Cited by 15Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Education and EmploymentInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

A model of an accessibility curriculum in higher education

Open access
Weeden, Elissa·2023·Frontiers in Computer Science

Abstract

Individuals may face daily unnecessary challenges and barriers in digital and physical spaces and in the use of products, which can result in exclusion. As a society, we need to do better regarding accessibility. One step toward removing challenges and barriers to a more accessible and inclusive society is to increase awareness and knowledge around accessibility. Toward that end, a 4-year private technical university in the northeast United States has offered a four-course curriculum dedicated to accessibility. This curriculum, instruction, and pedagogy paper will describe the design and delivery of the four-course accessibility curriculum consisting of Design for Accessibility, Access and Assistive Technology, Accessibility Through the Lifespan, and Research in Accessibility. This model curriculum aims to educate students to mindfully consider, advocate, and increase accessibility as they prepare to enter the workforce to create digital and physical spaces and products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1139350

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barrows, H. S., and Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. Available online at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rit/detail.action?docID= 423456 (accessed May 1, 2023).
  2. St Louis, MO: Mosby. Described and Captioned Media Program. (n.d.-a). Captioning key. Available online at: https://dcmp.org/learn/captioningkey (accessed January 2, 2023).
  3. Shinohara, K., Kawas, S., Ko, A. J., and Ladner, R. E. (2018). Who teaches accessibility? A survey of U.S. computing faculty. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 197-202. doi: 10.1145./3159450.3159484

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weeden, E.
Affiliations
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Weeden, Elissa
Venue
Frontiers in Computer Science
Published
2023-05-15
Volume
5
ISSN
2624-9898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376609825
Cited by
10
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
accessibility education, higher education, assistive technology, accessible design, inclusive design, accessibility awareness, accessibility research, inclusive society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review