Cited by 68Spreadsheets and End-User ComputingData Visualization and AnalyticsUsability and User Interface Design

Spreadsheet Comprehension: Guesswork, Giving Up and Going Back to the Author

Srinivasa Ragavan, Sruti, Sarkar, Advait, Gordon, Andrew D·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Spreadsheet users routinely read, and misread, others' spreadsheets, but literature offers only a high-level understanding of users’ comprehension behaviors. This limits our ability to support millions of users in spreadsheet comprehension activities. Therefore, we conducted a think-aloud study of 15 spreadsheet users who read others’ spreadsheets as part of their work. With qualitative coding of participants’ comprehension needs, strategies and difficulties at 20-second granularity, our study provides the most detailed understanding of spreadsheet comprehension to date.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3411764.3445634

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The researchers chose not to segment videos into predefined episodes or fixed time intervals.

    “Thus we chose not to segment videos into predefined episodes or fixed time intervals (e.g., 20-second segments, as exemplified in Srinivasa Ragavan et al. (2021)).”

    From Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Srinivasa Ragavan et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srinivasa Ragavan, S., Sarkar, A., & Gordon, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research, United Kingdom
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-05-06
Pages
1-21
OpenAlex
W3111869873
Cited by
67
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
comprehension strategies, think-aloud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review