The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MVAE: Multimodal Variational Autoencoder for Fake News Detection
Open accessAbstract
In recent times, fake news and misinformation have had a disruptive and adverse impact on our lives. Given the prominence of microblogging networks as a source of news for most individuals, fake news now spreads at a faster pace and has a more profound impact than ever before. This makes detection of fake news an extremely important challenge. Fake news articles, just like genuine news articles, leverage multimedia content to manipulate user opinions but spread misinformation. A shortcoming of the current approaches for the detection of fake news is their inability to learn a shared representation of multimodal (textual + visual) information. We propose an end-to-end network, Multimodal Variational Autoencoder (MVAE), which uses a bimodal variational autoencoder coupled with a binary classifier for the task of fake news detection. The model consists of three main components, an encoder, a decoder and a fake news detector module. The variational autoencoder is capable of learning probabilistic latent variable models by optimizing a bound on the marginal likelihood of the observed data. The fake news detector then utilizes the multimodal representations obtained from the bimodal variational autoencoder to classify posts as fake or not. We conduct extensive experiments on two standard fake news datasets collected from popular microblogging websites: Weibo and Twitter. The experimental results show that across the two datasets, on average our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods by margins as large as ~ 6% in accuracy and ~ 5% in F1 scores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Show and tell: A neural image caption generator
Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., & Erhan, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935 · Cited by 6,318
Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902
VQA: Visual Question Answering
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.279 · Cited by 4,487
On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3137597.3137600 · Cited by 3,304
Information credibility on twitter
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500 · Cited by 2,593
Cited by
Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview
Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3002101 · Cited by 979
A survey on deep learning for multimodal data fusion
Gao, J., Li, P., Chen, Z., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01273 · Cited by 821
Zhao, F., Zhang, C., & Geng, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649447 · Cited by 480
Detecting fake news by exploring the consistency of multimodal data
Xue, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Wei, L. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102610 · Cited by 298
A Comprehensive Review on Fake News Detection With Deep Learning
Mridha, M. F., Keya, A. J., Hamid, M. A., Monowar, M. M., & Rahman, M. S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3129329 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Khattar, D., Goud, J. S., Gupta, M., & Varma, V.
- Venue
- The World Wide Web Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-05-13
- Pages
- 2915-2921
- OpenAlex
- W2912305564
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 164.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MVAE: Multimodal Variational Autoencoder for Fake News Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3308558.3313552
- The paper
- Khattar, D., Goud, J. S., Gupta, M., & Varma, V. (2019). MVAE: Multimodal Variational Autoencoder for Fake News Detection. The World Wide Web Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.