Cited by 146Social Robot Interaction and HRIIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSpeech and dialogue systems

A Model-Free Affective Reinforcement Learning Approach to Personalization of an Autonomous Social Robot Companion for Early Literacy Education

Open access
Park, Hae Won, Grover, Ishaan, Spaulding, Samuel, Gomez, Louis, Breazeal, Cynthia·2019·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Personalized education technologies capable of delivering adaptive interventions could play an important role in addressing the needs of diverse young learners at a critical time of school readiness. We present an innovative personalized social robot learning companion system that utilizes children’s verbal and nonverbal affective cues to modulate their engagement and maximize their long-term learning gains. We propose an affective reinforcement learning approach to train a personalized policy for each student during an educational activity where a child and a robot tell stories to each other. Using the personalized policy, the robot selects stories that are optimized for each child’s engagement and linguistic skill progression. We recruited 67 bilingual and English language learners between the ages of 4–6 years old to participate in a between-subjects study to evaluate our system. Over a three-month deployment in schools, a unique storytelling policy was trained to deliver a personalized story curriculum for each child in the Personalized group. We compared their engagement and learning outcomes to a Non-personalized group with a fixed curriculum robot, and a baseline group that had no robot intervention. In the Personalization condition, our results show that the affective policy successfully personalized to each child to boost their engagement and outcomes with respect to learning and retaining more target words as well as using more target syntax structures as compared to children in the other groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301687

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This presents a great opportunity for AI's applications in education for further enhancing students' learning outcomes, reducing teachers' workloads and making learning personalized, interactive and fun for teachers and students.

    “This presents a great opportunity for AI’s applications in education for further enhancing students’ learning outcomes, reducing teachers’ workloads [30] and making learning personalized [64], interactive and fun [50, 53] for teachers and students.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Browne, C., et al. 2013. The new general service list: Cel- ebrating 60 years of vocabulary learning. The Language Teacher 37(4):13-16.
  2. Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R. 1994. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 4(4):253-278.
  3. McDuff, D.; Mahmoud, A.; Mavadati, M.; Amr, M.; Turcot, J.; and Kaliouby, R. e. 2016. Affdex sdk: A cross-platform real-time multi-face expression recognition toolkit. In Pro- ceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3723-3726. ACM.
  4. Páez, M. M.; Tabors, P. O.; and López, L. M. 2007. Dual language and literacy development of spanish-speaking preschool children. Journal of applied developmental psy- chology 28(2):85-102.
  5. Watkins, C. J., and Dayan, P. 1992. Q-learning. Machine learning 8(3-4):279-292.
  6. Wolf, M., and Gottwald, S. 2016. Tales of Literacy in the 21st Century. Literary Agenda Series. Oxford University Press.
  7. Morgan Kaufmann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, H. W., Grover, I., Spaulding, S., Gomez, L., & Breazeal, C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
01
Pages
687-694
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2905180035
Cited by
146
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8
FWCI
30.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1523118)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
social robots, personalized learning, early literacy, school readiness, bilingual children, English language learners, storytelling, child engagement, emotional cues, vocabulary acquisition, syntax learning, adaptive interventions, preschool children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review