The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A trust architecture for blockchain in IoT
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain is a promising technology for establishing trust in IoT networks, where network nodes do not necessarily trust each other. Cryptographic hash links and distributed consensus mechanisms ensure that the data stored on an immutable blockchain can not be altered or deleted. However, blockchain mechanisms do not guarantee the trustworthiness of data at the origin. We propose a layered architecture for improving the end-to-end trust that can be applied to a diverse range of blockchain-based IoT applications. Our architecture evaluates the trustworthiness of sensor observations at the data layer and adapts block verification at the blockchain layer through the proposed data trust and gateway reputation modules. We present the performance evaluation of the data trust module using a simulated indoor target localization and the gateway reputation module using an end-to-end blockchain implementation, together with a qualitative security analysis for the architecture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Three papers [1,7,11] employ the blockchain to ensure data security, such as the trustworthiness of sensor observations, while the blockchain is also a storage medium.”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Four of these papers [7,11,19,31] investigate how data security solutions can improve data quality (in particular, data accuracy).”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is an explicit dependency between the data storage solution and the data quality support (i.e., ensuring data security) in these two works.”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Six primary studies [5,7,11,13,21,41] focus on data quality management in edge-based architecture levels (L2 and L3).”
From A Systematic Review of Data Quality in CPS and IoT for Industry 4.0 (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146
(2013) · Cited by 5,372
Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead
Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., & Coen‐Porisini, A. (2014) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008 · Cited by 2,341
A survey on trust management for Internet of Things
Yan, Z., Zhang, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2014) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 · Cited by 1,155
The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication
Vukolić, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9 · Cited by 1,051
Blockchain for Secure and Efficient Data Sharing in Vehicular Edge Computing and Networks
Kang, J., Yu, R., Huang, X., Wu, M., Maharjan, S., Xie, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2875542 · Cited by 808
Towards an Optimized BlockChain for IoT
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation · doi:10.1145/3054977.3055003 · Cited by 752
Self-citationKang, J., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D., Ye, D., Kim, D. I., & Zhao, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2894944 · Cited by 604
LSB: A Lightweight Scalable Blockchain for IoT security and anonymity
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2019) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.08.005 · Cited by 544
Self-citationThe impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks
Pattem, S., Krishnamachari, B., & Govindan, R. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1387663.1387670 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSB: A Lightweight Scalable Blockchain for IoT security and anonymity
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2019) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.08.005 · Cited by 544
Self-citationSecurity and Privacy for Green IoT-Based Agriculture: Review, Blockchain Solutions, and Challenges
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Yang, X. K., Derhab, A., & Maglaras, L. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973178 · Cited by 461
Blockchain-Based Digital Twins: Research Trends, Issues, and Future Challenges
Suhail, S., Hussain, R., Jurdak, R., Oracevic, A., Salah, K., Hong, C. S., & Matulevičius, R. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3517189 · Cited by 189
Self-citationA Systematic Review of Blockchain Applications
Sunny, F. A., Hájek, P., Munk, M., Abedin, M. Z., Satu, M. S., Efat, M. I. A., & Islam, M. J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179690 · Cited by 181
A Survey on Blockchain-Based Trust Management for Internet of Things
Liu, Y., Wang, J., Yan, Z., Wan, Z., & Jäntti, R. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3237893 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Dedeoglu, V., Jurdak, R., Putra, G. D., Dorri, A., & Kanhere, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Data61 (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-11-12
- Pages
- 190-199
- OpenAlex
- W2955398858
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- blockchain, Internet of Things, trust architecture, data trust, block verification, target localization, Internet of Things security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
