Cited by 149E-Government and Public ServicesEthics and Social Impacts of AIPublic Policy and Administration Research

A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Government and its Potential from a Public Policy Perspective

Open access
Valle-Cruz, David, Alejandro Ruvalcaba-Gomez, Edgar, Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo, Ignacio Criado, J.·2019·Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the latest trend being implemented in the public sector. Recent advances in this field and the AI explosion in the private sector have served to promote a revolution for government, public service management, accountability, and public value. Incipient research to understand, conceptualize and express challenges and limitations is now ongoing. This paper is the first approach in such a direction; our research question is: What are the current AI trends in the public sector? In order to achieve that goal, we collected 78 papers related to this new field in recent years. We also used a public policy framework to identify future areas of implementation for this trend. We found that only normative and exploratory papers have been published so far and there are a lot of public policy challenges facing in this area, and that AI implementation results are unknown and unexpected; since there may be great benefits for governments and society, but, on the other hand, it may have negative results like the so-called ”algorithmic bias” of AI when making important decisions for social development. However, we consider that AI has potential benefits in the public health, public policies on climate change, public management, decision-making, disaster prevention and response, improving government-citizen interaction, personalization of services, interoperability, analyzing large amounts of data, detecting abnormalities and patterns, and discovering new solution…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3325112.3325242

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valle-Cruz, D., Alejandro Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Ignacio Criado, J.
Affiliations
Universidad
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-06-18
Pages
91-99
ISSN
3050-8681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950647473
Cited by
149
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
68.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
artificial intelligence in government, public sector AI, public policy challenges, algorithmic bias, public service management, government accountability, public value, AI implementation, disaster prevention and response, government-citizen interaction, climate policy, interoperability, data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review