Cited by 23Social Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInteractive and Immersive Displays

Ludic-HRI: Designing Playful Experiences with Robots

Lee, Wen-Ying, Jung, Malte·2020·Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract

People are inherently playful, and playfulness matters not only when engaging in actual play but also in all other activities. Based on this, I propose using a ludic design approach as a means to broaden the design space for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). In this paper, I discuss the application of ludic design in HRI and explore how ludic activities can act as a mechanism for achieving new understandings from people during their interactions with robots. Two projects, BubbleBot and Sketching Robot, are presented as cases of designing ludic activities with robots. In my work, I have investigated how people perceived robots by applying exploratory research through design methods in creating the ludic experiences. I am continuously learning from my design and exploring potential areas for designing robots while identifying new values and goals for having robots in our lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3371382.3377429

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Design can learn from educational approaches more generally to design for playful, 'tinkering' engagements, and such 'ludic' design of generative AI systems can build on a long research tradition tracing back to Gaver and colleagues' Drift Table and contexts such as playful encounters with robots.

    “In this light, we argue that design can learn from educational approaches more generally to design for playful, 'tinkering' engagements, and note that importantly such 'ludic' design of generative AI systems can build on a long research tradition tracing back to Gaver and colleagues' Drift Table [33] and contexts such as playful encounters with robots [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, W.-Y., & Jung, M.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-03-23
Pages
582-584
OpenAlex
W3014381089
Cited by
23
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
ludic design, playfulness, human-robot interaction, ludic activities, robot perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review