Cited by 14Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Differentially Private Knowledge Distillation for Mobile Analytics

Lyu, Lingjuan, Chen, Chi-Hua·2020·Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

The increasing demand for on-device deep learning necessitates the deployment of deep models on mobile devices. However, directly deploying deep models on mobile devices presents both capacity bottleneck and prohibitive privacy risk. To address these problems, we develop a Differentially Private Knowledge Distillation (DPKD) framework to enable on-device deep learning as well as preserve training data privacy. We modify the conventional Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) paradigm by compressing the knowledge acquired by the ensemble of teachers into a student model in a differentially private manner. The student model is then trained on both the labeled, public data and the distilled knowledge by adopting a mixed training algorithm. Extensive experiments on popular image datasets, as well as the real implementation on a mobile device show that DPKD can not only benefit from the distilled knowledge but also provide a strong differential privacy guarantee (ε=2$) with only marginal decreases in accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3397271.3401259

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous methods including finetuning, denoising, and fine-pruning have been shown to be insufficient against the latest attacks.

    “Other previous methods, including finetuning, denoising, and fine-pruning [153], have been shown to be insufficient against the latest attacks [156], [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyu, L., & Chen, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Fuzhou University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-07-25
Pages
1809-1812
OpenAlex
W3035302645
Cited by
14
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Funds of Fujian Provincial Department of Education (No. JAT190026)
  • Fujian Natural Science Funds (No. 2019J01243)
  • Fuzhou University (Nos. 510730/XRC-18075, 510809/GXRC-19037, 510649/XRC-18049 and 510650/XRC-18050)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61906043, 61877010, 11501114 and 11901100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
on-device deep learning, mobile analytics, pâté, knowledge distillation, data privacy, model compression, mixed training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review