The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection
Abstract
Affect recognition aims to detect a person's affective state based on observables, with the goal to e.g. improve human-computer interaction. Long-term stress is known to have severe implications on wellbeing, which call for continuous and automated stress monitoring systems. However, the affective computing community lacks commonly used standard datasets for wearable stress detection which a) provide multimodal high-quality data, and b) include multiple affective states. Therefore, we introduce WESAD, a new publicly available dataset for wearable stress and affect detection. This multimodal dataset features physiological and motion data, recorded from both a wrist- and a chest-worn device, of 15 subjects during a lab study. The following sensor modalities are included: blood volume pulse, electrocardiogram, electrodermal activity, electromyogram, respiration, body temperature, and three-axis acceleration. Moreover, the dataset bridges the gap between previous lab studies on stress and emotions, by containing three different affective states (neutral, stress, amusement). In addition, self-reports of the subjects, which were obtained using several established questionnaires, are contained in the dataset. Furthermore, a benchmark is created on the dataset, using well-known features and standard machine learning methods. Considering the three-class classification problem ( baseline vs. stress vs. amusement ), we achieved classification accuracies of up to 80%,. In the binary case ( stress vs. non-stress ), accuracies of up to 93%, were reached. Finally, we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the two device locations ( chest vs. wrist ) as well as the different sensor modalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use
Malik, M., Bigger, J. T., Camm, A. J., Kleiger, R. E., Malliani, A., Moss, A. J., & Schwartz, P. J. (1996) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868 · Cited by 15,289
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.-M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (2008) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000119004 · Cited by 6,093
Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review
Kreibig, S. D. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010 · Cited by 3,188 · cited 2×
“This window size was chosen following Kreibig et al. [13].”
MethodThe Concepts of Stress and Stress System Disorders: Overview of Physical and Behavioral Homeostasis
Chrousos, G. P. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480090092034 · Cited by 2,689
Detecting Stress During Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors
Healey, J. A., & Picard, R. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2005.848368 · Cited by 2,207
Introducing a New Benchmarked Dataset for Activity Monitoring
Reiss, A., & Stricker, D. (2012) · 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1109/iswc.2012.13 · Cited by 1,456 · cited 1×
“The ACC-features were computed with a window size of five seconds, as similar window lengths are broadly applied for acceleration-based context recognition (e.g. Reiss et al. [21]).”
MethodSelf-citationRussell, J. A. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.345 · Cited by 857
Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention
Mirsamadi, S., Barsoum, E., & Zhang, C. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952552 · Cited by 770
End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networks
Tzirakis, P., Trigeorgis, G., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08619 · Cited by 752
Cited by
Bota, P. J., Wang, C., Fred, A. L. N., & Placido Da Silva, H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2944001 · Cited by 322
Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring
Charlton, P. H., Kyriacou, P. A., Mant, J., Marozas, V., Chowienczyk, P., & Alastruey, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3149785 · Cited by 250
Federated learning for secure IoMT-applications in smart healthcare systems: A comprehensive review
Rani, S., Kataria, A., Kumar, S., & Tiwari, P. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110658 · Cited by 228
Prayitno, Shyu, C.-R., Putra, K. T., Chen, H.-C., Tsai, Y.-Y., Hossain, K. S. M. T., Jiang, W., & Shae, Z.-Y. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112311191 · Cited by 210
“[20,45] WESAD (Wearable Stress and Affect Detection) [75] The WESAD is a dataset for wearable effect and stress detection.”
A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Multi-Modal Fusion: Methods, Technologies and Applications
Jiao, T., Guo, C., Feng, X., Chen, Y., & Song, J. (2024) · Computers, Materials & Continua · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.053204 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Duerichen, R., Marberger, C., & Van Laerhoven, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Pages
- 400-408
- OpenAlex
- W2894771803
- Cited by
- 1,277
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 61.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3242969.3242985
- The paper
- Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Duerichen, R., Marberger, C., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2018). Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.