Cited by 46Teaching and Learning ProgrammingArtificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Robotics and Engineering

Introducing Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals with LearningML: Artificial Intelligence made easy

Rodríguez-García, Juan David, Moreno-León, Jesús, Román-González, Marcos, Robles, Gregorio·2020·Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

Abstract

This paper is a summary of the webinar hold on October 22nd at the “Computational thinking and robotics in education” track in which the LearningML project was presented. The LearningML project aims to bring the fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to children and people interested in acquiring knowledge on this subject in an easy way. AI has heavily irrupted in society and everyone is using, more or less consciously, application based on AI. Therefore, some kind of AI literacy is needed if we are to educate critically thinking citizens able to understand technologies that have a relevant impact on their lives. In this presentation we show how LearningML can help us to reach this goal trough programming applications based on Machine Learning (ML), the most prevalent subfield of AI today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3434780.3436705

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies emphasized the relevance of AI literacy in higher and adult education.

    “Moreover, many studies emphasized the relevance of AI literacy in higher and adult education (Lee, 2021a;Rodríguez-García et al., 2020;Sit et al., 2020;Xu & Babaian, 2021).”

    From Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Rodríguez-García et al., 2020

  • Five courses (50%) provided access to some form of programming environment.

    “Another finding is that five courses (50%) provided access to some form of programming environment, whether in computer labs within institutions (e.g., Vazhayil et al., 2019) or in sandbox programming environments in the digital world (e.g., Rodríguez-García et al., 2020).”

    From Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Rodríguez-García et al., 2020

  • Rodríguez-García et al. evaluated LearningML, a machine learning model builder, to develop critical thinking.

    “In another study, Rodríguez-García et al. (2020) evaluated LearningML, a machine learning model builder, to develop critical thinking.”

    From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Rodríguez-García et al. (2020)

  • LearningML teaches K-12 students AI fundamentals to understand the applications of AI, how it can affect their lives, and the ethical issues that arise from AI technologies.

    “This model builder teaches K-12 students on AI fundamentals to understand the applications of AI, how it can affect their lives, and the ethical issues that arise from AI technologies.”

    From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Rodríguez-García et al. (2020)

  • Free online resources and courses, public art installations and museum exhibits are viable approaches to cultivate the general public to understand and use AI applications ethically and to establish a collaborative, creative, robust and safe society.

    “To cultivate the general public to understand and use AI applications ethically, free online resources and courses (Robinson; 2020), public art installations and museum exhibits (Rodríguez-García et al., 2020) are viable approaches to establish a collaborative, creative, robust and safe society.”

    From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Rodríguez-García et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez-García, J. D., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., & Robles, G.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y Formación del Profesorado (INTEF), Spain
  • Programamos, Spain
  • Universidad de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain
Venue
Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-10-21
Pages
18-20
OpenAlex
W3126017685
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, machine learning, AI literacy, programming education, children, computational thinking, educational robotics, critical thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review