Towards a Blockchain based Fall Prediction Model for Aged Care
Abstract
Falls are one of the major health concerns for the elderly people. These falls often result in severe injuries which lead into huge medical expenses. Over the recent years, many ICT based fall detection and fall prevention solutions emerged to address the risk factors associated with falls. However, despite of these research studies, predicting the likelihood of falls still remains as a huge challenge in both medical and IT research domains. Data related to these risk factors being scattered among different healthcare providers can be attributed as a main reason for this challenge. This is further amplified by healthcare providers being reluctant to disseminate the data beyond their entities due to the security and privacy concerns. However, in recent years, blockchain has been proven as a promising technology to address the security and privacy challenges in healthcare data exchange as it provides a shared, immutable, and transparent audit trail for accessing data. Therefore, in this paper, we are going to propose a conceptual blockchain based fall prediction model leveraging smart contracts and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) standard to identify the elderly people who are at a higher risk of falling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications
Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292361 · Cited by 711 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In order to address the issues in secure transmission of personal healthcare data generated through mobile and wearable devices, Liang et al. [44] introduced a blockchain based patient centric data sharing mechanism .”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Mäntymäki, M. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103290 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100159 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Blockchain technologies to address smart city and society challenges
Mora, H., Mendoza-Tello, J. C., Varela-Guzmán, E. G., & Szymanski, J. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106854 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rupasinghe, T., Burstein, F., Rudolph, C., & Strange, S.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Health Metrics Pty Ltd, Australia
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-01-29
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W2909502440
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Monash University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
- Keywords
- fall risk prediction, fall risk, older adults, elderly care, blockchain, smart contracts, FHIR, health data interoperability, data privacy, data security, fall prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review