Cited by 45Teaching and Learning ProgrammingOnline Learning and AnalyticsProblem and Project Based Learning

Behaviors of Higher and Lower Performing Students in CS1

Open access
Liao, Soohyun Nam, Valstar, Sander, Thai, Kevin, Alvarado, Christine, Zingaro, Daniel, Griswold, William G., Porter, Leo·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Abstract

Although recent work in computing has discovered multiple techniques to identify low-performing students in a course, it is unclear what factors contribute to those students' difficulties. If we were able to better understand the characteristics of such students, we may be better able to help those students. This work examines the characteristics of low- and high-performing students through interviews with students from an introductory computing class. We identify a number of relevant areas of student behavior including how they approach their exam studies, how they approach completing programming assignments, whether they sought help after identifying misunderstandings, how and from whom they sought help, and how they reflected on assignments after submitting them. Particular behaviors within each area are coded and differences between groups of students are identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3304221.3319740

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic procrastination negatively impacts students' academic performance, well-being, and learning abilities.

    “This issue negatively impacts students' academic performance, well-being, and learning abilities [25,26,34,39].”

    From ClearMind Workshop: An ACT-based Intervention Tailored for Academic Procrastination among Computing Students (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 5.2 reports that procrastination can amplify poor study practices, cites prior literature linking it to lower programming-assignment grades, and describes a student who could not get help understanding concepts after starting late. Section 4.2.1 also notes that some high-performing students started late and completed their assignments successfully. The paper does not establish an effect on well-being or a general reduction in learning abilities; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Procrastination exacerbates lower-performing computing students' learning as they cannot secure enough time to ask for help.

    “Some prior research on computing students also mentioned procrastination exacerbates lower-performing students' learning as they cannot secure enough time to ask for help [25,26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Fourth Edition. Sage Publications, Inc, 2017.
  2. L. Murphy, G. Lewandowski, R. McCauley, B. Simon, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Debugging: The good, the bad, and the quirky -a qualitative analysis of novices' strategies. In Proceedings of the 39th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 163-167, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, S. N., Valstar, S., Thai, K., Alvarado, C., Zingaro, D., Griswold, W. G., & Porter, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-07-02
Pages
196-202
OpenAlex
W2963800060
Cited by
44
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
FWCI
7.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1712508)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
introductory computing, CS1, student performance, underachieving students, student behavior, programming exercises, help-seeking, student characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review