The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning Based on Evolutional Representation Learning
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge Graph (KG) reasoning that predicts missing facts for incomplete KGs has been widely explored. However, reasoning over Temporal KG (TKG) that predicts facts in the future is still far from resolved. The key to predict future facts is to thoroughly understand the historical facts. A TKG is actually a sequence of KGs corresponding to different timestamps, where all concurrent facts in each KG exhibit structural dependencies and temporally adjacent facts carry informative sequential patterns. To capture these properties effectively and efficiently, we propose a novel Recurrent Evolution network based on Graph Convolution Network (GCN), called RE-GCN, which learns the evolutional representations of entities and relations at each timestamp by modeling the KG sequence recurrently. Specifically, for the evolution unit, a relation-aware GCN is leveraged to capture the structural dependencies within the KG at each timestamp. In order to capture the sequential patterns of all facts in parallel, the historical KG sequence is modeled auto-regressively by the gate recurrent components. Moreover, the static properties of entities, such as entity types, are also incorporated via a static graph constraint component to obtain better entity representations. Fact prediction at future timestamps can then be realized based on the evolutional entity and relation representations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the RE-GCN model obtains substantial performance and efficiency improvement for the temporal reasoning tasks on six benchmark datasets. Especially, it achieves up to 11.46% improvement in MRR for entity prediction with up to 82 times speedup compared to the state-of-the-art baseline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Antoine Bordes Nicolas Usunier Alberto Garcia-Duran Jason Weston and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2787--2795.
- Elizabeth Boschee, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O'Brien, Steve Shellman, James Starz, and Michael Ward. 2015. ICEWS coded event data. Harvard Dataverse, Vol. 12 (2015).
- 10.18653/v1/D18-1225 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3394486.3403209 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11573 · DOI · Paper page
- Zifeng Ding, Zhen Han, Yunpu Ma, and Volker Tresp. 2021. Temporal Knowledge Graph Forecasting with Neural ODE. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.05151 (2021). · arXiv
- Cristóbal Esteban, Volker Tresp, Yinchong Yang, Stephan Baier, and Denis Krompaß. 2016. Predicting the co-evolution of event and knowledge graphs. In 2016 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION). IEEE, 98--105.
- Alberto Garcia-Durán, Sebastijan Dumancić, and Mathias Niepert. 2018. Learning sequence encoders for temporal knowledge graph completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.03202 (2018). · arXiv
- 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5815 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_18 · DOI
- Simon Gottschalk and Elena Demidova. 2019. EventKG--the hub of event knowledge on the web--and biographical timeline generation. Semantic Web Preprint (2019), 1--32.
- Zhen Han, Peng Chen, Yunpu Ma, and Volker Tresp. 2020 a. Dyernie: Dynamic evolution of riemannian manifold embeddings for temporal knowledge graph completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03984 (2020). · arXiv
- Zhen Han, Yunpu Ma, Yuyi Wang, Stephan Günnemann, and Volker Tresp. 2020 b. Graph Hawkes Neural Network for Forecasting on Temporal Knowledge Graphs. 8th Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) (2020).
- 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.305 · DOI
- Woojeong Jin Meng Qu Xisen Jin and Xiang Ren. 2020. Recurrent Event Network: Autoregressive Structure Inference over Temporal Knowledge Graphs. In EMNLP.
- Woojeong Jin, Changlin Zhang, Pedro Szekely, and Xiang Ren. 2019. Recurrent Event Network for Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05530 (2019). · arXiv
- Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014). · arXiv
- Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016). · arXiv
- 10.1145/2808797.2808847 · DOI
- 10.1145/3184558.3191639 · DOI · Paper page
- Kalev Leetaru and Philip A Schrodt. 2013. Gdelt: Global data on events, location, and tone, 1979--2012. In ISA annual convention, Vol. 2. Citeseer, 1--49.
- Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali Thabet, and Bernard Ghanem. [n.d.]. DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 9266--9275.
- Farzaneh Mahdisoltani, Joanna Biega, and Fabian Suchanek. 2014. Yago3: A knowledge base from multilingual wikipedias. In 7th biennial conference on innovative data systems research. CIDR Conference.
- 10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19048 · DOI
- Lawrence Phillips, Chase Dowling, Kyle Shaffer, Nathan Hodas, and Svitlana Volkova. 2017. Using social media to predict the future: a systematic literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06134 (2017). · arXiv
- Ali Sadeghian, Miguel Rodriguez, Daisy Zhe Wang, and Anthony Colas. 2016. Temporal reasoning over event knowledge graphs. In Workshop on Knowledge Base Construction, Reasoning and Mining .
- 10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-030-04167-0_33 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467 · DOI
- Zhiqing Sun, Zhi-Hong Deng, Jian-Yun Nie, and Jian Tang. 2018. RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Space. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Rakshit Trivedi, Hanjun Dai, Yichen Wang, and Le Song. 2017. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Learning-Volume 70. JMLR. org, 3462--3471.
- Rakshit Trivedi, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Prasenjeet Biswal, and Hongyuan Zha. 2018. Dyrep: Learning representations over dynamic graphs. (2018).
- Théo Trouillon, Johannes Welbl, Sebastian Riedel, Éric Gaussier, and Guillaume Bouchard. 2016. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 2071--2080.
- Shikhar Vashishth, Soumya Sanyal, Vikram Nitin, and Partha Talukdar. 2019. Composition-based Multi-Relational Graph Convolutional Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Jiapeng Wu, Meng Cao, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, and William L Hamilton. 2020. TeMP: Temporal Message Passing for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03526 (2020). · arXiv
- Tianxing Wu, Arijit Khan, Huan Gao, and Cheng Li. 2019. Efficiently embedding dynamic knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.06708 (2019). · arXiv
- Bing Xu, Naiyan Wang, Tianqi Chen, and Mu Li. 2015. Empirical evaluation of rectified activations in convolutional network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00853 (2015). · arXiv
- Chenjin Xu, Mojtaba Nayyeri, Fouad Alkhoury, Hamed Yazdi, and Jens Lehmann. 2020. Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion Based on Time Series Gaussian Embedding. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 654--671.
- Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2014. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6575 (2014). · arXiv
- 10.24963/ijcai.2019/574 · DOI
- Cunchao Zhu, Muhao Chen, Changjun Fan, Guangquan Cheng, and Yan Zhan. 2020. Learning from History: Modeling Temporal Knowledge Graphs with Sequential Copy-Generation Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08492 (2020). · arXiv
- Xiaohan Zou. 2020. A survey on application of knowledge graph. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1487. IOP Publishing, 012016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion: A Survey
Cai, B., Xiang, Y., Gao, L., Zhang, H., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/734 · Cited by 133
A Survey on Temporal Knowledge Graph: Representation Learning and Applications
Cai, L., Mao, X., Zhou, Y., Long, Z., Wu, C., & Lan, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782 · Cited by 68
Chen, Q., & Chen, L. (2026) · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.1 · doi:10.1145/3770854.3780173
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Jin, X., Li, W., Guan, S., Guo, J., Shen, H., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Baidu (China) (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-07-11
- Pages
- 408-417
- OpenAlex
- W3182741322
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 88 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB1000902)
- GFKJ Innovation Program, Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (BAAI2019ZD0306)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1911401,62002341,61772501,U1836206,91646120,6172221)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- temporal knowledge graphs, knowledge graph reasoning, gated recurrent unit, entity prediction, relation prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review