PreprintCited by 160Ethics and Social Impacts of AIHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes

Open access
Birhane, Abeba, Prabhu, Vinay Uday, Kahembwe, Emmanuel·2021·arXiv

Abstract

We have now entered the era of trillion parameter machine learning models trained on billion-sized datasets scraped from the internet. The rise of these gargantuan datasets has given rise to formidable bodies of critical work that has called for caution while generating these large datasets. These address concerns surrounding the dubious curation practices used to generate these datasets, the sordid quality of alt-text data available on the world wide web, the problematic content of the CommonCrawl dataset often used as a source for training large language models, and the entrenched biases in large-scale visio-linguistic models (such as OpenAI's CLIP model) trained on opaque datasets (WebImageText). In the backdrop of these specific calls of caution, we examine the recently released LAION-400M dataset, which is a CLIP-filtered dataset of Image-Alt-text pairs parsed from the Common-Crawl dataset. We found that the dataset contains, troublesome and explicit images and text pairs of rape, pornography, malign stereotypes, racist and ethnic slurs, and other extremely problematic content. We outline numerous implications, concerns and downstream harms regarding the current state of large scale datasets while raising open questions for various stakeholders including the AI community, regulators, policy makers and data subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.01963

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data Providers might have reason to propose their own license, especially to support values that are misrepresented in legal frameworks relevant to them.

    “Data Providers might have reason to propose their own license, especially to support values that are misrepresented in legal frameworks relevant to them 19 .”

    From Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    Section 5.4 (p. 12) says dataset creators are responsible for their licensing scheme and suggests a more restrictive licence for LAION-400M to limit harm. It does not say that providers should propose their own licences because relevant legal frameworks misrepresent their values; its discussion of law concerns possible copyright and GDPR violations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multimodal generative AI models such as CLIP and the CLIP-filtered LAION dataset have harmful biases embedded in them.

    “Recent studies expose the harmful biases embedded in multimodal generative AI models such as CLIP (contrastive language-image pretraining; Wolfe et al. 2022) and the CLIP-filtered LAION dataset (Birhane et al. 2021), which are core components of generative AI models (e.g., Dall-E 2 or Stable Diffusion).”

    From Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Birhane et al. 2021

  • Such audits have revealed the presence of misogyny, pornography and harmful stereotypes.

    “Such audits have revealed the presence of misogyny, pornography and harmful stereotypes [5, 6]”
  • There has been an increased focus on analyzing other dimensions of data quality and stewardship, with several initiatives aiming to document existing and newly developed resources.

    “There has also been an increased focus on analyzing other dimensions of data quality and stewardship [102, 107, 121, 123], with several noteworthy initiatives aiming to document both existing [9, 20, 30, 43], and newly developed [16, 60, 136] resources.”
  • Even works that include significant curation efforts for the sake of improving models focus on definitions of quality that prioritize technical performance over the agency of data and algorithm subjects, which can result in widespread data that proliferates misogyny, pornography without consent, and malignant stereotypes.

    “Even works that do include significant curation efforts for the sake of improving models [57, 113] focus on definitions of quality that prioritize technical performance over the agency of data and algorithm subjects, which can result in widespread data that proliferates misogyny, pornography without consent, and malignant stereotypes [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [4][4] M. K. Scheuerman, E. Denton, and A. Hanna, 'Do datasets have politics? disciplinary values in computer vision dataset development,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.04308 , 2021. - · arXiv
  2. [10][10] V. U. Prabhu, 'The phantom of the corpora: JFT-300M,' in Proceedings of the 2021 Beyond Fairness CVPR Workshop , 2021, available at shorturl.at/djnR0. -
  3. [12][12] K. Yang, K. Qinami, L. Fei-Fei, J. Deng, and O. Russakovsky, 'Towards fairer datasets: Filtering and balancing the distribution of the people subtree in the imagenet hierarchy,' in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , 2020, pp. 547-558. -
  4. [24][24] H. Petrie, C. Harrison, and S. Dev, 'Describing images on the web: a survey of current practice and prospects for the future,' Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction International (HCII) , vol. 71, no. 2, 2005. -
  5. [30][30] M. Hanley, S. Barocas, K. Levy, S. Azenkot, and H. Nissenbaum, 'Computer vision and conflicting values: Describing people with automated alt text,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.12754 , 2021. - · arXiv
  6. [37][37] S. Matic, C. Iordanou, G. Smaragdakis, and N. Laoutaris, 'Identifying sensitive urls at webscale,' in Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference , 2020, pp. 619-633. -
  7. [48][48] B. Thomee, D. A. Shamma, G. Friedland, B. Elizalde, K. Ni, D. Poland, D. Borth, and L.-J. Li, 'Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research,' Communications of the ACM , vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 64-73, 2016. -
  8. [68][68] M. Steiger, T. J. Bharucha, S. Venkatagiri, M. J. Riedl, and M. Lease, 'The psychological well-being of content moderators,' in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI , vol. 21, 2021. -
  9. [73][73] D. Erhan, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, 'Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network,' University of Montreal , vol. 1341, no. 3, p. 1, 2009. -
  10. [74][74] R. Q. Quiroga, L. Reddy, G. Kreiman, C. Koch, and I. Fried, 'Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain,' Nature , vol. 435, no. 7045, pp. 1102-1107, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birhane, A., Prabhu, V. U., & Kahembwe, E.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203737321
Cited by
160
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords
multimodal dataset, data curation, misogyny, pornography, alt text, Common Crawl, large language model training data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review