Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success

Open access
Scheer, August-Wilhelm, Habermann, Frank·2000·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

article Free Access Share on Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success Authors: August-Wilhelm Scheer Univ. of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany Univ. of Saarland, Saarbrücken, GermanyView Profile , Frank Habermann Univ. of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany Univ. of Saarland, Saarbrücken, GermanyView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 43Issue 4April 2000 pp 57–61https://doi.org/10.1145/332051.332073Published:01 April 2000Publication History 7citation15,019DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations7Total Downloads15,019Last 12 Months863Last 6 weeks212 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteView all FormatsPDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/332051.332073

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lyttinen K. and Hirscheim R. Information systems failures--A survey and classification of the empirical literature Oxford Surveys in Information Technology 4/1987 Compass Ed. The Compass World IT Strategy Census 1998-2000; www.compass-analysis.de. Lyttinen K. and Hirscheim R. Information systems failures--A survey and classification of the empirical literature Oxford Surveys in Information Technology 4/1987 Compass Ed. The Compass World IT Strategy Census 1998-2000; www.compass-analysis.de.
  2. Malone , T.W. et al. Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes . MIT Center for Coordination Science , 21st Century Initiative Working Paper No. 5; ccs.mit.edu/21c/ mgtsci/index.html. Malone, T.W. et al. Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes. MIT Center for Coordination Science, 21st Century Initiative Working Paper No. 5; ccs.mit.edu/21c/ mgtsci/index.html.
  3. SAP , Ed. AcceleratedSAP: Driving Rapid Implementations for Rapid Results , Walldorf 1999 ; www.sap-ag.de/service/pdf/500 1923 2.pdf. SAP, Ed. AcceleratedSAP: Driving Rapid Implementations for Rapid Results, Walldorf 1999; www.sap-ag.de/service/pdf/50019232.pdf.
  4. Scheer , A.W. ARIS--Business Process Frameworks , 2 nd ed., Berlin et al. 1998 . Scheer, A.W. ARIS--Business Process Frameworks, 2nd ed., Berlin et al. 1998. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-97738-1

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Scheer, A.-W., & Habermann, F.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2000-04
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
57-61
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2080258928
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
21.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/332051.332073
The paper
Scheer, A.-W., & Habermann, F. (2000). Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/332051.332073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.