Murtaza, M., & Qureshi, K. A. (2022) · International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS) · doi:10.1109/iccws56285.2022.9998467 · Cited by 1
How article category in Wikipedia determines the heterogeneity of its editors
Oeberst, A., & Ridderbecks, T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50448-y · Cited by 1
Positive Communities on Signed Graphs That Are Not Echo Chambers: A Clique-Based Approach
Zhou, A., Wang, Y., Chen, L., & ÖZSU, M. T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00199 · Cited by 1
A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective
Fu, W., Zhu, R., Liu, S., Lu, X. B., & Li, B. (2025) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 · Cited by 2
Lobbé, Q. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a5d74b3cz1af2z464bz90c0ze29ba9430b83 · Cited by 1
Concluding Remarks and Challenges
Tagarelli, A., & Interdonato, R. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00229-9_9
DE-POLARIZING BY COLORING, REASONING BY CURATING
Goldberg, T., Wecker, A. J., Tabashi, T., & Reinhartz-Berger, J. L. A. I. (2022) · IADIS International Conference on e-Society (ES) · doi:10.33965/es_ml2022_202202c042
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillani, N., Yuan, A., Saveski, M., Vosoughi, S., & Roy, D.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 823-831
- OpenAlex
- W4300918441
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 38.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- echo chambers, political homophily, social network visualization, Twitter, political polarization, network diversity, social mirror, online political discourse, public sphere
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review