Cited by 40Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Education and EmploymentUsability and User Interface Design

Comparison of Methods for Teaching Accessibility in University Computing Courses

Zhao, Qiwen, Mande, Vaishnavi, Conn, Paula, Al-khazraji, Sedeeq, Shinohara, Kristen, Ludi, Stephanie, Huenerfauth, Matt·2020·Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Abstract

With an increasing demand for computing professionals with skills in accessibility, it is important for university faculty to select effective methods for educating computing students about barriers faced by users with disabilities and approaches to improving accessibility. While some prior work had evaluated accessibility educational interventions, many prior studies have consisted of firsthand reports from faculty or short-term evaluations. This paper reports on the results of a systematic evaluation of methods for teaching accessibility from a longitudinal study across 29 sections of a human-computer interaction course (required for students in a computing degree program), as taught by 10 distinct professors, throughout four years, with over 400 students. A control condition (course without accessibility content) was compared to four intervention conditions: week of lectures on accessibility, team design project requiring some accessibility consideration, interaction with someone with a disability, and collaboration with a team member with a disability. Comparing survey data immediately before and after the course, we found that the Lectures, Projects, and Interaction conditions were effective in increasing students' likelihood to consider people with disabilities on a design scenario, awareness of accessibility barriers, and knowledge of technical approaches for improving accessibility - with students in the Team Member condition having higher scores on the final measure…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3373625.3417013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These challenges also affect students and early-career professionals in HCI, who often encounter accessibility only briefly during their studies.

    “These challenges also affect students and early-career professionals in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), who often encounter accessibility only briefly during their studies [17, 56, 59].”
  • Formal accessibility education remains rare and often lacks practical depth; retention is low without hands-on application.

    “Formal accessibility education remains rare and often lacks practical depth. Where it exists, retention is low without hands-on application [36, 37, 59].”
  • Many HCI and design students encounter accessibility only superficially.

    “Many HCI and design students encounter accessibility only superficially [17, 56, 59].”
  • Lecture-based exposure alone does not ensure long-term competence in accessibility.

    “This echoes findings that lecture-based exposure alone does not ensure long-term competence in accessibility [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Q., Mande, V., Conn, P., Al-khazraji, S., Shinohara, K., Ludi, S., & Huenerfauth, M.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-10-26
Pages
1-12
OpenAlex
W3095519336
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1540396)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
access barriers, disabled users, human-computer interaction education, computing education, team design projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review