Cited by 114Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

AI and accessibility

Morris, Meredith Ringel·2020·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

A discussion of ethical considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3356727

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, M. R.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, Meredith Ringel
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2020-05-21
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
35-37
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W3123973939
Cited by
114
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
artificial intelligence, accessibility, AI ethics, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review