Cited by 81Innovative Human-Technology InteractionMental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health Interventions

Exploring the Effects of Technological Writing Assistance for Support Providers in Online Mental Health Community

Open access
Peng, Zhenhui, Guo, Qingyu, Tsang, Ka Wing, Ma, Xiaojuan·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Textual comments from peers with informational and emotional support are beneficial to members of online mental health communities (OMHCs). However, many comments are not of high quality in reality. Writing support technologies that assess (AS) the text or recommend (RE) writing examples on the fly could potentially help support providers to improve the quality of their comments. However, how providers perceive and work with such technologies are under-investigated. In this paper, we present a technological prototype MepsBot which offers providers in-situ writing assistance in either AS or RE mode. Results of a mixed-design study with 30 participants show that both types of MepsBots improve users' confidence in and satisfaction with their comments. The AS-mode MepsBot encourages users to refine expressions and is deemed easier to use, while the RE-mode one stimulates more support-related content re-editions. We report concerns on MepsBot and propose design considerations for writing support technologies in OMHCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3313831.3376695

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 81

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N. Bennett, Kori Inkpen, Jaime Teevan, Ruth Kikin-Gil, and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 6, Article 31 (Dec. 2018), 29 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3241044 · DOI
  3. Gerhard Andersson and Nickolai Titov. 2014. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 13 (02 2014), 4-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wps.20083 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Paul André, m.c. schraefel, Jaime Teevan, and Susan T. Dumais. 2009. Discovery is Never by Chance: Designing for (Un)Serendipity. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305-314. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640279 · DOI
  5. Jaime Arguello, Brian S. Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, Robert Kraut, Kimberly S. Ling, Carolyn Rosé, and Xiaoqing Wang. 2006. Talk to Me: Foundations for Successful Individual-group Interactions in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 959-968. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124916 · DOI
  6. Shrey Bagroy, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. A Social Media Based Index of Mental Well-Being in College Campuses. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1634-1646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025909 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Piet Bracke, Wendy Christiaens, and Mieke Verhaeghe. 2008. Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, and the Balance of Peer Support Among Persons With Chronic Mental Health Problems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38, 2 (2008), 436-459. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00312.x · DOI
  8. Stevie Chancellor, Andrea Hu, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018. Norms Matter: Contrasting Social Support Around Behavior Change in Online Weight Loss Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 666, 14 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174240 · DOI
  9. Stevie Chancellor, Yannis Kalantidis, Jessica A. Pater, Munmun De Choudhury, and David A. Shamma. 2017. Multimodal Classification of Moderated Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3213-3226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025985 · DOI
  10. Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan (Jerry) Lin, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016a. "This Post Will Just Get Taken Down": Characterizing Removed Pro-Eating Disorder Social Media Content. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1157-1162. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858248 · DOI
  11. Stevie Chancellor, Tanushree Mitra, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016b. Recovery Amid Pro-Anorexia: Analysis of Recovery in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2111-2123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858246 · DOI
  12. Stevie Chancellor, George Nitzburg, Andrea Hu, Francisco Zampieri, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019. Discovering Alternative Treatments for Opioid Use Recovery Using Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 124, 15 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300354 · DOI
  13. Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. #Thyghgapp: Instagram Content Moderation and Lexical Variation in Pro-Eating Disorder Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1201-1213. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819963 · DOI
  14. Pamara Chang, Janis Whitlock, and Natalya Bazarova. 2018. "To Respond or not to Respond, that is the Question": The Decision-Making Process of Providing Social Support to Distressed Posters on Facebook. Social Media + Society 4 (02 2018), 205630511875929. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305118759290 · DOI
  15. Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 329-340. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172983 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, Eric J. Horvitz, and Aaron Hoff. 2014. Characterizing and Predicting Postpartum Depression from Shared Facebook Data. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 626-638. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531675 · DOI
  17. Keith S. Dobson. 2010. Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies, 3rd ed. Guilford Press, New York, NY, US. xiv, 481-xiv, 481 pages.
  18. Noura Farra, Swapna Somasundaran, and Jill Burstein. 2015. Scoring Persuasive Essays Using Opinions and their Targets. In Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, Colorado, 64-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-0608 · DOI
  19. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Everyday Experiences: Small Stories and Mental Illness on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 265, 14 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300495 · DOI
  20. Xinning Gui, Yu Chen, Yubo Kou, Katie Pine, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Investigating Support Seeking from Peers for Pregnancy in Online Health Communities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 50 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3134685 · DOI
  21. Thomas K. Houston, Lisa A Cooper, and Daniel Ernest Ford. 2002. Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. The American journal of psychiatry 159 12 (2002), 2062-8.
  22. Julie S. Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Introductory Help Requests. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173596 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lisa J Barney, Kathleen Griffiths, and Michelle Banfield. 2011. Explicit and implicit information needs of people with depression: A qualitative investigation of problems reported on an online depression support forum. BMC psychiatry 11 (05 2011), 88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-88 · DOI
  24. Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, and Leon Watts. 2018. 'It's More Like a Letter': An Exploration of Mediated Conversational Effort in Message Builder. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 87 (Nov. 2018), 23 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3274356 · DOI
  25. Jan Kietzmann, Kristopher Hermkens, Ian McCarthy, and Bruno Silvestre. 2011. Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business Horizons 54 (05 2011), 241-251. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Taewook Kim, Jungsoo Lee, Zhenhui Peng, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. Love in Lyrics: An Exploration of Supporting Textual Manifestation of Affection in Social Messaging. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 79 (Nov. 2019), 27 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3359181 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Joseph Lampel and Ajay Bhalla. 2007. The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 2 (2007).
  28. Reeva Lederman, Greg Wadley, John Gleeson, Sarah Bendall, and Mario Alvarez-Jimenez. 2014. Moderated Online Social Therapy: Designing and Evaluating Technology for Mental Health. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 21 (02 2014). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2513179 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Minha Lee, Sander Ackermans, Nena van As, Hanwen Chang, Enzo Lucas, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2019. Caring for Vincent: A Chatbot for Self-Compassion. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 702, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300932 · DOI
  30. Guo Li, Xiaomu Zhou, Tun Lu, Jiang Yang, and Ning Gu. 2016. SunForum: Understanding Depression in a Chinese Online Community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 515-526. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819994 · DOI
  31. Ann Macaskill. 2013. The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 41, 4 (2013), 426-441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2012.743110 · DOI
  32. Shery Mead, David Hilton, and Laurie Curtis. 2001. Peer Support: A Theoretical Perspective. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 25 (02 2001), 134-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0095032 · DOI
  33. Robert Morris, Stephen Schueller, and Rosalind Picard. 2015. Efficacy of a Web-Based, Crowdsourced Peer-To-Peer Cognitive Reappraisal Platform for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17 (03 2015), e72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4167 · DOI · Paper page
  34. John Naslund, Kelly Aschbrenner, LA Marsch, and Stephen Bartels. 2016. The future of mental health care: Peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences -1 (01 2016), 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kathleen O'Leary, Arpita Bhattacharya, Sean A. Munson, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2017. Design Opportunities for Mental Health Peer Support Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1470-1484. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998349 · DOI
  36. Kathleen O'Leary, Stephen M. Schueller, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2018. "Suddenly, We Got to Become Therapists for Each Other": Designing Peer Support Chats for Mental Health. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 331, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173905 · DOI
  37. Steffi Paepcke and Leila Takayama. 2010. Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2010), 45-52.
  38. Zhenhui Peng, Yunhwan Kwon, Jiaan Lu, Ziming Wu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. Design and Evaluation of Service Robot's Proactivity in Decision-Making Support Process. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 98, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300328 · DOI
  39. Yada Pruksachatkun, Sachin R. Pendse, and Amit Sharma. 2019. Moments of Change: Analyzing Peer-Based Cognitive Support in Online Mental Health Forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 64, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300294 · DOI
  40. John Rooksby, Alistair Morrison, and Dave Murray-Rust. 2019. Student Perspectives on Digital Phenotyping: The Acceptability of Using Smartphone Data to Assess Mental Health. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 425, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300655 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Sherry Ruan, Liwei Jiang, Justin Xu, Bryce Joe-Kun Tham, Zhengneng Qiu, Yeshuang Zhu, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Emma Brunskill, and James A. Landay. 2019. QuizBot: A Dialogue-based Adaptive Learning System for Factual Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 357, 13 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300587 · DOI
  42. Mark Salzer, Nicole Darr, Gina Calhoun, William Boyer, Randall Loss, Jerry Goessel, Edward Schwenk, and Eugene Brusilovskiy. 2013. Benefits of working as a certified peer specialist: Results from a statewide survey. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 36 (09 2013), 219-21. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/prj0000016 · DOI
  43. Shruti Sannon, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Geri Gay. 2019. "I Was Really, Really Nervous Posting It": Communicating About Invisible Chronic Illnesses Across Social Media Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 353, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300583 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Catherine E. Schaefer, James Charles Coyne, and Richard Stanley Lazarus. 1981. The health-related functions of social support. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 4 (1981), 381-406.
  45. Stefan Siersdorfer, Sergiu Chelaru, Wolfgang Nejdl, and Jose San Pedro. 2010. How Useful Are Your Comments?: Analyzing and Predicting Youtube Comments and Comment Ratings. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 891-900. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772781 · DOI
  46. Liuping Wang, Xiangmin Fan, Feng Tian, Lingjia Deng, Shuai Ma, Jun Huang, and Hongan Wang. 2018. mirrorU: Scaffolding Emotional Reflection via In-Situ Assessment and Interactive Feedback. In CHI Extended Abstracts.
  47. Yang Wang, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Alain Forget, and Norman Sadeh. 2014. A Field Trial of Privacy Nudges for Facebook. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2367-2376. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557413 · DOI
  48. Jen-Her Wu and Shu-Ching Wang. 2005. What Drives Mobile Commerce? Inf. Manage. 42, 5 (July 2005), 719-729. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Shaomei Wu, Lindsay Reynolds, Xian Li, and Francisco Guzmán. 2019. Design and Evaluation of a Social Media Writing Support Tool for People with Dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 516, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300746 · DOI
  50. Diyi Yang, Robert Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2017. Commitment of Newcomers and Old-timers to Online Health Support Communities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6363-6375. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026008 · DOI
  51. Diyi Yang, Robert E. Kraut, Tenbroeck Smith, Elijah Mayfield, and Dan Jurafsky. 2019a. Seekers, Providers, Welcomers, and Storytellers: Modeling Social Roles in Online Health Communities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 344, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300574 · DOI
  52. Diyi Yang, Zheng Yao, Joseph Seering, and Robert Kraut. 2019b. The Channel Matters: Self-disclosure, Reciprocity and Social Support in Online Cancer Support Groups. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 15 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300261 · DOI

Authors
Peng, Z., Guo, Q., Tsang, K. W., & Ma, X.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-21
Pages
1-15
OpenAlex
W3029595001
Cited by
81
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (16204819)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
online mental health communities, writing support, peer support, text quality assessment, user confidence, user satisfaction, design considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review