The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: An Application in Simulating Lake Temperature Profiles
Open accessAbstract
Physics-based models are often used to study engineering and environmental systems. The ability to model these systems is the key to achieving our future environmental sustainability and improving the quality of human life. This article focuses on simulating lake water temperature, which is critical for understanding the impact of changing climate on aquatic ecosystems and assisting in aquatic resource management decisions. General Lake Model (GLM) is a state-of-the-art physics-based model used for addressing such problems. However, like other physics-based models used for studying scientific and engineering systems, it has several well-known limitations due to simplified representations of the physical processes being modeled or challenges in selecting appropriate parameters. While state-of-the-art machine learning models can sometimes outperform physics-based models given ample amount of training data, they can produce results that are physically inconsistent. This article proposes a physics-guided recurrent neural network model (PGRNN) that combines RNNs and physics-based models to leverage their complementary strengths and improves the modeling of physical processes. Specifically, we show that a PGRNN can improve prediction accuracy over that of physics-based models (by over 20% even with very little training data), while generating outputs consistent with physical laws. An important aspect of our PGRNN approach lies in its ability to incorporate the knowledge encoded in physics-based models. This allows training the PGRNN model using very few true observed data while also ensuring high prediction accuracy. Although we present and evaluate this methodology in the context of modeling the dynamics of temperature in lakes, it is applicable more widely to a range of scientific and engineering disciplines where physics-based (also known as mechanistic) models are used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Paerl, H. W., & Huisman, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155398 · Cited by 2,854
Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems
Bongard, J., & Lipson, H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609476104 · Cited by 792
Cited by
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
Yu, H., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Li, S., Chen, S., Yang, S., Li, J., & Liu, X. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127846 · Cited by 96
Elder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, X., Willard, J., Karpatne, A., Read, J. S., Zwart, J. A., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V.
- Venue
- ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science
- Published
- 2021-05-18
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 2577-3224 (ISSN-L)
- 2691-1922
- OpenAlex
- W3160258528
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: An Application in Simulating Lake Temperature Profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3447814
- The paper
- Jia, X., Willard, J., Karpatne, A., Read, J. S., Zwart, J. A., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2021). Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: An Application in Simulating Lake Temperature Profiles. ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.