Cited by 98Technology Use by Older AdultsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Avatar-Mediated Communication in Social VR: An In-depth Exploration of Older Adult Interaction in an Emerging Communication Platform

Open access
Baker, Steven, Waycott, Jenny, Carrasco, Romina, Kelly, Ryan M., Jones, Anthony John, Lilley, Jack, Dow, Briony, Batchelor, Frances +2 more·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

While HCI researchers have begun designing personalised VR experiences for older adults, there has been limited research examining the use of social VR - where users interact via avatars in a virtual environment. Avatar-mediated communication (AMC) is a crucial component of the social VR experience, but older users’ experience with AMC is poorly understood. We conducted a five-month study with 16 older adults evaluating a co-designed social VR prototype. Results show that AMC in social VR was seen as medium that supported introverted users to express themselves and was viewed as offering advantages when discussing sensitive topics. Our study provides new insights into how older adults view AMC in social VR as a communication medium and we contribute six design reflections, based on our results, that highlight the steps that can be taken to ensure that AMC in social VR can meet the communication needs of older users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3411764.3445752

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IVR is still considered too complicated for older adults to engage with as a means of taking part in social networking experiences when compared with face-to-face communication and other computer-mediated technologies such as FaceTime or Skype.

    “However, IVR is still considered too complicated for older adults to engage with as a means of taking part in these social networking experiences when compared with face-to-face communication as well as other computer-mediated technologies such as FaceTime or Skype [7].”

    From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 6.1 says some older participants found avatar-mediated communication in social VR too complex compared with FaceTime or Skype and inferior to face-to-face communication. The claim overgeneralizes that view to older adults and implies the complexity prevents them from engaging, whereas the paper reports mixed views among participants who did use the system. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current research supports the need for improvement in existing IVR features to facilitate more meaningful IVR activities such as social interaction.

    “However, current research supports the need for improvement in existing IVR features to facilitate more meaningful IVR activities such as social interaction [7].”
  • Some researchers had success in identifying and offering solutions to some of the nuisances reported by participants through the methodologies they used to explore this topic, such as participatory action research.

    “A key finding of this review is the success some researchers had in identifying and offering solutions to some of the nuisances reported by participants through the methodologies they used to explore this topic [7,14,15], such as participatory action research.”
  • Evidence suggests that older adults appreciate certain features that IVR offers them, such as added anonymity, which encourages introverted participants in particular to share more in IVR social circles.

    “Evidence suggests that older adults appreciate certain features that IVR offers them, such as added anonymity, which encourages introverted participants in particular to share more in IVR social circles [7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological., Harris Cooper, Paul M Camic, Debra L Long, A T Panter, David Rindskopf, and Kenneth J Sher (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, 57-71.
  2. Jason Hayhurst. 2018. How Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality is Being Used to Support People Living with Dementia-Design Challenges and Future Direc- tions. In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: Empowering Human, Place and Business, Timothy Jung and M Claudia tom Dieck (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 295-305.
  3. Xiang Xiao and Jingtao Wang. 2017. Undertanding and Detecting Divided At- tention in Mobile MOOC Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2411-2415.
  4. Baker, S., Waycott, J. & Carrasco, R. (2021). Avatar-mediated communication in social vr: An in-depth exploration of older adult interaction in an emerging communication platform. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -Proceedings, pp.1-13. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445752. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/258786 File Description: Accepted version License: Publisher's own licence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, S., Waycott, J., Carrasco, R., Kelly, R. M., Jones, A. J., Lilley, J., Dow, B., Batchelor, F., Hoang, T., & Vetere, F.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • National Ageing Research Institute (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-05-06
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W3125435840
Cited by
98
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
40.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP160101368)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
avatar-mediated communication, social virtual reality, older adults, co-design, communication media, introversion, user experience, design reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review