The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrusion Detection Using Big Data and Deep Learning Techniques
Abstract
In this paper, Big Data and Deep Learning Techniques are integrated to improve the performance of intrusion detection systems. Three classifiers are used to classify network traffic datasets, and these are Deep Feed-Forward Neural Network (DNN) and two ensemble techniques, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT). To select the most relevant attributes from the datasets, we use a homogeneity metric to evaluate features. Two recently published datasets UNSW NB15 and CICIDS2017 are used to evaluate the proposed method. 5-fold cross validation is used in this work to evaluate the machine learning models. We implemented the method using the distributed computing environment Apache Spark, integrated with Keras Deep Learning Library to implement the deep learning technique while the ensemble techniques are implemented using Apache Spark Machine Learning Library. The results show a high accuracy with DNN for binary and multiclass classification on UNSW NB15 dataset with accuracies at 99.16% for binary classification and 97.01% for multiclass classification. While GBT classifier achieved the best accuracy for binary classification with the CICIDS2017 dataset at 99.99%, for multiclass classification DNN has the highest accuracy with 99.56%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 2×
“B-Profile system [18] is used for the abstract behavior of human interactions and to generate benign natural background traffic and CICFlowMeter [24] is used to extract the features from the dataset.”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
CNN-Based Network Intrusion Detection against Denial-of-Service Attacks
Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, H., Shim, M., & Choi, E. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9060916 · Cited by 420
Design and Development of RNN Anomaly Detection Model for IoT Networks
Ullah, I., & Mahmoud, Q. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3176317 · Cited by 270
Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network Based Intrusion Detection System
Sungkyunkwan University, S. A. 1., Pham, V., Seo, E., & Chung, T.-M. (2020) · Journal of Communications · doi:10.12720/jcm.15.11.808-817 · Cited by 27
Decision Tree-Based Rule Derivation for Intrusion Detection in Safety-Critical Automotive Systems
Buschlinger, L., Rieke, R., Sarda, S., & Kraus, C. (2022) · 2022 30th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing (PDP) · doi:10.1109/pdp55904.2022.00046 · Cited by 14
AI-based Security for the Smart Networks
Kalinin, M., & Zegzhda, P. (2020) · 13th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks · doi:10.1145/3433174.3433593 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Faker, O., & Dogdu, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-04-18
- Pages
- 86-93
- OpenAlex
- W2944643572
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrusion Detection Using Big Data and Deep Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3299815.3314439
- The paper
- Faker, O., & Dogdu, E. (2019). Intrusion Detection Using Big Data and Deep Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299815.3314439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.