PreprintCited by 74Artificial Intelligence in EducationDigital literacy in educationLiteracy, Media, and Education

AI Literacy in K-12 and Higher Education in the Wake of Generative AI: An Integrative Review

Open access
Gu, Xingjian, Ericson, Barbara J.·2025·arXiv

Preprint — published as 10.1145/3702652.3744217

Abstract

Even though AI literacy has emerged as a prominent education topic in the wake of generative AI, its definition remains vague. There is little consensus among researchers and practitioners on how to discuss and design AI literacy interventions. The term has been used to describe both learning activities that train undergraduate students to use ChatGPT effectively and having kindergarten children interact with social robots. This paper applies an integrative review method to examine empirical and theoretical AI literacy studies published since 2020. In synthesizing the 124 reviewed studies, three ways to conceptualize literacy-functional, critical, and indirectly beneficial-and three perspectives on AI-technical detail, tool, and sociocultural-were identified, forming a framework that reflects the spectrum of how AI literacy is approached in practice. The framework highlights the need for more specialized terms within AI literacy discourse and indicates research gaps in certain AI literacy objectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.00079

Cites

135 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [7][7] M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, M. Bucciarelli, S. Capecchi, E. Gandolfi, C. Gena, F. Ianì, E. Marengo, R. Micalizio, and A. Rapp. 2021. Empowering AI competences in children: A training program based on simple playful activities, Vol. 3100. -
  2. [15][15] Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency . PMLR, 77-91. ISSN: 2640-3498. -
  3. [32][32] Yoram Eshet. 2004. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13, 1 (Jan. 2004), 93-106. Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). -
  4. [61][61] Siu-Cheung Kong, William Man-Yin Cheung, and Guo Zhang. 2023. Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students' Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society 26, 1 (2023), 16-30. Publisher: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan. -
  5. [81][81] M.V. Marienko, S.O. Semerikov, and O.M. Markova. 2024. Artificial intelligence literacy in secondary education: methodological approaches and challenges, Vol. 3679. 87-97. -
  6. [82][82] Tilman Michaeli, Stefan Seegerer, Lennard Kerber, and Ralf Romeike. 2023. Data, Trees, and Forests - Decision Tree Learning in K-12 Education. In Proceedings of the Third Teaching Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Workshop . PMLR, 37-41. ISSN: 2640-3498. -
  7. [128][128] David Touretzky, Christina Gardner-McCune, and Deborah Seehorn. 2023. Machine Learning and the Five Big Ideas in AI. International journal of artificial intelligence in education (Jan. 2023). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, X., & Ericson, B. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
125-140
OpenAlex
W4412781201
Cited by
73
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 13
FWCI
87.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
AI literacy, generative AI, K-12 education, higher education, AI literacy framework, critical AI literacy, social robots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review