Cited by 310Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber Security

The ai-based cyber threat landscape: A survey

Kaloudi, Nektaria, Li, Jingyue·2021·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have induced tremendous growth in innovation and automation. Although these AI technologies offer significant benefits, they can be used maliciously. Highly targeted and evasive attacks in benign carrier applications, such as DeepLocker, have demonstrated the intentional use of AI for harmful purposes. Threat actors are constantly changing and improving their attack strategy with particular emphasis on the application of AI-driven techniques in the attack process, called AI-based cyber attack , which can be used in conjunction with conventional attack techniques to cause greater damage. Despite several studies on AI and security, researchers have not summarized AI-based cyber attacks enough to be able to understand the adversary’s actions and to develop proper defenses against such attacks. This study aims to explore existing studies of AI-based cyber attacks and to map them onto a proposed framework, providing insight into new threats. Our framework includes the classification of several aspects of malicious uses of AI during the cyber attack life cycle and provides a basis for their detection to predict future threats. We also explain how to apply this framework to analyze AI-based cyber attacks in a hypothetical scenario of a critical smart grid infrastructure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3372823

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature [41, 42, 92] has collected and studied representative AI misuse cases, and summarized high-stake patterns that AI failures tend to follow [92], such as vulnerability to attacks, underperformance on noises, and biased prediction.

    “Literature such as [41, 42, 92] has collected and studied representative AI misuse cases, and summarized high-stake patterns that AI failures tend to follow [92], such as vulnerability to attacks, underperformance on noises, and biased prediction.”

    From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [41]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaloudi, N., & Li, J.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2020-02-06
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
1-34
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W3004908285
Cited by
310
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 13
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
adversarial learning, attack detection, smart grid security, critical infrastructure security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review