End-to-End Structure-Aware Convolutional Networks for Knowledge Base Completion
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge graph embedding has been an active research topic for knowledge base completion, with progressive improvement from the initial TransE, TransH, DistMult et al to the current state-of-the-art ConvE. ConvE uses 2D convolution over embeddings and multiple layers of nonlinear features to model knowledge graphs. The model can be efficiently trained and scalable to large knowledge graphs. However, there is no structure enforcement in the embedding space of ConvE. The recent graph convolutional network (GCN) provides another way of learning graph node embedding by successfully utilizing graph connectivity structure. In this work, we propose a novel end-to-end StructureAware Convolutional Network (SACN) that takes the benefit of GCN and ConvE together. SACN consists of an encoder of a weighted graph convolutional network (WGCN), and a decoder of a convolutional network called Conv-TransE. WGCN utilizes knowledge graph node structure, node attributes and edge relation types. It has learnable weights that adapt the amount of information from neighbors used in local aggregation, leading to more accurate embeddings of graph nodes. Node attributes in the graph are represented as additional nodes in the WGCN. The decoder Conv-TransE enables the state-of-the-art ConvE to be translational between entities and relations while keeps the same link prediction performance as ConvE. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SACN on standard FB15k-237 and WN18RR datasets, and it gives about 10% relative improvement over the state-of-theart ConvE in terms of HITS@1, HITS@3 and HITS@10.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SACN is an end-to-end structure-aware convolutional network that takes into account node connectivity, node attributes and relation types simultaneously.
“Weighted GCN, known as SACN [26], is an end-to-end structure-aware convolutional network that takes into account node connectivity, node attributes and relation types simultaneously.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
The Introduction and Conclusion describe SACN as an end-to-end network whose weighted GCN encoder uses graph connectivity, node attributes, and relation types. But the citing sentence conflates the encoder with the full model: WGCN is a component of SACN, which also has a Conv-TransE decoder. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSACN's Conv-TransE decoder removes the reshaping operation and lets convolutional filters operate directly on input entities and relations in the same dimension, so translation properties of TransE remain while the same prediction performance as ConvE is maintained.
“The decoder, called Conv-TransE, removes the reshaping operation from the input entity and relation embeddings and lets the convolutional filters operate directly on input entities and relations in the same dimension.Thus, the translation properties of TransE remain, while the same prediction performance as ConvE is maintained.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
SACN improves the GCN model to obtain a weighted graph convolutional network by introducing weights for different types of relations.
“In the encoder part, by introducing weights for different types of relations, SACN improves the GCN model to obtain a weighted graph convolutional network (WGCN).”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
SACN also performs well among the implemented models, using relation types and entity attributes in the GCN model structure.
“SACN [26] also performs well among these models; it uses the relation types and entity attributes in the GCN model structure.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Prediction
Trouillon, T., Welbl, J., Riedel, S., Gaussier, É., & Bouchard, G. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06357 · Cited by 2,100 · see citing works
A Novel Embedding Model for Knowledge Base Completion Based on Convolutional Neural Network
Nguyen, D. Q., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, D. Q., & Phung, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2053 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
STransE: a novel embedding model of entities and relationships in knowledge bases
Nguyen, D. Q., Sirts, K., Qu, L., & Johnson, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1054 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Chen, T., Wang, Z., Li, L., Li, D., Li, Z., Chang, X., Bian, P., Liang, G., Wang, Q., & Xie, T. (2025) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.ecoop.2025.6
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Auer S; Bizer C; Kobilarov G; Lehmann J; Cyganiak R; and Ives Z 2007. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In The semantic web. Springer. 722– 735.
- Bollacker K; Evans C; Paritosh P; Sturge T; and Taylor J 2008. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 1247– 1250. AcM.
- Bordes A; Usunier N; Garcia-Duran A; Weston J; and Yakhnenko O 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 2787– 2795.
- Bruna J; Zaremba W; Szlam A; and LeCun Y 2013. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6203 · arXiv
- Carlson A; Betteridge J; Kisiel B; Settles B; Hruschka ER Jr; and Mitchell TM 2010. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In AAAI, volume 5, 3. Atlanta.
- Defferrard M; Bresson X; and Vandergheynst P 2016. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3844– 3852.
- Dettmers T; Minervini P; Stenetorp P; and Riedel S 2017. Convolutional 2d knowledge graph embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01476 · arXiv
- Hamilton W; Ying Z; and Leskovec J 2017a. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1025– 1035.
- Hamilton WL; Ying R; and Leskovec J 2017b. Representation learning on graphs: Methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05584 · arXiv
- Henaff M; Bruna J; and LeCun Y 2015. Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05163 · arXiv
- Ji G; He S; Xu L; Liu K; and Zhao J 2015. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), volume 1, 687– 696.
- Kipf TN, and Welling M 2016a. Variational graph auto-encoders. In Advances in neural information processing systems, Bayesian Deep Learning Workshop.
- Kipf TN, and Welling M 2016b. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 · arXiv
- Lin Y; Liu Z; Sun M; Liu Y; and Zhu X 2015. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In AAAI, volume 15, 2181– 2187.
- Nguyen DQ 2017. An overview of embedding models of entities and relationships for knowledge base completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08098 · arXiv
- Schlichtkrull M; Kipf TN; Bloem P; van den Berg R; Titov I; and Welling M 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In European Semantic Web Conference, 593– 607. Springer.
- Shang C; Liu Q; Chen K-S; Sun J; Lu J; Yi J; and Bi J 2018. Edge attention-based multi-relational graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04944 · arXiv
- Sharma A; Talukdar P; 2018. Towards understanding the geometry of knowledge graph embeddings. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), volume 1, 122– 131.
- Toutanova K, and Chen D 2015. Observed versus latent features for knowledge base and text inference. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, 57– 66.
- Wang Z; Zhang J; Feng J; and Chen Z 2014. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In AAAI, volume 14, 1112– 1119.
- Wang Q; Mao Z; Wang B; and Guo L 2017. Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 29(12): 2724– 2743.
- Yang B; Yih W.-t.; He X; Gao J; and Deng L 2014. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6575 · arXiv
- Ying R; He R; Chen K; Eksombatchai P; Hamilton WL; and Leskovec J 2018. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 974– 983.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880 · see citing works
A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 · Cited by 2,947 · see citing works
A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction
Wang, M., Qiu, L., & Wang, X. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13030485 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Harmonized representation learning on dynamic EHR graphs
Lee, D., Jiang, X., & Yu, H. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103426 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shang, C., Tang, Y., Huang, J., Bi, J., He, X., & Zhou, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Jingdong (China) (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 3060-3067
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- PMC
- PMC9233560
- OpenAlex
- W2950393809
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 160 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 25.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.aaai.org/ (unspecified)
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1718738, 1514357)
- National Institutes of Health (IIS-1718738)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA051922, R01DA037349, K02DA043063)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- knowledge base completion, knowledge graph embedding, graph convolutional networks, link prediction, node attributes, end-to-end learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review