Cited by 341Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

"I Hear You, I Feel You": Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a Chatbot

Lee, Yi-Chieh, Yamashita, Naomi, Huang, Yun, Fu, Wai·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Chatbots have great potential to serve as a low-cost, effective tool to support people's self-disclosure. Prior work has shown that reciprocity occurs in human-machine dialog; however, whether reciprocity can be leveraged to promote and sustain deep self-disclosure over time has not been systematically studied. In this work, we design, implement and evaluate a chatbot that has self-disclosure features when it performs small talk with people. We ran a study with 47 participants and divided them into three groups to use different chatting styles of the chatbot for three weeks. We found that chatbot self-disclosure had a reciprocal effect on promoting deeper participant self-disclosure that lasted over the study period, in which the other chat styles without self-disclosure features failed to deliver. Chatbot self-disclosure also had a positive effect on improving participants' perceived intimacy and enjoyment over the study period. Finally, we reflect on the design implications of chatbots where deep self-disclosure is needed over time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3313831.3376175

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Timothy Bickmore and Justine Cassell. 1999. Small talk and conversational storytelling in embodied conversational interface agents. In AAAI fall symposium on narrative intelligence. 87--92.
  2. Timothy Bickmore and Amanda Gruber. 2010. Relational agents in clinical psychiatry. Harvard review of psychiatry 18, 2 (2010), 119--130.
  3. Patrick Corrigan. 2004. How stigma interferes with mental health care. American psychologist 59, 7 (2004), 614.
  4. Paul C Cozby. 1973. Self-disclosure: a literature review. Psychological bulletin 79, 2 (1973), 73.
  5. David DeVault, Ron Artstein, Grace Benn, Teresa Dey, Ed Fast, Alesia Gainer, Kallirroi Georgila, Jon Gratch, Arno Hartholt, Margaux Lhommet, and others. 2014. SimSensei Kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1061--1068.
  6. Gavin Doherty, David Coyle, and Mark Matthews. 2010. Design and evaluation guidelines for mental health technologies. Interacting with computers 22, 4 (2010), 243--252.
  7. Charles T Hill and Donald E Stull. 1987. Gender and self-disclosure. In Self-Disclosure. Springer, 81--100.
  8. Hsin-Yi Huang. 2016. Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in human behavior 57 (2016), 122--132.
  9. Hamutal Kreiner and Yossi Levi-Belz. 2019. Self-Disclosure Here and Now: Combining Retrospective Perceived Assessment With Dynamic Behavioral Measures. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019).
  10. Kira Kretzschmar, Holly Tyroll, Gabriela Pavarini, Arianna Manzini, Ilina Singh, and NeurOx Young People's Advisory Group. 2019. Can your phone be your therapist? Young people's ethical perspectives on the use of fully automated conversational agents (Chatbots) in mental health support. Biomedical informatics insights 11 (2019), 1178222619829083.
  11. James W Pennebaker. 1995. Emotion, disclosure, & health. American Psychological Association.
  12. Kathryn Robertson and others. 2005. Active listening: more than just paying attention. Australian family physician 34, 12 (2005), 1053.
  13. Hans Van der Heijden. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & management 40, 6 (2003), 541--549.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 341

Metadata

Authors
Lee, Y.-C., Yamashita, N., Huang, Y., & Fu, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • NTT (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-21
Pages
1-12
OpenAlex
W3029922759
Cited by
339
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 6
FWCI
49.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Scientific Research (A) 17H00771)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
chatbots, self-disclosure, reciprocity, human-computer dialogue, small talk, intimacy, enjoyment, chatbot design, long-term interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review