Cited by 133Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Meta-HAR: Federated Representation Learning for Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Li, Chenglin, Niu, Di, Jiang, Bei, Zuo, Xiao, Yang, Jianming·2021·Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) based on mobile sensors plays an important role in ubiquitous computing. However, the rise of data regulatory constraints precludes collecting private and labeled signal data from personal devices at scale. Thanks to the growth of computational power on mobile devices, federated learning has emerged as a decentralized alternative solution to model training, which iteratively aggregates locally updated models into a shared global model, therefore being able to leverage decentralized, private data without central collection. However, the effectiveness of federated learning for HAR is affected by the fact that each user has different activity types and even a different signal distribution for the same activity type. Furthermore, it is uncertain if a single global model trained can generalize well to individual users or new users with heterogeneous data. In this paper, we propose Meta-HAR, a federated representation learning framework, in which a signal embedding network is meta-learned in a federated manner, while the learned signal representations are further fed into a personalized classification network at each user for activity prediction. In order to boost the representation ability of the embedding network, we treat the HAR problem at each user as a different task and train the shared embedding network through a Model-Agnostic Meta-learning framework, such that the embedding network can generalize to any individual user. Personalization is further achieved on top of the robustly learned representations in an adaptation procedure. We conducted extensive experiments based on two publicly available HAR datasets as well as a newly created HAR dataset. Results verify that Meta-HAR is effective at maintaining high test accuracies for individual users, including new users, and significantly outperforms several baselines, including Federated Averaging, Reptile and even centralized learning in certain cases. Our collected dataset will be open-sourced to facilitate future development in the field of sensor-based human activity recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3442381.3450006

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [2][2] Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez, Matthew W Hoffman, David Pfau, Tom Schaul, Brendan Shillingford, and Nando De Freitas. 2016. Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 3981-3989. -
  2. [3][3] Samy Bengio, Yoshua Bengio, Jocelyn Cloutier, and Jan Gecsei. 1992. On the optimization of a synaptic learning rule. In Preprints Conf. Optimality in Artificial and Biological Neural Networks . Univ. of Texas, 6-8. -
  3. [7][7] Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic metalearning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 . JMLR. org, 1126-1135. -
  4. [8][8] Matteo Gadaleta and Michele Rossi. 2016. Idnet: Smartphone-based gait recognition with convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03238 (2016). - · arXiv
  5. [13][13] Nicholas D Lane, Sourav Bhattacharya, Petko Georgiev, Claudio Forlivesi, Lei Jiao, Lorena Qendro, and Fahim Kawsar. 2016. Deepx: A software accelerator for low-power deep learning inference on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks . IEEE Press, 23. -
  6. [14][14] Nicholas D Lane, Petko Georgiev, and Lorena Qendro. 2015. DeepEar: robust smartphone audio sensing in unconstrained acoustic environments using deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing . ACM, 283-294. -
  7. [17][17] Robert LiKamWa, Yunhui Hou, Julian Gao, Mia Polansky, and Lin Zhong. 2016. RedEye: analog ConvNet image sensor architecture for continuous mobile vision. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News , Vol. 44. IEEE Press, 255-266. -
  8. [20][20] Devang K Naik and RJ Mammone. 1992. Meta-neural networks that learn by learning. In [Proceedings 1992] IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks , Vol. 1. IEEE, 437-442. -
  9. [25][25] Felix Sattler, Simon Wiedemann, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. 2019. Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-iid data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02891 (2019). - · arXiv
  10. [27][27] Virginia Smith, Chao-Kai Chiang, Maziar Sanjabi, and Ameet S Talwalkar. 2017. Federated multi-task learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 4424-4434. -
  11. [28][28] Konstantin Sozinov, Vladimir Vlassov, and Sarunas Girdzijauskas. 2018. Human Activity Recognition Using Federated Learning. In 2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing & Communications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Social Computing & Networking, Sustainable Computing & Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom) . IEEE, 1103-1111. -
  12. [30][30] Sebastian Thrun and Lorien Pratt. 2012. Learning to learn . Springer Science & Business Media. -
  13. [32][32] Hao Wang, Zakhary Kaplan, Di Niu, and Baochun Li. 2020. Optimizing Federated Learning on Non-IID Data with Reinforcement Learning. In IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications . IEEE, 1698-1707. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Niu, D., Jiang, B., Zuo, X., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-04-19
Pages
912-922
OpenAlex
W3153149826
Cited by
133
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5
FWCI
9.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
human activity recognition, federated learning, representation learning, meta-learning, model-agnostic meta-learning, personalized classification, mobile sensors, user heterogeneity, privacy-preserving machine learning, cross-user generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review