The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Aging on Small Target Selection with Touch Input
Abstract
Age-related declines in physical and cognitive function can result in target selection difficulties that hinder device operation. Previous studies have detailed the different types of target selection errors encountered, as well as how they vary with age and with input device for mouse and pen interaction. We extend this work to describe the types of age-related selection errors encountered with small touchscreen devices. Consistent with prior results, we found that older adults had longer target selection times, generated higher error rates, and encountered a broader range of selection difficulties (e.g., miss errors and slip errors) relative to a younger comparison group. However, in contrast to the patterns previously found with pen interaction, we found that miss error (i.e., both landing and lifting outside the target bounds) was a more common source of errors for older adults than slip error (i.e., landing on the target but slipping outside the target bounds before lifting). Moreover, aging influenced both miss and slip errors in our study of touch interaction, whereas for pen interaction, age has been found to influence only slip errors. These differences highlight the need to consider pen and touch interaction separately despite both being forms of direct input. Based on our findings, we discuss possible approaches for improving the accessibility of touch interaction for older adults.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence further confirms superior performance outcomes with touch input among elderly populations (Sultana and Moffatt, 2019).”
From The impact of usage experience and input modality on trust experience and cognitive load in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as Sultana and Moffatt, 2019
Citations
Cites
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262 · Cited by 6,278
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,120
A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary
Levin, H. S. (1993) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005 · Cited by 4,766
Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction
MacKenzie, I. S. (1992) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 · Cited by 1,637
The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area
Grossman, T., & Balakrishnan, R. (2005) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055012 · Cited by 604
Shift: a technique for operating pen- based interfaces using touch
Vogel, D., & Baudisch, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240727 · Cited by 486
Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices
MacKenzie, I. S., Kauppinen, T., & Silfverberg, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/365024.365028 · Cited by 448
Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens
Benko, H., Wilson, A. D., & Baudisch, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1124772.1124963 · Cited by 381
Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons
Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., & Hudson, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258724 · Cited by 376
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.235 · DOI
- 10.5555/1327552.1327929 · doi:10.5555/1327552.1327929
- K. W. Schaie . 2004. Cognitive aging . In Technology for Adaptive Aging, R. W. Pew and S. B. V. Hemel (Eds) . National Academies Press , Washington, DC , 43--63. K. W. Schaie. 2004. Cognitive aging. In Technology for Adaptive Aging, R. W. Pew and S. B. V. Hemel (Eds). National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 43--63.
Cited by
Huang, H., & Hou, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1659594 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Sultana, A., & Moffatt, K.
- Affiliations
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
- Published
- 2019-02-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 1936-7228
- 1936-7236
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 56
- Language
- en
- Funders
- AGE-WELL Networks of Centres of Excellence, Canada (AW CRP 2015- WP4.3)
- Fonds de Recherche du Quebec?Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)?Bourses de doctorat en recherché (2013-NC-164701)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/418290-2012)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.